Linear programming the Ramsar convention's criterion IV (case study: Shadegan Wetland, West Asia).
Linear programming (LP)
Montreux Record
Ramsar Convention
Shadegan Wetland
Journal
Environmental monitoring and assessment
ISSN: 1573-2959
Titre abrégé: Environ Monit Assess
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8508350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Sep 2023
12 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2022
accepted:
30
08
2023
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
entrez:
12
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Wetland ecosystems provide critical ecological services to both humans and wildlife. However, many wetlands around the world are facing challenges that threaten their ecological integrity and jeopardize their status as Ramsar Convention sites. The Shadegan Wetland, a Ramsar site since 1975, has been on the Montreux Record since 1993 due to changing conditions in the wetland. This study aims to utilize linear programming (LP) techniques to evaluate the status of criterion IV of the Ramsar Convention within the Shadegan Wetland. Using mathematical language and Excel software, we defined criterion IV and developed a linear model. The Lingo software was employed to verify the model by setting constraints for proxy variables (X variables). We selected constraints based on extreme climatic conditions, such as energy and water limitations, during the study period while considering the trend of each variable. By identifying effective interventions for promoting sustainable use of the wetland while preserving its ecological balance, the LP can support the efforts to re-nominate the Shadegan Wetland as a Ramsar site. Considering the critical conditions, the lowest value of Z in the studied period unravels the critical year as the target. Based on the result, 2015 with the lowest value of the Z index (- 0.36) was identified as the critical year in the entire study period starting from 2001-2019. In the critical year itself, the population of birds equals 50,000 birds, while the average population of birds over the course of the past 20 years was nearly 37,000 birds.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37698676
doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11809-2
pii: 10.1007/s10661-023-11809-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1194Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Références
Breslaw, J. A. (1976). A linear programming solution to the faculty assignment problem. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 10(6), 227–230.
doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(76)90008-2
Cai, B., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., & Li, Y. (2018). An optimization model for a wetland restoration project under uncertainty. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(12), 2795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122795
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122795
Conly, F. M., & Van Der Kamp, G. (2001). Monitoring the hydrology of Canadian prairie wetlands to detect the effects of climate change and land use changes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 67, 195–215.
doi: 10.1023/A:1006486607040
Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Crivelli, A., Catsadorakis, G., Hatzilacou, D., & Nazirides, T. (1997). Pelecanus crispus Dalmatian pelican. Birds of the Western Palearctic Update, 1, 149–153.
Crocker, R., Blake, W. H., Hutchinson, T. H., & Comber, S. (2021). Spatial distribution of sediment phosphorus in a Ramsar Wetland. Science of The Total Environment, 765, 142749.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142749
Davidson, N. C., Van Dam, A. A., Finlayson, C. M., & McInnes, R. J. (2019). Worth of wetlands: Revised global monetary values of coastal and inland wetland ecosystem services. Marine Freshwater Research, 70(8), 1189. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf18391
doi: 10.1071/mf18391
Dawson, L., Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., & Gordon, J. (2017). Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: Learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.019
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.019
Department of Environment. (2021). Deputy of Natural Environment. Annual Report.
Feylizadeh, M. R., Mahmoudi, A., Bagherpour, M., & Li, D. F. (2018). Project crashing using a fuzzy multi-objective model considering time, cost, quality and risk under fast tracking technique: A case study. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(3), 3615–3631. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18171
doi: 10.3233/JIFS-18171
Gainey, K. W. (1998). Determination of possible wetland mitigation sites using NC-CREWS and an integer linear programming formulation.
Honarbakhsh, A., Pazhohesh, M., Zangiabadi, M., & Heidari, M. (2017). Land use optimization using a combination of fuzzy linear programming methods and multi-objective land allocation (Case study: Chelgard watershed). Echo Hydrology, 3 (3): 363-377. https://doi.org/10.29252/jwmr.8.16.241
Hughes, J. M. R., & Heathwaite, A. L. (1995). Introduction. In: Hughes, J.M.R., Heathwaite, A.L. (Eds.), Hydrology and hydrochemistry of British wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chinchester, UK, pp. 1–8. in the UK. Journal of Environmental Management, 135, 54–62.
IPBES. (2018). Summary for policymakers of the thematic assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
Jie, L. I. (2021). A simulation approach to optimizing the vegetation covers under the water constraint in the Yellow River Basin. Forest Policy and Economics, 123, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1638-6
Lyons, J. E., Kalasz, K. S., Breese, G., & Boal, C. W. (2020). Resource allocation for coastal wetland management: Confronting uncertainty about sea level rise.
Manton, M., & Angelstam, P. (2018). Defining benchmarks for restoration of green infrastructure: A case study combining the historical range of variability of habitat and species’ requirements. Sustainability, 10(2), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020326
doi: 10.3390/su10020326
Mirzaei, A., & Zibaei, M. (2021). Water conflict management between agriculture and wetland under climate change: Application of economic-hydrological-behavioral modelling. Water Resources Management, 35(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02703-4
doi: 10.1007/s11269-020-02703-4
Mix, H. M., & Bräunlich, A. (2000). Dalmatian pelican. In R. P. Reading & B. Miller (Eds.), Endangered animals: A reference guide to conflicting issues (pp. 78–83). Greenwood.
Ockenden, M. C., Deasy, C., Quinton, J. N., Surridge, B., & Stoate, C. (2014). Keeping agricultural soil out of rivers: Evidence of sediment and nutrient accumulation within field wetlands in the UK. Journal of Environmental Management, 135, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.015
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.015
Rafie, A., & Danehkar, A. (2021). Natural appearance and environmental features of Shadegan Wetland. Iranian Journal of Nature, 6(4), 135–146.
Rafiei, A., Danehkar, A., Zand Basiri, M., & Bagherzadeh Karimi, M. (2020). Application of linear programming in measuring the feasibility of Shadegan Wetland index according to the criteria of Ramsar Convention. Environmental Science, 46(3), 421–436.
Ramsar Convention Secretariat (Ed.). (2016). An introduction to the convention on wetlands, 7th ed. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
Ramsar Convention. (2020). List of wetlands of international importance included in the Montreux Record. https://www.ramsar.org/document/list-of-wetlands-of-international-importance-included-in-the-montreux-record
Ramsar Convention. (2021). Ramsar information sheet (RIS) Shadegan marshes & mudflats of Khor-al Amaya & Khor Musa. https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/41
Ramsar Convention. (2022). About the convention on wetlands (number and area of wetlands). https://www.ramsar.org/
Ramsar, C. (2009). What are criteria main ramsar [Online]. Available: http://archive.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-about-faqs
Ramsar, C. (2010). About Montreux Record [Online]. Available: http://www.ramsar.org/about/about_montreux_max_.htm
Roodbergen, M., van der Werf, B., & Hötker, H. (2012). Revealing the contributions of reproduction and survival to the Europe-wide decline in meadow birds: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Ornithology, 153(53), 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0733-y
doi: 10.1007/s10336-011-0733-y
Runting, R. K., Lovelock, C. E., Beyer, H. L., & Rhodes, J. R. (2017). Costs and opportunities for preserving coastal wetlands under sea level rise. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12239
doi: 10.1111/conl.12239
Schuster, R., Hanson, J. O., Strimas-Mackey, M., & Bennett, J. R. (2020). Exact integer linear programming solvers outperform simulated annealing for solving conservation planning problems. PeerJ, 8, e9258. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9258
SilviusM, OnekaM., & VerhagenA,. (2000). Wetlands: Lifeline for people at the edge. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 25(7–8), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-1909(00)00079-4
doi: 10.1016/s1464-1909(00)00079-4
Sun, L., & Zhu, Z. (2019). Linear programming Monte Carlo method based on remote sensing for ecological restoration of degraded ecosystem. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 295, No. 2, p. 012041). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012202
Tuboi, C., Irengbam, M., & Hussain, S. A. (2018). Seasonal variations in the water quality of a tropical wetland dominated by floating meadows and its implication for conservation of Ramsar Wetlands. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 103, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2017.09.001
Valasiuk, S., Giergiczny, M., Żylicz, T., Klimkowska, A., & Angelstam, P. (2018). Conservation of disappearing cultural landscape’s biodiversity: Are people in Belarus willing to pay for wet grassland restoration? Wetlands Ecology and Management, 26(5), 943–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-018-9622-y
doi: 10.1007/s11273-018-9622-y
Van Doren, B. M. (2022). How migratory birds might have tracked past climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(3), e2121738119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121738119
Vanderbei, R. J. (2015). Linear programming (Vol. 3). Springer.
Vilkov, E. V. (2022). Population trends of Anseriformes and Charadriiformes on the west coast of the middle Caspian Sea. Journal of Wildlife and biodiversity, 6(Suppl. 1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7316905
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7316905
Wang, C. (2018). Study on wetland ecosystem health by using linear programming model – Taking Futian mangrovewetland as an example. Journal of Jiamusi University (Natural Science Edition), 36(03), 423–425.
Yang, L., Cong, W., Meng, C., Cai, B., & Liu, M. (2020). An interval fuzzy, double-sided, chance-constrained stochastic programming model for planning the ecological service value of interconnected river systems. Water, 12(9), 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092649
doi: 10.3390/w12092649
Zhang, Y., & Shen, J. (2021). Wetland restoration planning approach based on interval fuzzy linear programming under uncertainty. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 9549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189549
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189549