A Solution to the Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Transducer Placement Conundrum in Neurointensive Care? The Dual Transducer.
1. Background
Brain injury
Cerebrovascular monitoring
Critical care
Intracranial pressure
Patient monitoring
Pressure
Transducers
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2023
11 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
21
04
2023
accepted:
04
08
2023
medline:
12
9
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
entrez:
11
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Intracranial pressure is routinely monitored in most intensive care units caring for patients with severe neurological insults and, together with continuous arterial blood pressure measurement, allows for monitoring of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). CPP is the driving pressure of blood flow to the brain and is used to guide therapy. However, there is considerable inconsistency in the literature regarding how CPP is technically measured and, more specifically, the appropriate placement of the arterial pressure transducer. Depending on patient positioning and where the arterial pressure transducer is placed, the mean arterial pressure used for CPP calculation can vary widely by up to 15 mm Hg, which is greater than the acceptable variation in target ranges used clinically. Physiologically, the arterial pressure transducer should be placed at the level of the foramen of Monro for CPP measurement, but it is commonly set at the level of the right atrium for systematic measurement. Mean arterial pressure measurement at the level of the right atrium can lead to overestimation and potentially critically low actual CPP levels when the head is elevated, and measurement at the level of the foramen of Monro will underestimate systemic pressures, increasing the risk of excessive and unnecessary use of vasopressors and fluid. At the Karolinska University Hospital neurointensive care unit, we have used a split dual-transducer system, measuring arterial pressure both at the level of the foramen of Monro and at the level of the right atrium from a single arterial source. In doing so, we work with constants and can monitor and target optimum arterial pressures to better secure perfusion to all organs, with potentially less risk of cerebral ischemia or overuse of vasopressors and fluids, which may affect outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37697130
doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01829-8
pii: 10.1007/s12028-023-01829-8
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lassen NA. Cerebral Blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiol Rev. 1959;39(2):183–238.
doi: 10.1152/physrev.1959.39.2.183
Bouma GJ, Muizelaar JP, Bandoh K, Marmarou A. Blood pressure and intracranial pressure-volume dynamics in severe head injury: relationship with cerebral blood flow. J Neurosurg. 1992;77(1):15–9.
doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.77.1.0015
Jünger EC, Newell DW, Grant GA, et al. Cerebral autoregulation following minor head injury. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(3):425–32.
doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0425
Sahuquillo J, Munar F, Baguena M, Poca MA, Pedraza S, Rodríguez-Baeza A. Evaluation of cerebrovascular CO
Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. 4th ed. Palo Alto (CA): Brain Trauma Foundation; 2016.
McNett MM, Bader MK, Livesay S, et al. A national trial on differences in cerebral perfusion pressure values by measurement location. Neurocrit Care. 2018;28(2):221–8.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0467-7
Kosty JA, Leroux PD, Levine J, et al. A comparison of clinical and research practices in measuring cerebral perfusion pressure: a literature review and practitioner survey. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(3):694–8.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829cc765
Jones HA. Arterial transducer placement and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring: a discussion. Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14(6):303–10.
doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00352.x
Olson DM, Batjer HH, Abdulkadir K, Hall CE. Measuring and monitoring ICP in neurocritical care: results from a national practice survey. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20(1):15–20.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9847-9
McCann UG, Schiller HJ, Carney DE, et al. Invasive arterial BP monitoring in trauma and critical care. Chest. 2001;120(4):1322–6.
doi: 10.1378/chest.120.4.1322
McNett M, Livesay S, Yeager S, et al. The impact of head-of-bed positioning and transducer location on cerebral perfusion pressure measurement. J Neurosci Nurs. 2018;50(6):322–6.
doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000398
Gardner RM. Direct arterial pressure monitoring. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 1990;1:239–46.
doi: 10.1016/0953-7112(90)90008-P
Lamontagne F, Richards-Belle A, Thomas K, et al. Effect of reduced exposure to vasopressors on 90-day mortality in older critically ill patients with vasodilatory hypotension: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(10):938–49.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0930
Rao V, Klepstad P, Losvik OK, Solheim O. Confusion with cerebral perfusion pressure in a literature review of current guidelines and survey of clinical practice. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:78.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-78
Lele AV, Wilson D, Chalise P, Nazzaro J, Krishnamoorthy V, Vavilala MS. Differences in blood pressure by measurement technique in neurocritically ill patients: a technological assessment. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;47:97–102.
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.079
Wiegers EJA, Lingsma HF, Huijben JA, et al. Fluid balance and outcome in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI and OzENTER-TBI): a prospective, multicentre, comparative effectiveness study. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(8):627–38.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00162-9
Siaron KB, Cortes MX, Stutzman SE, Venkatachalam A, Ahmed KM, Olson DWM. Blood pressure measurements are site dependent in a cohort of patients with neurological illness. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3382.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60414-7
Ercole A. Attenuation in invasive blood pressure measurement systems. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(5):560–2.
doi: 10.1093/bja/ael070