Mesh overlap for ventral hernia repair in current practice.
Evidence-based practice
Hernia
Hernia repair
Mesh
Overlap
Practice guidelines
Ventral hernia
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
30
07
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
medline:
12
9
2023
entrez:
11
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sufficient overlap of mesh beyond the borders of a ventral hernia helps prevent hernia recurrence. Guidelines from the European Hernia Society and American Hernia Society recommend ≥ 2 cm overlap for open repair of < 1-cm hernias, ≥ 3-cm overlap for open repair of 1-4-cm hernias, ≥ 5-cm overlap for open repair of > 4-cm hernias, and ≥ 5-cm overlap for all laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. We evaluated whether current practice reflects this guidance. We used the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Hernia Registry to evaluate patients who underwent elective ventral and umbilical hernia repair between 2020 and 2022. Mesh overlap was calculated as [(width of mesh - width of hernia)/2]. The main outcome was "sufficient overlap," defined based on published EHS and AHS guidelines. Explanatory variables included patient, operative, and hernia characteristics. The main analysis was a multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between explanatory variables and sufficient mesh overlap. 4178 patients underwent ventral hernia repair with a mean age of 55.2 (13.9) years, 1739 (41.6%) females, mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.1 (7.2) kg/m Although sufficient mesh overlap is recommended to prevent ventral hernia recurrence, only a quarter of ventral hernia repairs in a state-wide cohort of patients had sufficient overlap according to evidence-based guidelines. Factors strongly associated with sufficient overlap included myofascial release, mesh type, and laparoscopic repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37697114
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10348-8
pii: 10.1007/s00464-023-10348-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9476-9482Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Porrero JL, Cano-Valderrama O, Castillo MJ et al (2018) Importance of mesh overlap on hernia recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair with bilayer prosthesis. Am J Surg 216(5):919–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.041
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.041
pubmed: 29429547
Hauters P, Desmet J, Gherardi D, Dewaele S, Poilvache H, Malvaux P (2017) Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique. Surg Endosc 31(9):3656–3663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0
pubmed: 28078462
LeBlanc K (2016) Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 20(1):85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1399-9
doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1399-9
pubmed: 26143072
Guerin G, Turquier F (2013) Impact of the defect size, the mesh overlap and the fixation depth on ventral hernia repairs: a combined experimental and numerical approach. Hernia 17(5):647–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1050-6
doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1050-6
pubmed: 23456147
Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R et al (2020) Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg 107(3):171–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11489
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11489
pubmed: 31916607
Sando A, Rosen MJ, Heniford BT, Bisgaard T (2020) Long-term patient-reported outcomes and quality of the evidence in ventral hernia mesh repair: a systematic review. Hernia 24(4):695–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02154-1
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02154-1
pubmed: 32152807
Gray SH, Vick CC, Graham LA, Finan KR, Neumayer LA, Hawn MT (2008) Variation in mesh placement for ventral hernia repair: an opportunity for process improvement? Am J Surg 196(2):201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.041
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.041
pubmed: 18513688
Howard R, Ehlers A, Delaney L et al (2023) Hospital-level variation in mesh use for ventral and incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 37(2):1501–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09357-w
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09357-w
pubmed: 35851814
Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC (2011) Hospital-level variability in incisional hernia repair technique affects patient outcomes. Surgery 149(2):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.001
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.001
pubmed: 21238712
Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC (2010) Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 210(5):648–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038
pubmed: 20421023
Howard R, Ehlers A, Delaney L et al (2021) Leveraging a statewide quality collaborative to understand population-level hernia care. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.05.013
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.05.013
pubmed: 34090661
Healy MA, Regenbogen SE, Kanters AE et al (2017) Surgeon variation in complications with minimally invasive and open colectomy: results from the Michigan surgical quality collaborative. JAMA Surg 152(9):860–867. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1527
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1527
pubmed: 28614551
pmcid: 5710462
Ponten JEH, Leenders BJM, Leclercq WKG et al (2018) Mesh versus patch repair for epigastric and umbilical hernia (MORPHEUS Trial); one-year results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 42(5):1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4297-8
doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4297-8
pubmed: 29026977
Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH et al (2018) Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 391(10123):860–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8
pubmed: 29459021
Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA Jr, Lipsett PA, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States. Surgery 134(4):534–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00273-3 (discussion 540–541)
doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00273-3
pubmed: 14605612
McCulloch P, Nagendran M, Campbell WB et al (2013) Strategies to reduce variation in the use of surgery. Lancet 382(9898):1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61216-7
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61216-7
pubmed: 24075053
Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 361(14):1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0903048
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0903048
pubmed: 19797283
Bennett-Guerrero E, Zhao Y, O’Brien SM et al (2010) Variation in use of blood transfusion in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 304(14):1568–1575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1406
doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1406
pubmed: 20940382
Vu JV, Gunaseelan V, Krapohl GL et al (2019) Surgeon utilization of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a population-based study. Surg Endosc 33(2):486–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6322-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6322-x
pubmed: 29987572
Nathan H, Dimick JB (2017) Medicare’s shift to mandatory alternative payment models: why surgeons should care. JAMA Surg 152(2):125–126. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4005
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4005
pubmed: 27893025
Howard R, Hallway A, Santos-Parker J et al (2019) Optimizing postoperative opioid prescribing through quality-based reimbursement. JAMA Netw Open 2(9):e1911619. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11619
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11619
pubmed: 31532512
pmcid: 6752089
Jha AK (2017) Public reporting of surgical outcomes: surgeons, hospitals, or both? JAMA Forum Arch. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2017.0039
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2017.0039
Sheetz KH, Englesbe MJ (2020) Expanding the quality collaborative model as a blueprint for higher-value care. JAMA Health Forum 1(5):e200413–e200413. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0413
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0413
pubmed: 36218502