Clinical Characteristics of Eyes with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Retinal Pigment Epithelium Tears.

age-related macular degeneration anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy cleft retinal pigment epithelium tear subretinal hyporeflective space

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 31 07 2023
revised: 17 08 2023
accepted: 22 08 2023
medline: 9 9 2023
pubmed: 9 9 2023
entrez: 9 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first choice of treatment for eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it sometimes results in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tears. This study presents the detailed clinical characteristics of RPE tears to help predict their occurrence before anti-VEGF therapy initiation. This study retrospectively analyzed neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients who visited the Kyushu University Hospital and started anti-VEGF therapy between April 2013 and June 2020. Using medical records, we collected the clinical data of patients with RPE tears, including age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of anti-VEGF drug injections and the type and size of pigment epithelial detachment (PED). RPE tears occurred in 16 (1.50%) eyes of 16 patients in all 1068 nAMD eyes of 987 patients. The mean age of these patients with RPE tear was 81.7 ± 8.7 years. Fifteen eyes had typical AMD and one eye had polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. The mean number of anti-VEGF drug injections before RPE tears was 5.0 ± 5.1. All patients experienced PED before the RPE tear (hemorrhagic, 4 eyes; serous vascular, 2 eyes; fibrovascular, 10 eyes). The average PED height and area were 615.7 ± 175.3 μm and 21.0 ± 7.2 mm In patients with nAMD, RPE tears tended to occur in typical AMD eyes with high or large PEDs, and sub-RPE clefts. The visual prognosis depended on whether the RPE tear included the fovea.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the first choice of treatment for eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), it sometimes results in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tears. This study presents the detailed clinical characteristics of RPE tears to help predict their occurrence before anti-VEGF therapy initiation.
METHODS METHODS
This study retrospectively analyzed neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients who visited the Kyushu University Hospital and started anti-VEGF therapy between April 2013 and June 2020. Using medical records, we collected the clinical data of patients with RPE tears, including age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of anti-VEGF drug injections and the type and size of pigment epithelial detachment (PED).
RESULTS RESULTS
RPE tears occurred in 16 (1.50%) eyes of 16 patients in all 1068 nAMD eyes of 987 patients. The mean age of these patients with RPE tear was 81.7 ± 8.7 years. Fifteen eyes had typical AMD and one eye had polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. The mean number of anti-VEGF drug injections before RPE tears was 5.0 ± 5.1. All patients experienced PED before the RPE tear (hemorrhagic, 4 eyes; serous vascular, 2 eyes; fibrovascular, 10 eyes). The average PED height and area were 615.7 ± 175.3 μm and 21.0 ± 7.2 mm
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In patients with nAMD, RPE tears tended to occur in typical AMD eyes with high or large PEDs, and sub-RPE clefts. The visual prognosis depended on whether the RPE tear included the fovea.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37685562
pii: jcm12175496
doi: 10.3390/jcm12175496
pmc: PMC10488099
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Retina. 2014 Jul;34(7):1289-95
pubmed: 24675391
Retina. 2013 Sep;33(8):1551-7
pubmed: 23652578
Retina. 2008 Oct;28(9):1265-9
pubmed: 18628724
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;99(8):871-876
pubmed: 33787087
Retina. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(7):1039-45
pubmed: 20458264
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;156(5):981-988.e2
pubmed: 23972309
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 16;14:159
pubmed: 25515712
Retina. 2007 Jun;27(5):535-40
pubmed: 17558313
Retina. 2021 Apr 1;41(4):671-678
pubmed: 33346626
Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;68(8):513-9
pubmed: 6204685
Retina. 2016 Oct;36(10):1851-9
pubmed: 27074658
Retina. 2007 Jun;27(5):541-51
pubmed: 17558314

Auteurs

Junya Nagata (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Satomi Shiose (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Keijiro Ishikawa (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Takuma Fukui (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Kumiko Kano (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Kenichiro Mori (K)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Takahito Nakama (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Shoji Notomi (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Koh-Hei Sonoda (KH)

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Classifications MeSH