ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes.
Atrophic maxilla
Complications
Edentulous
Survival
Zygomatic implants
Journal
International journal of implant dentistry
ISSN: 2198-4034
Titre abrégé: Int J Implant Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101676532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 09 2023
12 09 2023
Historique:
received:
02
06
2023
accepted:
25
08
2023
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
entrez:
12
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the ITI Consensus Workshop on zygomatic implants was to provide Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for the use of zygomatic implants. Three systematic reviews and one narrative review were written to address focused questions on (1) the indications for the use of zygomatic implants; (2) the survival rates and complications associated with surgery in zygomatic implant placement; (3) long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants and (4) the biomechanical principles involved when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads. Based on the reviews, three working groups then developed Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations. These were discussed in a plenary and finalized in Delphi rounds. A total of 21 Consensus Statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 17 Clinical Recommendations based on the Consensus Statements and the combined expertise of the participants. Zygomatic implants are mainly indicated in cases with maxillary bone atrophy or deficiency. Long-term mean zygomatic implant survival was 96.2% [95% CI 93.8; 97.7] over a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (6.3 years) with a follow-up range of 36-141.6 months (3-11.8 years). Immediate loading showed a statistically significant increase in survival over delayed loading. Sinusitis presented with a total prevalence of 14.2% [95% CI 8.8; 22.0] over a mean 65.4 months follow-up, representing the most common complication which may lead to zygomatic implant loss. The international experts suggested clinical recommendations regarding planning, surgery, restoration, outcomes, and the patient's perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37698775
doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9
pii: 10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9
pmc: PMC10497463
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
28Informations de copyright
© 2023. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Implantologie im Zahn‐, Mund‐ und Kieferbereich e.V., Japanese Society of Oral Implantology.
Références
Polido WD, Machado-Fernandez A, Lin WS, Aghaloo T. Indications for zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Int J implant Dent. 2023;9(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00480-4
pubmed: 37391575
pmcid: 10313639
Kammerer PW, Fan S, Aparicio C, Bedrossian E, Davo R, Morton D, et al. Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00478-y
pubmed: 37198345
pmcid: 10192488
Bedrossian E, Brunski J, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW. Zygoma implant under function: biomechanical principles clarified. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):15.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00483-1
pubmed: 37347335
pmcid: 10287889
Brennand Roper M, Vissink A, Dudding T, Pollard A, Gareb B, Malevez C, et al. Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):21.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x
pubmed: 37405545
pmcid: 10322814