Evaluation of the Outcome of Osteoarthritis among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement.

Knee osteoarthritis replacement

Journal

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
ISSN: 0976-4879
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101537209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 15 02 2023
revised: 12 03 2023
accepted: 13 03 2023
medline: 11 9 2023
pubmed: 11 9 2023
entrez: 11 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the outcome of osteoarthritis among patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). One hundred and four subjects with one hundred and fifty-two cemented total knee arthroplasties have been analyzed in the current research. Functional assessment was carried out using the preoperative and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score and its five subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in activity of daily living (ADL), function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related quality of life (QOL). A significant improvement in the KOOS symptom score was seen with score grade changing to excellent from poor. The average postoperative KOOS symptom score occurred to be 89.9198, whereas the mean preoperative KOOS score was 30.7960 with a mean difference of 59.02385. The mean postoperative KOOS pain score was 94.6304 and the mean preoperative KOOS score was 18.4831 with a mean difference of 76.14731. A significant improvement in the KOOS pain score was seen with score grade changing to excellent from poor. Sixty patients of 104 (57.7%) had an excellent satisfaction level with a postoperative range of motion, twenty-eight patients (26.9%) had a good, eleven patients (10.6%) had a fair, and five patients (4.8%) had a poor satisfaction level with a postoperative range of motion. Surgery for a TKR is successful in reducing individuals' pain and restoring their functional ability. Preoperative expectations and KOOS subscale scores are factors in patients' satisfaction, which is determined a year following surgery.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
To assess the outcome of osteoarthritis among patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
One hundred and four subjects with one hundred and fifty-two cemented total knee arthroplasties have been analyzed in the current research. Functional assessment was carried out using the preoperative and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score and its five subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in activity of daily living (ADL), function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related quality of life (QOL).
Results UNASSIGNED
A significant improvement in the KOOS symptom score was seen with score grade changing to excellent from poor. The average postoperative KOOS symptom score occurred to be 89.9198, whereas the mean preoperative KOOS score was 30.7960 with a mean difference of 59.02385. The mean postoperative KOOS pain score was 94.6304 and the mean preoperative KOOS score was 18.4831 with a mean difference of 76.14731. A significant improvement in the KOOS pain score was seen with score grade changing to excellent from poor. Sixty patients of 104 (57.7%) had an excellent satisfaction level with a postoperative range of motion, twenty-eight patients (26.9%) had a good, eleven patients (10.6%) had a fair, and five patients (4.8%) had a poor satisfaction level with a postoperative range of motion.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Surgery for a TKR is successful in reducing individuals' pain and restoring their functional ability. Preoperative expectations and KOOS subscale scores are factors in patients' satisfaction, which is determined a year following surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37694077
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_148_23
pii: JPBS-15-1236
pmc: PMC10485551
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

S1236-S1238

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb;50(2):476-87
pubmed: 14872490
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1597-606
pubmed: 26488691
Cartilage. 2013 Jul;4(3):219-26
pubmed: 26069668
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Dec;49(12):2413-9
pubmed: 20823092
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):480-5
pubmed: 16510811
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Apr;64(4):556-63
pubmed: 15374855
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Sep;23(9):1465-75
pubmed: 25937024
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):254-60
pubmed: 17681803
Radiology. 1994 Aug;192(2):485-91
pubmed: 8029420
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2515-24
pubmed: 24369076
BMJ. 2014 May 21;348:g3253
pubmed: 24850821
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1124-7
pubmed: 15115714
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 1):330-6
pubmed: 12965941

Auteurs

Shekhar Singal (S)

Department of Orthopedics, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMC and H), Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Sunny Gupta (S)

Department of Orthopedics, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMC and H), Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Rajnish Garg (R)

Department of Orthopedics, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMC and H), Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Pankaj Kumar (P)

Department of Psychiatry, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMC and H), Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Classifications MeSH