Guidelines for the Treatment of Abdominal Abscesses in Acute Diverticulitis: An Umbrella Review.

diverticular abscess percutaneous drainage

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 01 07 2023
revised: 10 08 2023
accepted: 11 08 2023
medline: 9 9 2023
pubmed: 9 9 2023
entrez: 9 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This systematic umbrella review aims to investigate and provide an analysis of guidelines regarding the treatment of diverticular abscesses. A systematic literature search was performed using the Cochrane Overviews of Reviews model and the 'Clinical Practice Guidelines'; at the end of initial search, only 12 guidelines were included in this analysis. The quality of the guidelines was assessed by adopting the "Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II" (AGREE II). The comparative analysis of these guidelines has highlighted the presence of some differences regarding the recommendations on the treatment of diverticular abscesses. In particular, there are some controversies about the diameter of abscess to be used in order to decide between medical treatment and percutaneous drainage. Different guidelines propose different abscess diameter cutoffs, such as 3 cm, 4-5 cm, or 4 cm, for distinguishing between small and large abscesses. Currently, different scientific societies recommend that diverticular abscesses with diameters larger than 3 cm should be considered for percutaneous drainage whereas abscesses with diameters smaller than 3 cm could be appropriately treated by medical therapy with antibiotics; only a few guidelines suggest the use of percutaneous drainage for abscesses with a diameter greater than 4 cm. The differences among guidelines are the consequence of the different selection of scientific evidence. In conclusion, our evaluation has revealed the importance of seeking new scientific evidence with higher quality to either confirm, reinforce or potentially weaken the existing recommendations from different societies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This systematic umbrella review aims to investigate and provide an analysis of guidelines regarding the treatment of diverticular abscesses.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using the Cochrane Overviews of Reviews model and the 'Clinical Practice Guidelines'; at the end of initial search, only 12 guidelines were included in this analysis. The quality of the guidelines was assessed by adopting the "Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II" (AGREE II). The comparative analysis of these guidelines has highlighted the presence of some differences regarding the recommendations on the treatment of diverticular abscesses. In particular, there are some controversies about the diameter of abscess to be used in order to decide between medical treatment and percutaneous drainage. Different guidelines propose different abscess diameter cutoffs, such as 3 cm, 4-5 cm, or 4 cm, for distinguishing between small and large abscesses.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Currently, different scientific societies recommend that diverticular abscesses with diameters larger than 3 cm should be considered for percutaneous drainage whereas abscesses with diameters smaller than 3 cm could be appropriately treated by medical therapy with antibiotics; only a few guidelines suggest the use of percutaneous drainage for abscesses with a diameter greater than 4 cm. The differences among guidelines are the consequence of the different selection of scientific evidence. In conclusion, our evaluation has revealed the importance of seeking new scientific evidence with higher quality to either confirm, reinforce or potentially weaken the existing recommendations from different societies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37685590
pii: jcm12175522
doi: 10.3390/jcm12175522
pmc: PMC10488020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

ANZ J Surg. 2017 Dec;87(12):1011-1014
pubmed: 27062439
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42
pubmed: 20603348
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):910-7
pubmed: 15784040
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2007 Aug-Sep;31(8-9 Pt 2):3S5-13
pubmed: 17925752
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Feb;19(2):97-103
pubmed: 25417122
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Mar;175(3):399-415
pubmed: 35038273
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2134-64
pubmed: 22736283
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):728-747
pubmed: 32384404
Digestion. 2014;90(3):190-207
pubmed: 25413249
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jul;49(7):939-44
pubmed: 16741596
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Oct;49(10):1533-8
pubmed: 16988856
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Nov;10(9):923-939
pubmed: 36411504
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):284-94
pubmed: 24509449
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 29;11:37
pubmed: 27478494
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2726-2741
pubmed: 31250244
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22 Suppl 2:5-28
pubmed: 32638537
Am Surg. 2014 Jul;80(7):635-9
pubmed: 24987892
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):5
pubmed: 35063008
World J Emerg Surg. 2011 Jan 13;6:2
pubmed: 21232143
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;31(5):983-990
pubmed: 27029799
Dan Med J. 2012 May;59(5):C4453
pubmed: 22549495
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Apr;13 Suppl 3:1-11
pubmed: 21366820
Digestion. 2019;99 Suppl 1:1-26
pubmed: 30625484
Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Feb;38(2):125-32
pubmed: 7851165
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Mar;43(3):290-7
pubmed: 10733108
Br J Surg. 2019 Mar;106(4):458-466
pubmed: 30811050
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Nov;10(9):940-957
pubmed: 36459576
Dig Surg. 2013;30(4-6):278-92
pubmed: 23969324
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Oct;19(10):615-26
pubmed: 26377584
Ann Ital Chir. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):3-8
pubmed: 19537116
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 May 7;15(1):32
pubmed: 32381121
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Oct;2(5):413-42
pubmed: 25360320
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr - Jun;84(2):220-240
pubmed: 31014749
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(5):A4140
pubmed: 22296900
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:201-208
pubmed: 27741423
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):622-6
pubmed: 23575402
Pol Przegl Chir. 2015 Apr;87(4):203-20
pubmed: 26146121
Gastroenterology. 2021 Feb;160(3):906-911.e1
pubmed: 33279517
Surg Endosc. 1999 Apr;13(4):430-6
pubmed: 10094765
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar;186(3):680-6
pubmed: 16498095

Auteurs

Roberto Cirocchi (R)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Francesca Duro (F)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Stefano Avenia (S)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Matteo Capitoli (M)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Giovanni Domenico Tebala (GD)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, AOSP of Terni, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Massimiliano Allegritti (M)

Department of Radiology, AOSP of Terni, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Bruno Cirillo (B)

Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Gioia Brachini (G)

Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Paolo Sapienza (P)

Department of Surgery, Sapienza University, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Gian Andrea Binda (GA)

General Surgery, Biomedical Institute, 16152 Genoa, Italy.

Andrea Mingoli (A)

Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Piergiorgio Fedeli (P)

School of Law, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Riccardo Nascimbeni (R)

Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH