Enhancing European Management of Analgesia, Sedation, and Delirium: A Multinational, Prospective, Interventional Before-After Trial.
Critical care
Delirium
Delivery of health care
Europe
Intensive care units
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2023
11 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
10
05
2023
accepted:
08
08
2023
medline:
12
9
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
entrez:
11
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of a structured educational intervention on the implementation of guideline-recommended pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) assessment. This was a prospective, multinational, interventional before-after trial conducted at 12 intensive care units from 10 centers in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and the UK. Intensive care units underwent a 6-week structured educational program, comprising online lectures, instructional videos, educational handouts, and bedside teaching. Patient-level PAD assessment data were collected in three 1-day point-prevalence assessments before (T1), 6 weeks after (T2), and 1 year after (T3) the educational program. A total of 430 patients were included. The rate of patients who received all three PAD assessments changed from 55% (107/195) at T1 to 53% (68/129) at T2, but increased to 73% (77/106) at T3 (p = 0.003). The delirium screening rate increased from 64% (124/195) at T1 to 65% (84/129) at T2 and 77% (82/106) at T3 (p = 0.041). The pain assessment rate increased from 87% (170/195) at T1 to 92% (119/129) at T2 and 98% (104/106) at T3 (p = 0.005). The rate of sedation assessment showed no signficiant change. The proportion of patients who received nonpharmacological delirium prevention measures increased from 58% (114/195) at T1 to 80% (103/129) at T2 and 91% (96/106) at T3 (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression revealed that at T3, patients were more likely to receive a delirium assessment (odds ratio [OR] 2.138, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.206-3.790; p = 0.009), sedation assessment (OR 4.131, 95% CI 1.372-12.438; p = 0.012), or all three PAD assessments (OR 2.295, 95% CI 1.349-3.903; p = 0.002) compared with T1. In routine care, many patients were not assessed for PAD. Assessment rates increased significantly 1 year after the intervention. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03553719.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of a structured educational intervention on the implementation of guideline-recommended pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) assessment.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a prospective, multinational, interventional before-after trial conducted at 12 intensive care units from 10 centers in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and the UK. Intensive care units underwent a 6-week structured educational program, comprising online lectures, instructional videos, educational handouts, and bedside teaching. Patient-level PAD assessment data were collected in three 1-day point-prevalence assessments before (T1), 6 weeks after (T2), and 1 year after (T3) the educational program.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 430 patients were included. The rate of patients who received all three PAD assessments changed from 55% (107/195) at T1 to 53% (68/129) at T2, but increased to 73% (77/106) at T3 (p = 0.003). The delirium screening rate increased from 64% (124/195) at T1 to 65% (84/129) at T2 and 77% (82/106) at T3 (p = 0.041). The pain assessment rate increased from 87% (170/195) at T1 to 92% (119/129) at T2 and 98% (104/106) at T3 (p = 0.005). The rate of sedation assessment showed no signficiant change. The proportion of patients who received nonpharmacological delirium prevention measures increased from 58% (114/195) at T1 to 80% (103/129) at T2 and 91% (96/106) at T3 (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression revealed that at T3, patients were more likely to receive a delirium assessment (odds ratio [OR] 2.138, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.206-3.790; p = 0.009), sedation assessment (OR 4.131, 95% CI 1.372-12.438; p = 0.012), or all three PAD assessments (OR 2.295, 95% CI 1.349-3.903; p = 0.002) compared with T1.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In routine care, many patients were not assessed for PAD. Assessment rates increased significantly 1 year after the intervention. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03553719.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37697129
doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01837-8
pii: 10.1007/s12028-023-01837-8
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03553719']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
ID : NEXT Start-up Grant
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Chanques G, Sebbane M, Barbotte E, et al. A prospective study of pain at rest: incidence and characteristics of an unrecognized symptom in surgical and trauma versus medical intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(5):858–60.
doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000287211.98642.51
Desbiens NA, Wu AW, Broste SK, et al. Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: findings from the SUPPORT research investigations. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(12):1953–61.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00005
Fraser GL, Prato BS, Riker RR, Berthiaume D, Wilkins ML. Frequency, severity, and treatment of agitation in young versus elderly patients in the ICU. Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20(1):75–82.
doi: 10.1592/phco.20.1.75.34663
Balzer F, Weiß B, Kumpf O, et al. Early deep sedation is associated with decreased in-hospital and two-year follow-up survival. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):197.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0929-2
Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al. Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1753–62.
doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753
Mehta S, Cook D, Devlin JW, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults*. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(3):557–66.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000727
Chanques G, Jaber S, Barbotte E, et al. Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit*. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(6):1691–9.
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218416.62457.56
Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, et al. Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724–31.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0522OC
Ely E, Gautam S, Margolin R, et al. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(12):1892–900.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1132-2
Luetz A, Weiss B, Boettcher S, et al. Routine delirium monitoring is independently associated with a reduction of hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a prospective, observational cohort study. J Crit Care. 2016;35:168–73.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.028
Goldberg TE, Chen C, Wang Y, et al. Association of delirium with long-term cognitive decline: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(11):1373–81.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2273
Devlin J, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825–73.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
Baron R, Binder A, Biniek R, et al. Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-guideline 2015)—short version. GMS German Med Sci. 2015;13:Doc19.
Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263–306.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72
Chanques G, Viel E, Constantin J-M, et al. The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain. 2010;151(3):711–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.039
Payen J-F, Bru O, Bosson J-L, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(12):2258–63.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00004
Chanques G, Payen J-F, Mercier G, et al. Assessing pain in non-intubated critically ill patients unable to self report: an adaptation of the Behavioral Pain Scale. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12):2060.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1590-5
Gélinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):420–7.
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2006.15.4.420
Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1370–9.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012
Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(5):859–64.
doi: 10.1007/s001340100909
Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–44.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138
Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(7):1325–9.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00022
Luz M, Brandão Barreto B, de Castro REV, et al. Practices in sedation, analgesia, mobilization, delirium, and sleep deprivation in adult intensive care units (SAMDS-ICU): an international survey before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-00985-y
Luetz A, Balzer F, Radtke FM, et al. Delirium, sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit: a multinational, two-part survey among intensivists. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e110935.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110935
Kotfis K, Zegan-Barańska M, Żukowski M, et al. Multicenter assessment of sedation and delirium practices in the intensive care units in Poland—Is this common practice in Eastern Europe? BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17(1):120.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0415-2
Sneyers B, Laterre P-F, Perreault MM, Wouters D, Spinewine A. Current practices and barriers impairing physicians’ and nurses’ adherence to analgo-sedation recommendations in the intensive care unit—a national survey. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):655.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0655-1
O’Connor M, Bucknall T, Manias E. Sedation management in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: doctors’ and nurses’ practices and opinions. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(3):285–95.
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009541
Mehta S, Burry L, Fischer S, et al. Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients*. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):374–80.
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000196830.61965.F1
Martin J, Parsch A, Franck M, et al. Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey. Crit Care. 2005;9(2):R117.
doi: 10.1186/cc3035
Lee SY, Fisher J, Wand APF, et al. Developing delirium best practice: a systematic review of education interventions for healthcare professionals working in inpatient settings. Eur Geriatr Med. 2020;11(1):1–32.
doi: 10.1007/s41999-019-00278-x
Balas MC, Burke WJ, Gannon D, et al. Implementing the ABCDE bundle into everyday care: opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned for implementing the ICU Pain, Agitation, and Delirium guidelines. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):S116–27.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a17064
Gesin G, Russell BB, Lin AP, et al. Impact of a delirium screening tool and multifaceted education on nurses’ knowledge of delirium and ability to evaluate it correctly. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(1):e1–11.
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012605
Devlin JW, Fong JJ, Schumaker G, et al. Use of a validated delirium assessment tool improves the ability of physicians to identify delirium in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(12):2721–4.
doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000292011.93074.82
Hickin SL, White S, Knopp-Sihota J. Nurses’ knowledge and perception of delirium screening and assessment in the intensive care unit: long-term effectiveness of an education-based knowledge translation intervention. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;41:43–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.03.010
Mistraletti G, Umbrello M, Anania S, et al. Neurological assessment with validated tools in general ICU: multicenter, randomized, before and after, pragmatic study to evaluate the effectiveness of an e-learning platform for continuous medical education. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83(2):145–54.
doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11103-4
Swan JT. Decreasing inappropriate unable-to-assess ratings for the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Am J Crit Care. 2014;23(1):60–9.
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014567
Sinvani L, Delle Site C, Laumenede T, et al. Improving delirium detection in intensive care units: multicomponent education and training program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(11):3249–57.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.17419
Radtke FM, Heymann A, Franck M, et al. How to implement monitoring tools for sedation, pain and delirium in the intensive care unit: an experimental cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(12):1974–81.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2658-1
Rosenthal M, Paul N, Grunow JJ, et al. Comparing routine with expert delirium screening in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of data from the prospective, multicenter EuMAS study (abstract at ESICM LIVES, 22–26 October 2022, Paris, France). Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022;10(supplement 2):39.
Paul N, Grunow JJ, Rosenthal M, et al. Perceived vs. observed adherence to delirium screening: a secondary analysis of data from the prospective, multicenter EuMAS study (abstract at ESICM LIVES, 22–26 October 2022, Paris, France). Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022;10(supplement 2):39.
Grunow JJ, Paul N, Rosenthal M, et al. Mobilization practice in European ICUs and the impact of a structured sedation, analgesia and delirium training: a secondary analysis of data from the prospective, multicenter EuMAS study (abstract at ESICM LIVES, 22–26 October 2022, Paris, France). Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022;10(supplement 2):39.
Carrothers KM, Barr J, Spurlock B, et al. Contextual issues influencing implementation and outcomes associated with an integrated approach to managing pain, agitation, and delirium in adult ICUs. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):S128–35.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2c2b1
Liu K, Nakamura K, Katsukawa H, et al. ABCDEF bundle and supportive ICU practices for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection: an international point prevalence study. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3(3):1–16.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000353
Richards-Belle A, Canter RR, Power GS, et al. National survey and point prevalence study of sedation practice in UK critical care. Critical Care. 2016;20(1):355.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1532-x
Green LW. Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(suppl_1):i20–4.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn055
Dale CR, Kannas DA, Fan VS, et al. Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):367–74.
doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-210OC
Balas MC, Vasilevskis EE, Olsen KM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(5):1024–36.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000129