Acute-on-chronic liver failure alters linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with continuous hemodialysis: an observational study.

Antibiotics Integrated dialysis pharmacometric model Intensive care Monte-Carlo simulation Population pharmacokinetics Probability of target attainment Target attainment Volume of distribution

Journal

Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 25 05 2023
accepted: 01 09 2023
medline: 12 9 2023
pubmed: 12 9 2023
entrez: 12 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), adequate antibiotic dosing is challenging due to changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous renal replacement therapy compared to patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF). In this prospective cohort study, patients received linezolid 600 mg bid. Linezolid serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed followed by Monte-Carlo simulations of 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 450 mg bid, 600 mg bid, and 900 mg bid to assess trough concentration target attainment of 2-7 mg/L. Eighteen patients were included in this study with nine suffering from ACLF. Linezolid body clearance was lower in the ACLF group with mean (standard deviation) 1.54 (0.52) L/h versus 6.26 (2.43) L/h for NLF, P < 0.001. A trough concentration of 2-7 mg/L was reached with the standard dose of 600 mg bid in the NLF group in 47%, with 42% being underexposed and 11% overexposed versus 20% in the ACLF group with 77% overexposed and 3% underexposed. The highest probability of target exposure was attained with 600 mg bid in the NLF group and 150 mg bid in the ACLF group with 53%. Linezolid body clearance in ACLF was markedly lower than in NLF. Given the overall high variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with dose adjustments seems required to optimize target attainment. Until TDM results are available, a dose reduction may be considered in ACLF patients to prevent overexposure.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), adequate antibiotic dosing is challenging due to changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous renal replacement therapy compared to patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).
METHODS METHODS
In this prospective cohort study, patients received linezolid 600 mg bid. Linezolid serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed followed by Monte-Carlo simulations of 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 450 mg bid, 600 mg bid, and 900 mg bid to assess trough concentration target attainment of 2-7 mg/L.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eighteen patients were included in this study with nine suffering from ACLF. Linezolid body clearance was lower in the ACLF group with mean (standard deviation) 1.54 (0.52) L/h versus 6.26 (2.43) L/h for NLF, P < 0.001. A trough concentration of 2-7 mg/L was reached with the standard dose of 600 mg bid in the NLF group in 47%, with 42% being underexposed and 11% overexposed versus 20% in the ACLF group with 77% overexposed and 3% underexposed. The highest probability of target exposure was attained with 600 mg bid in the NLF group and 150 mg bid in the ACLF group with 53%.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Linezolid body clearance in ACLF was markedly lower than in NLF. Given the overall high variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with dose adjustments seems required to optimize target attainment. Until TDM results are available, a dose reduction may be considered in ACLF patients to prevent overexposure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37698659
doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01184-z
pii: 10.1186/s13613-023-01184-z
pmc: PMC10497461
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

83

Subventions

Organisme : Damp Stiftung
ID : 2017-20

Informations de copyright

© 2023. La Société de Réanimation de Langue Francaise = The French Society of Intensive Care (SRLF).

Références

Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(7):1426-37, 1437.e1-9
pubmed: 23474284
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;79(1):149-157
pubmed: 36434292
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):86-7
pubmed: 12510056
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Jun;61(6):789-817
pubmed: 35699914
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Mar;66(3):291-8
pubmed: 20013257
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 19;20(1):374
pubmed: 27863531
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Feb 28;15(3):
pubmed: 35337094
Hepatology. 2019 Jan;69(1):258-269
pubmed: 30070381
Drug Metab Dispos. 2001 Aug;29(8):1136-45
pubmed: 11454733
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(15):1411-23
pubmed: 14674791
J Infect Chemother. 2011 Jun;17(3):388-91
pubmed: 21161560
Microorganisms. 2021 Oct 03;9(10):
pubmed: 34683408
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Oct;54(4):780-4
pubmed: 15347636
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 Sep;79(3):241-57
pubmed: 16023764
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 May;51 Suppl 2:ii9-16
pubmed: 12730138
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Nov;60(5):1085-90
pubmed: 17855725
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 14;19:164
pubmed: 25888449
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(13):1129-40
pubmed: 14531724
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Dec;42(6):721-8
pubmed: 10052894
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1127-1153
pubmed: 32383061
Gut. 2018 Oct;67(10):1870-1880
pubmed: 28847867
Drug Metab Dispos. 2022 Apr;50(4):413-421
pubmed: 35042700
Liver Int. 2017 Jun;37(6):843-850
pubmed: 28211257
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Nov;113(8):649-657
pubmed: 28210759
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Sep;47(9):2775-80
pubmed: 12936973
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 May;40(3):442-9
pubmed: 22577909
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 15;48(2):203-12
pubmed: 19072714
Pharm Res. 2020 May 14;37(6):96
pubmed: 32409892
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247
pubmed: 34599691
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e12114
pubmed: 30200095
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):48
pubmed: 32323030
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;16(7):833-843
pubmed: 28538105
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 May;55(5):1867-73
pubmed: 21357301

Auteurs

Tjokosela Tikiso (T)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Bundesstraße 45, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.

Valentin Fuhrmann (V)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medicine, Hospital of the Holy Spirit, Graseggerstraße 105, 50737, Cologne, Germany.

Christina König (C)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Dominik Jarczak (D)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Stefanie Iwersen-Bergmann (S)

Department of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Stefan Kluge (S)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Sebastian G Wicha (SG)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Bundesstraße 45, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.

Jörn Grensemann (J)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. j.grensemann@uke.de.

Classifications MeSH