Health literacy education at the time of COVID-19: development and piloting of an educational programme for university health professional students in 4 European countries.
COVID-19
Curriculum
Health literacy
Healthcare professionals
Higher education
Online training
Patient centred-care
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Sep 2023
08 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
14
07
2022
accepted:
23
08
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
9
9
2023
entrez:
8
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health literacy has a strong influence on individual health outcomes and the sustainability of healthcare systems. Healthcare professionals often overestimate patients' health literacy levels and lack adequate competencies to address limited health literacy effectively. Therefore, promoting understanding through effective health communication between professionals and citizens is becoming increasingly important. Although health literacy has recently gained more attention, health literacy educational programmes targeting future healthcare professionals are still scarce, especially in Europe. This study describes the piloting process of a pan-European health literacy educational programme and shows how the educational material is being used during time of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The educational programme was developed through the definition of an educational philosophy and iterative co-creation processes consisting of stakeholders' consultations, material development and pilots with students. The evaluation was carried out in Italy through four pilot tests involving 107 students of health-related degrees. An evaluation questionnaire and a pre-post test were developed and used to collect students' and educators' feedback (quantitative and qualitative) and assess changes in health literacy awareness, respectively. Three additional pilots were organized in Italy and Germany mostly during the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the feasibility of the educational programme through online and hybrid learning, respectively. The pilots received positive feedback from both students and educators. Students were highly satisfied with the courses, reported their relevance for their future profession and appreciated the interactive teaching methods. The pre-post test showed a significant improvement in health literacy awareness after the training. Educators reported the adequacy and flexibility of the training material, the ease of transferability of the content of the lessons into practice, and the validity of the tested options to integrate the educational programme into the curricula. Our comprehensive, evidence-based educational programme contributes to addressing the existing challenges in Europe, and its flexibility allows for easy integration in the curricula, through different options, hence supporting a widespread uptake in the European Union and maybe beyond. Health literacy education is a useful tool to improve citizens' access to healthcare information and services, achieve better health outcomes and support healthcare systems' sustainability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health literacy has a strong influence on individual health outcomes and the sustainability of healthcare systems. Healthcare professionals often overestimate patients' health literacy levels and lack adequate competencies to address limited health literacy effectively. Therefore, promoting understanding through effective health communication between professionals and citizens is becoming increasingly important. Although health literacy has recently gained more attention, health literacy educational programmes targeting future healthcare professionals are still scarce, especially in Europe. This study describes the piloting process of a pan-European health literacy educational programme and shows how the educational material is being used during time of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
METHODS
The educational programme was developed through the definition of an educational philosophy and iterative co-creation processes consisting of stakeholders' consultations, material development and pilots with students. The evaluation was carried out in Italy through four pilot tests involving 107 students of health-related degrees. An evaluation questionnaire and a pre-post test were developed and used to collect students' and educators' feedback (quantitative and qualitative) and assess changes in health literacy awareness, respectively. Three additional pilots were organized in Italy and Germany mostly during the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the feasibility of the educational programme through online and hybrid learning, respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The pilots received positive feedback from both students and educators. Students were highly satisfied with the courses, reported their relevance for their future profession and appreciated the interactive teaching methods. The pre-post test showed a significant improvement in health literacy awareness after the training. Educators reported the adequacy and flexibility of the training material, the ease of transferability of the content of the lessons into practice, and the validity of the tested options to integrate the educational programme into the curricula.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our comprehensive, evidence-based educational programme contributes to addressing the existing challenges in Europe, and its flexibility allows for easy integration in the curricula, through different options, hence supporting a widespread uptake in the European Union and maybe beyond. Health literacy education is a useful tool to improve citizens' access to healthcare information and services, achieve better health outcomes and support healthcare systems' sustainability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37684654
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04608-3
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04608-3
pmc: PMC10492329
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
650Subventions
Organisme : Erasmus+
ID : 2017-1-NL01-KA203-035290
Organisme : German Bundestag
ID : 2519FSB519
Organisme : H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network
ID : 956501
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 15;15(6):
pubmed: 29914065
Nurse Educ. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):214-7
pubmed: 22914282
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1:62-9
pubmed: 24093346
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 27;15:249
pubmed: 26113118
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):153-8
pubmed: 27405196
J Nurs Educ. 2015 Dec;54(12):669-76
pubmed: 26652801
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jan;101(1):152-158
pubmed: 28823383
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 05;16(21):
pubmed: 31694299
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e249-e250
pubmed: 32302535
Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):68-74
pubmed: 31455683
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1271-1275
pubmed: 29697433
Health Psychol. 2018 Feb;37(2):160-169
pubmed: 29172607
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80
pubmed: 22276600
J Health Commun. 2016;21 Suppl 1:51-7
pubmed: 27043758
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1:82-102
pubmed: 24093348
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):
pubmed: 31861918
Int J Med Educ. 2019 May 03;10:90-97
pubmed: 31055522
Glob Health Promot. 2018 Nov 14;:1757975918788300
pubmed: 30427258
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:359-391
pubmed: 28972529
Fam Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):49-53
pubmed: 26950666
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1088-94
pubmed: 23807109
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):e225-8
pubmed: 21474264
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8
pubmed: 25843827
Educ Prim Care. 2017 Sep;28(5):274-281
pubmed: 28523960
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676
pubmed: 32113495
BMJ. 2012 Mar 15;344:e1602
pubmed: 22422872
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):119-22
pubmed: 17140758
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 09;5:2
pubmed: 30652027
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;8:581746
pubmed: 33313037
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):239
pubmed: 31014349
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):741-59
pubmed: 27053527