Effect of Different Vitrification Techniques on Viability and Apoptotic Index of Domestic Cat Testicular Tissue Cells.
apoptosis
cryovial
devices
testicles
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Aug 2023
31 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2023
revised:
28
07
2023
accepted:
30
07
2023
medline:
9
9
2023
pubmed:
9
9
2023
entrez:
9
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Vitrification is essential for successful tissue cryopreservation and biobanking in wild cats. This study aimed to compare different methods of vitrification (Ovarian Tissue Cryosystem-OTC, Straws-STW, and Solid Surface vitrification-SSV) for testicular fragment vitrification in tom cats. Testicular fragments were recovered from five adult tom cats and subjected to equilibrium vitrification using different cryovials and methods under the same conditions of vitrification solutions and cryoprotectants. The efficiencies of the methods were evaluated using histological analysis of spermatogonia and Sertoli cell nuclei, seminiferous tubular basement membrane detachment, and the gonadal epithelium shrinkage score scale. Cell viability was assessed using Hoechst PI and Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The results showed that OTC is an effective vitrification method for maintaining the distinction between spermatogonia and Sertoli cells. OTC was similar to the control for basal membrane detachment parameters (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37685032
pii: ani13172768
doi: 10.3390/ani13172768
pmc: PMC10486519
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Development. 1996 Jun;122(6):1703-9
pubmed: 8674410
Theriogenology. 2007 Jan 1;67(1):81-9
pubmed: 17070573
Anim Reprod Sci. 2013 May;138(3-4):220-7
pubmed: 23522695
Hum Reprod Update. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):39-51
pubmed: 15005463
Cryobiology. 2022 Feb;104:8-14
pubmed: 34822805
Cryobiology. 2019 Jun;88:38-46
pubmed: 30959024
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2003;15(6):343-9
pubmed: 14975232
Andrologia. 2012 Dec;44(6):366-72
pubmed: 22420610
Reprod Domest Anim. 2021 Aug;56(8):1156-1161
pubmed: 34174785
Cryobiology. 2021 Jun;100:142-150
pubmed: 33639111
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 May 11;8:42
pubmed: 20459796
Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Aug;20(4):392-400
pubmed: 35020470
Theriogenology. 2013 Jan 1;79(1):149-58
pubmed: 23138024
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Feb;14(1):17-22
pubmed: 26828827
Iran J Reprod Med. 2012 May;10(3):257-64
pubmed: 25243002
Anim Biotechnol. 2007;18(3):203-12
pubmed: 17612843
Theriogenology. 2009 Apr 15;71(7):1079-82
pubmed: 19215973
Cryobiology. 2017 Jun;76:74-91
pubmed: 28428046
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 15;95(4):1229-34.e1
pubmed: 20541745
Cell J. 2016 Spring;18(1):74-82
pubmed: 27054121
Biol Reprod. 2000 Aug;63(2):513-8
pubmed: 10906058
Cell Tissue Bank. 2020 Dec;21(4):667-673
pubmed: 32870439
Theriogenology. 2010 Jan;73(1):86-96
pubmed: 19853904
Hum Reprod. 2009 Oct;24(10):2457-67
pubmed: 19561041
Cryobiology. 2019 Dec;91:77-83
pubmed: 31639331
Biol Reprod. 2002 Dec;67(6):1671-80
pubmed: 12444040
Nat Commun. 2014 Jul 01;5:4320
pubmed: 24984101
Theriogenology. 2014 Feb;81(3):467-73
pubmed: 24290374
Theriogenology. 2018 Apr 15;111:69-77
pubmed: 29428847
Cell Tissue Res. 2007 Jan;327(1):167-76
pubmed: 16937112
Reprod Domest Anim. 2021 Oct;56(10):1342-1348
pubmed: 34333798
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0207317
pubmed: 30408126
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015 Mar;27(3):440-8
pubmed: 25481978
Reprod Domest Anim. 2017 Apr;52 Suppl 2:235-241
pubmed: 27862433
Postepy Biochem. 2021 Dec 02;67(4):362-369
pubmed: 35107958
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jan;23(1):17-28
pubmed: 17989070
Anim Reprod Sci. 2010 Dec;122(3-4):151-63
pubmed: 20832203
Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Oct;47(5):777-81
pubmed: 22151534