The Role of Echocardiography and Cardiac Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis.

cardiac computed tomography infective endocarditis transesophageal echocardiography transthoracic echocardiography

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 18 06 2023
revised: 06 08 2023
accepted: 11 08 2023
medline: 9 9 2023
pubmed: 9 9 2023
entrez: 9 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare disease with a high mortality rate and rising incidence, requiring timely and precise diagnosis in order to choose appropriate therapy. Imaging of morphologic lesions is an integrative part of diagnosis. Artifacts and the patient's habitus make echocardiography difficult to visualize advanced-form IE. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) constantly shows an additive diagnostic value due to high resolution of cardiac anatomy. Conjecturally, joint application of both diagnostic tests improves overall sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing IE. Patients with definite IE underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and CCT. We analyzed valvular and paravalvular IE lesions in all three imaging methods and compared them to surgical or autopsy findings. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive value of both imaging tests individually and jointly used. We examined 78 patients, male to female ratio 2:1, mean age 52.29 ± 16.62. We analyzed 85 valves, 70 native valves, 13 prosthetic valves, and 2 corrected valves due to Ozaki procedure, along with a central shunt and 4 pacemaker leads. As a single test, the sensitivity and specificity of CCT, TTE, and TEE for valvular lesions were 91.6/20%, 65.5/57.9%, and 60/84%, and paravalvular lesions were 100/0%, 46/10.5%, and 14.7/100%. When combined together, sensitivity and specificity for valvular lesions rose to 96.6/0% and paravalvular lesions to 100/0%. We also analyzed the diagnostic performance for each test in single and mutual application, per specific IE lesion. In the individual application, CCT in comparison to TTE and TEE shows better diagnostic performance in detection of valvular and paravalvular lesions. In joint application, there is a statistically significant difference in performance compared to their single use, especially in prosthetic valves and invasive forms of IE native valves.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare disease with a high mortality rate and rising incidence, requiring timely and precise diagnosis in order to choose appropriate therapy. Imaging of morphologic lesions is an integrative part of diagnosis. Artifacts and the patient's habitus make echocardiography difficult to visualize advanced-form IE. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) constantly shows an additive diagnostic value due to high resolution of cardiac anatomy. Conjecturally, joint application of both diagnostic tests improves overall sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing IE.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with definite IE underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and CCT. We analyzed valvular and paravalvular IE lesions in all three imaging methods and compared them to surgical or autopsy findings. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive value of both imaging tests individually and jointly used.
RESULTS RESULTS
We examined 78 patients, male to female ratio 2:1, mean age 52.29 ± 16.62. We analyzed 85 valves, 70 native valves, 13 prosthetic valves, and 2 corrected valves due to Ozaki procedure, along with a central shunt and 4 pacemaker leads. As a single test, the sensitivity and specificity of CCT, TTE, and TEE for valvular lesions were 91.6/20%, 65.5/57.9%, and 60/84%, and paravalvular lesions were 100/0%, 46/10.5%, and 14.7/100%. When combined together, sensitivity and specificity for valvular lesions rose to 96.6/0% and paravalvular lesions to 100/0%. We also analyzed the diagnostic performance for each test in single and mutual application, per specific IE lesion.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In the individual application, CCT in comparison to TTE and TEE shows better diagnostic performance in detection of valvular and paravalvular lesions. In joint application, there is a statistically significant difference in performance compared to their single use, especially in prosthetic valves and invasive forms of IE native valves.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37685577
pii: jcm12175482
doi: 10.3390/jcm12175482
pmc: PMC10488865
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Jun 18;2(3):e190189
pubmed: 33778583
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Feb 3;53(5):436-44
pubmed: 19179202
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021 Feb 18;3(1):e200378
pubmed: 33778655
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 May;95(5):982-997
pubmed: 32299668
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Dec;33(12):1442-1453
pubmed: 32981789
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Feb 1;19(2):199-207
pubmed: 28329276
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Nov;8(6):630-644
pubmed: 31832353
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;34(7):1155-1163
pubmed: 29450741
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Apr;30(4):633-8
pubmed: 10770721
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24;69(3):325-344
pubmed: 28104075
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Oct 25;19(12):127
pubmed: 29071426
Circulation. 2015 Oct 13;132(15):1487-515
pubmed: 26373317
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):291
pubmed: 29233094
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Jul;36(7):421-428
pubmed: 29713878
Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):334-341
pubmed: 32870134
Lancet. 2016 Feb 27;387(10021):882-93
pubmed: 26341945
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007626
pubmed: 29555840
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):574-8
pubmed: 20173130
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Sep;13(9):e011126
pubmed: 32900226
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;17(1):e1-e14
pubmed: 27746163
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Feb;30(2):377-87
pubmed: 24293045
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;147(4):1142-1149.e2
pubmed: 24507402
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 21;36(44):3075-3128
pubmed: 26320109
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):567-576
pubmed: 32757525
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Mar;11(2):202-19
pubmed: 20223755
Circulation. 2019 Nov 19;140(21):1753-1765
pubmed: 31738598
Am J Med. 1994 Mar;96(3):200-9
pubmed: 8154507
Open Heart. 2021 Oct;8(2):
pubmed: 34670832

Auteurs

Ana Petkovic (A)

Diagnostic Department of Center of Stereotaxic Radiosurgery, Clinic of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Nemanja Menkovic (N)

Diagnostic Department of Center of Stereotaxic Radiosurgery, Clinic of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Olga Petrovic (O)

Cardiology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Ilija Bilbija (I)

Department for Cardiac Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Nikola N Radovanovic (NN)

Pacemaker Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Dejana Stanisavljevic (D)

Institute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Svetozar Putnik (S)

Department for Cardiac Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Ruzica Maksimovic (R)

Center of Radiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Branislava Ivanovic (B)

Cardiology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Classifications MeSH