Local control strategies for management of NSCLC with oligoprogressive disease.
Ablative treatment
Dissociated response
Lung cancer
Stereotactic radiotherapy
Journal
Cancer treatment reviews
ISSN: 1532-1967
Titre abrégé: Cancer Treat Rev
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7502030
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
25
06
2023
revised:
28
08
2023
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
11
9
2023
entrez:
10
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Progresses of systemic treatments in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and targeted therapies, led to the increased incidence of oligoprogressive disease (OPD). The OPD is a subtype of oligometastatic disease (OMD) defined as a progression of a limited number of lesions during systemic treatment exposure. The hypothesis was formulated that local radical treatments (LRT) could eradicate progressive lesions resulting from resistant clones, ultimately leading to systemic treatment sensitivity restoration. Recently published international consensuses and guidelines aim to obtain a uniform definition of OMD NSCLC, to standardize the inclusion of these patients in future clinical trials, as well as their management in daily practice. Although there is no specific definition of OPD, LRT strategies in OPD are supported after reporting promising results. Both retrospective and preliminary prospective randomized data of LRT for patients with OPD NSCLC are encouraging. More clinical and translational data are needed for selecting best scenarios where LRT should be delivered. In this review, we analyze the current available literature on LRT for patients with OPD in advanced NSCLC and discuss about future trial design and challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37690180
pii: S0305-7372(23)00114-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102621
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102621Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: E.D. reports grants and personal fees from Roche-Genentech, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, grants and personal fees from Boehringer, grants and personal fees from BMS, and grants and personal fees from MSD. B.B. reports sponsored research at Gustave Roussy Cancer Center by Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ellipse Pharma, EISAI, Genmab, Genzyme Corporation, Hedera Dx, Inivata, IPSEN, Janssen, MSD, Pharmamar, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Socar Research, Tahio Oncology, Turning Point Therapeutics. A.L. reports sponsored research at Gustave Roussy Cancer Center by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Roche. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.