Anatomical distribution of endometriosis: A cross-sectional analysis of transvaginal ultrasound in symptomatic patients.
diagnosis
diagnostic imaging
endometriosis
symptoms
ultrasonography
Journal
Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine
ISSN: 2205-0140
Titre abrégé: Australas J Ultrasound Med
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101583539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
19
01
2024
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
13
9
2023
entrez:
13
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The anatomical distribution of deep endometriosis (DE) is essential in treating patients with symptoms associated with the disease. There is an evidence gap in correlating clinical features and symptoms with disease patterns. The study aimed at determining DE anatomic distribution based on advanced transvaginal ultrasound and describe the relationship with symptoms obtained with the World Endometriosis Foundation Questionnaire. A cross-sectional study included 549 ultrasound results and 370 questionnaire responses between July 2018 and January 2021. Descriptive statistics are presented. Continuous variables were compared by a simple The anatomical locations with signs of endometriosis on ultrasound were the right uterosacral ligament (USL) 23.3% (n = 128), left USL 21.3% (n = 117) and bowel 19.1% (n = 105). Endometriomas in the right and left ovaries (14%, n = 77, and 14.7%, n = 81 respectively), superficial endometriosis in 15.5% (n = 85), torus uterinus in 11.7% (n = 64), Pouch of Douglas (POD) in 9.7% (n = 53), rectovaginal septum in 4.2% (n = 23), vaginal fornix in 3.5% (n = 19). A negative 'sliding-sign' was noted in 25.3% (n = 139), and ovarian medial immobility was noted frequently (left 20.2%, n = 111 and right 16.9%, n = 93). Dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, infertility and family history were associated with endometriosis lesions (P < 0.05). Prediction models based on symptomatology presented low discriminatory power. This large real-life cohort associating the description of the anatomical distribution of endometriosis as seen on advanced TVS in symptomatic patients confirmed that uterosacral ligaments, torus uterinus, ovaries and bowel represent the most common anatomical sites of endometriosis. Also, the dynamic abnormalities elicited via ultrasound, such as the uterus 'sliding-sign' and ovarian mobility, remain common. The knowledge of the general locations of identifiable endometriosis on ultrasound and the dynamic abnormalities is essential to sonologists and sonographers in implementing advanced TVS protocols to detect endometriosis. In addition, the different presentations of dyspareunia can be associated with USL and bowel endometriosis. Subfertility might also be associated with USL, ovarian and bowel endometriosis. Nevertheless, prediction models showed suboptimal results. Endometriosis is mainly distributed in USLs, bowel and ovaries. POD obliteration is frequent. Symptoms can be associated with anatomic locations; however, prediction models showed low clinical applicability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37701766
doi: 10.1002/ajum.12327
pii: AJUM12327
pmc: PMC10493340
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
131-141Informations de copyright
© 2023 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Rodrigo Manieri Rocha and Allie Eathorne report nothing to disclose. Mathew Leonardi reports grants from the Australian Women and Children's Research Foundation, outside the submitted work. George Condous reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from GE Healthcare and grants from the Australian Women and Children's Research Foundation, outside the submitted work. Mike Armour reports grants from Metagenics and Spectrum outside the submitted work.
Références
Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):315-324
pubmed: 27920089
Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):157-61
pubmed: 12525459
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:124-133
pubmed: 33932683
Reprod Sci. 2017 Feb;24(2):202-226
pubmed: 27368878
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16253
pubmed: 33004965
Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1244-53
pubmed: 25256928
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):318-32
pubmed: 27349699
J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Jun;40(6):1091-1096
pubmed: 32894615
Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1223-32
pubmed: 25256930
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov - Dec;24(7):1170-1176
pubmed: 28694166
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;59(3):385-391
pubmed: 34919760
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Mar - Apr;26(3):477-483
pubmed: 29890354
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 26;2022(2):hoac009
pubmed: 35350465
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:171-178
pubmed: 30708269
BMC Womens Health. 2013 Oct 29;13:43
pubmed: 24165087
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;58(6):926-932
pubmed: 34090310
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:36-40
pubmed: 30240947
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;142(2):131-142
pubmed: 29729099