Barriers and facilitators to the participation and engagement of primary care in shared-care arrangements with community mental health services for preventive care of people with serious mental illness: a scoping review.
General practice
Preventive care
Primary care
Serious or severe illness
Shared care
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Sep 2023
11 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
24
01
2023
accepted:
14
08
2023
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
entrez:
11
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People with serious mental illness die about 20 years earlier than the general population from preventable diseases. Shared-care arrangements between general practitioners and mental health services can improve consumers' access to preventive care, but implementing shared care is challenging. This scoping review sought to describe current evidence on the barriers and facilitators to the participation and engagement of primary care (specifically general practitioners) in shared-care arrangements with community mental health services for preventive health care of this population. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, APA PsychINFO and EBM Reviews from 2010 to 2022. Data was extracted against a Microsoft Excel template developed for the review. Data was synthesised through tabulation and narrative methods. We identified 295 records. After eligibility screening and full-text review, seven studies were included. Facilitators of engagement included a good fit with organisation and practice and opportunities to increase collaboration, specific roles to promote communication and coordination and help patients to navigate appointments, multidisciplinary teams and teamwork, and access to shared medical/health records. Barriers included a lack of willingness and motivation on the part of providers and low levels of confidence with tasks, lack of physical structures to produce capacity, poor alignment of funding/incentives, inability to share patient information and challenges engaging people with severe mental illness in the service and with their care. Our results were consistent with other research on shared care and suggests that the broader literature is likely to be applicable to the context of general practitioner/mental health services shared care. Specific challenges relating to this cohort present difficulties for recruitment and retention in shared care programs. Sharing "goals and knowledge, mutual respect" and engaging in "frequent, timely, accurate, problem-solving communication", supported by structures such as shared information systems are likely to engage primary care in shared care arrangements more than the traditional focus on incentives, education, and guidelines.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
People with serious mental illness die about 20 years earlier than the general population from preventable diseases. Shared-care arrangements between general practitioners and mental health services can improve consumers' access to preventive care, but implementing shared care is challenging. This scoping review sought to describe current evidence on the barriers and facilitators to the participation and engagement of primary care (specifically general practitioners) in shared-care arrangements with community mental health services for preventive health care of this population.
METHODS
METHODS
We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, APA PsychINFO and EBM Reviews from 2010 to 2022. Data was extracted against a Microsoft Excel template developed for the review. Data was synthesised through tabulation and narrative methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We identified 295 records. After eligibility screening and full-text review, seven studies were included. Facilitators of engagement included a good fit with organisation and practice and opportunities to increase collaboration, specific roles to promote communication and coordination and help patients to navigate appointments, multidisciplinary teams and teamwork, and access to shared medical/health records. Barriers included a lack of willingness and motivation on the part of providers and low levels of confidence with tasks, lack of physical structures to produce capacity, poor alignment of funding/incentives, inability to share patient information and challenges engaging people with severe mental illness in the service and with their care.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our results were consistent with other research on shared care and suggests that the broader literature is likely to be applicable to the context of general practitioner/mental health services shared care. Specific challenges relating to this cohort present difficulties for recruitment and retention in shared care programs. Sharing "goals and knowledge, mutual respect" and engaging in "frequent, timely, accurate, problem-solving communication", supported by structures such as shared information systems are likely to engage primary care in shared care arrangements more than the traditional focus on incentives, education, and guidelines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37697280
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09918-2
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-09918-2
pmc: PMC10494334
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
977Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):30-40
pubmed: 28127922
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;20(10):748-765
pubmed: 29722600
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;46(8):735-52
pubmed: 22696547
Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(2):156-82
pubmed: 24483334
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun 22;21(2):32
pubmed: 34220396
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;8(4):385-399
pubmed: 28196828
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 29;17:96
pubmed: 27473529
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):719
pubmed: 30223847
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Nov 21;5:31
pubmed: 22104323
Future Healthc J. 2018 Feb;5(1):64-80
pubmed: 31098535
Med J Aust. 2022 Oct 2;217 Suppl 7:S34-S35
pubmed: 36183319
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2:CD004910
pubmed: 28230899
Aust Prescr. 2017 Dec;40(6):231-236
pubmed: 29375185
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Jul 1;64(7):660-5
pubmed: 23584674
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;6(8):675-712
pubmed: 31324560
World Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;10(1):52-77
pubmed: 21379357
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 14;17(9):e1003284
pubmed: 32925912
Health Place. 2017 May;45:70-76
pubmed: 28288445
Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 12;2:12
pubmed: 23402391
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;47(4):333-46
pubmed: 23076548
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105964
pubmed: 32087336
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Apr;49(2):172-7
pubmed: 22825567
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;72(4):334-41
pubmed: 25671328
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2015 Jul;51(3):162-70
pubmed: 24957751
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Aust J Rural Health. 2010 Dec;18(6):217-22
pubmed: 21114697
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):844
pubmed: 32907559
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;51(8):799-809
pubmed: 28718716
J Affect Disord. 2017 May;214:26-43
pubmed: 28266319
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):977
pubmed: 37697280