Estimating effective reproduction number revisited.
COVID-19
Effective reproduction number
Epidemic model
Overdispersion
Journal
Infectious Disease Modelling
ISSN: 2468-0427
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Model
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101692406
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
30
04
2023
revised:
24
07
2023
accepted:
27
08
2023
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
13
9
2023
entrez:
13
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurately estimating the effective reproduction number is crucial for characterizing the transmissibility of infectious diseases to optimize interventions and responses during epidemic outbreaks. In this study, we improve the estimation of the effective reproduction number through two main approaches. First, we derive a discrete model to represent a time series of case counts and propose an estimation method based on this framework. We also conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed discretization scheme. By doing so, we enhance the accuracy of approximating the underlying epidemic process compared to previous methods, even when the counting period is similar to the mean generation time of an infectious disease. Second, we employ a negative binomial distribution to model the variability of count data to accommodate overdispersion. Specifically, given that observed incidence counts follow a negative binomial distribution, the posterior distribution of secondary infections is obtained as a Dirichlet multinomial distribution. With this formulation, we establish posterior uncertainty bounds for the effective reproduction number. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using incidence data from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37701756
doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.08.006
pii: S2468-0427(23)00082-9
pmc: PMC10493262
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1063-1078Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jan 29;17(1):e1008679
pubmed: 33513137
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 7;17(9):e1009347
pubmed: 34492011
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Sep 15;160(6):509-16
pubmed: 15353409
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 22;2(8):e758
pubmed: 17712406
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1714-1719
pubmed: 32943787
Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):355-9
pubmed: 16292310
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 16;18(6):e0287389
pubmed: 37327242
Epidemics. 2019 Dec;29:100356
pubmed: 31624039
Infect Dis Model. 2017 Feb 04;2(2):113-127
pubmed: 29928732
PLoS One. 2008 May 14;3(5):e2185
pubmed: 18478118
Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Apr;136(4):562-6
pubmed: 17568476
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Nov 1;178(9):1505-12
pubmed: 24043437
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan;12(1):110-3
pubmed: 16494726
Science. 2021 Jan 15;371(6526):
pubmed: 33234698
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:284-286
pubmed: 32145466
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Dec 10;16(12):e1008409
pubmed: 33301457