The Serpentine Sign: A Reliable Endoscopic and Radiographic Finding in Empty Nose Syndrome.

ENS empty nose syndrome mucosal hypertrophy paradoxical nasal obstruction suffocation turbinate reduction turbinectomy turbinoplasty upper airway

Journal

The Laryngoscope
ISSN: 1531-4995
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8607378

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Sep 2023
Historique:
revised: 06 07 2023
received: 16 05 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 13 9 2023
pubmed: 13 9 2023
entrez: 13 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is a relatively uncommon disease that greatly impacts the quality of life and presents diagnostic challenges. We sought to identify objective clinical findings unique to patients with ENS, and in doing so identified compensatory mucosal hypertrophy in an alternating, undulating swelling on endoscopy and coronal computerized tomography (CT) that we have termed the "Serpentine Sign." Here, we investigated whether this radiographic finding is a reliable manifestation in ENS patients. Retrospective review was undertaken to identify ENS patients with past turbinoplasty, an ENS6Q score of at least 11/30, and symptomatic improvement with the cotton placement test. Control patients without complaints of ENS symptoms (ENS6Q < 11) were identified for comparison. ENS and control patients had coronal CT imaging available to evaluate for the Serpentine Sign, as well as ENS6Q scores, and histologic analysis of nasal tissue. 34 ENS and 74 control patients were evaluated for the presence of the Serpentine Sign. Of the 34 patients with ENS, 18 exhibited this radiographic finding on CT imaging (52.9%) compared to 0 of the 74 control patients (p < 0.0001). Further analysis demonstrated that ENS patients with the Serpentine Sign had lower median scores on ENS6Q than ENS patients without (17.5 vs. 22, p = 0.033). Histology revealed disorganized subepithelium rich in seromucinous glands similar to the nasal septum swell body. The "Serpentine Sign" is a unique presentation of hypertrophic change to the nasal septum soft tissue that is specific to ENS patients and may serve as a reliable radiographic and endoscopic finding in diagnosis. IV Laryngoscope, 2023.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37702458
doi: 10.1002/lary.30938
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Références

Manji J, Nayak JV, Thamboo A. The functional and psychological burden of empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(6):707-712. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22097.
Malik J, Thamboo A, Dholakia S, et al. The cotton test redistributes nasal airflow in patients with empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10(4):539-545. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22489.
Houser SM. Surgical treatment for empty nose syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(9):858-863. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.133.9.858.
Jung JH, Baguindali MA, Park JT, Jang YJ. Costal cartilage is a superior implant material than conchal cartilage in the treatment of empty nose syndrome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(3):500-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813491223.
Velasquez N, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Nayak JV. Inferior turbinate reconstruction using porcine small intestine submucosal xenograft demonstrates improved quality of life outcomes in patients with empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(11):1077-1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21633.
Lee TJ, Fu CH, Wu CL, et al. Surgical outcome for empty nose syndrome: impact of implantation site. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(3):554-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26769.
Max ZX, Quan Z, Jie L, Hu GH. Assessment of postsurgical outcomes between different implants in patients with empty nose syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(6):1939-1948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517715167.
Thamboo A, Dholakia SS, Borchard NA, et al. Inferior Meatus Augmentation Procedure (IMAP) to Treat Empty Nose Syndrome: A Pilot Study-PubMed. Accessed April 14, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31935161/.
Dholakia SS, Yang A, Kim D, et al. Long-term outcomes of inferior meatus augmentation procedure to treat empty nose syndrome. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(11):E2736-E2741. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29593.
Borchard NA, Dholakia SS, Yan CH, Zarabanda D, Thamboo A, Nayak JV. Use of intranasal submucosal fillers as a transient implant to alter upper airway aerodynamics: implications for the assessment of empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;9(6):681-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22299.
Modrzyński M. Hyaluronic acid gel in the treatment of empty nose syndrome. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25(2):103-106. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3577.
Coste A, Dessi P, Serrano E. Empty nose syndrome. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2012;129(2):93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2012.02.001.
Chang MT, Bartho M, Kim D, et al. Inferior meatus augmentation procedure (IMAP) for treatment of empty nose syndrome. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(6):1285-1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30001.
Talmadge J, Nayak JV, Yao W, Citardi MJ. Management of postsurgical empty nose syndrome. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019;27(4):465-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2019.07.005.
Velasquez N, Thamboo A, Habib ARR, Huang Z, Nayak JV. The empty nose syndrome 6-item questionnaire (ENS6Q): a validated 6-item questionnaire as a diagnostic aid for empty nose syndrome patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(1):64-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21842.
Amanian A, Hari K, Habib AR, Dholakia SS, Nayak J, Thamboo A. The empty nose syndrome 6-item questionnaire (ENS6Q): a diagnostic tool to distinguish empty nose syndrome from primary nasal obstruction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021;11(7):1113-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22761.
Thamboo A, Velasquez N, Habib ARR, Zarabanda D, Paknezhad H, Nayak JV. Defining surgical criteria for empty nose syndrome: validation of the office-based cotton test and clinical interpretability of the validated empty nose syndrome 6-item questionnaire. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(8):1746-1752. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26549.
Gill AS, Said M, Tollefson TT, Strong EB, Nayak JV, Steele TO. Patient-reported outcome measures and provocative testing in the workup of empty nose syndrome-advances in diagnosis: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020;34(1):134-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892419880642.
Thamboo A, Velasquez N, Ayoub N, Nayak JV. Distinguishing computed tomography findings in patients with empty nose syndrome. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(10):1075-1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21774.
Jang YJ, Kim JH, Song HY. Empty nose syndrome: radiologic findings and treatment outcomes of endonasal microplasty using cartilage implants. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(6):1308-1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21734.
Wise SK, Damask C, Roland LT, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: allergic rhinitis - 2023. Int Forum Aller Rhinol. 2023;13(4):293-859. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23090.
Malik J, Dholakia S, Spector BM, et al. Inferior meatus augmentation procedure (IMAP) normalizes nasal airflow patterns in empty nose syndrome patients via computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021;11(5):902-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22720.
Li C, Farag AA, Maza G, et al. Investigation of the abnormal nasal aerodynamics and trigeminal functions among empty nose syndrome patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(3):444-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22045.
Frączek M, Masalski M, Guziński M. Reliability of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018;27(4):541-545. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/80858.
Wexler D, Braverman I, Amar M. Histology of the nasal septal swell body (septal turbinate). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(4):596-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.058.
Kim DH, Park HY, Kim HS, et al. Effect of septoplasty on inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(4):419-423. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.4.419.

Auteurs

Sachi S Dholakia (SS)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

David Grimm (D)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Rachel Daum (R)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Dawn T Bravo (DT)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Nicole Salvi (N)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

David Zarabanda (D)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Jonathan B Overdevest (JB)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Andrew Thamboo (A)

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Tsuguhisa Nakayama (T)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Jayakar V Nayak (JV)

Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH