Posterior Wall Isolation Improves Outcomes for Persistent AF With Rapid Posterior Wall Activity: CAPLA Substudy.

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less effective in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) than in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA randomized clinical trial) of PVI vs posterior wall isolation (PWI) did not support empiric PWI in PerAF. We examined pulmonary vein (PV) and posterior wall (PW) electrical characteristics to determine if select patients may benefit from additional PWI.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the impact of PV and PW electrical characteristics on AF ablation outcomes in the CAPLA randomized study.

METHODS

Participants in spontaneous AF at the time of ablation were included from the CAPLA study. The mean, shortest, and longest PV, PW, and left atrial (LA) appendage cycle length measurements were annotated preablation using a multipolar catheter for 100 consecutive cycles. Next, cardioversion was performed with a high-density LA voltage map completed. Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to determine clinical and electroanatomic predictors of AF recurrence overall and according to ablation strategy. Follow-up included twice daily single-lead electrocardiograms or continuous monitoring for 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients (27% female, age 65 ± 9 years, 18% long-standing PerAF, LA volume index 52 ± 16 mL/m

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid PW activity is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence post-catheter ablation. The addition of PWI in this subgroup was associated with a significant improvement in freedom from AF compared with PVI alone. The presence of rapid PW activity may identify patients with PerAF likely to benefit from PWI.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study received seed grant funding from the Baker Department of Cardiometabolic Health, University of Melbourne. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The funding source has no right to veto publication or control the decision regarding to which journal the paper was submitted. Dr Segan was supported by a cofunded National Health and Medical Research Council/National Heart Foundation postgraduate scholarship. Dr Lee has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster. Dr Pathak has served on the advisory board of Medtronic, Abbott Medical, and Boston Scientific; and received funding for research and consultancy from Medtronic, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik. Dr Ginks has received funding for speaking engagements from Abbott and Biosense Webster. Dr Kalman has received fellowship support from Medtronic and Biosense Webster. Dr Kistler has received funding from Abbott Medical for consultancy and speaking engagements; and served on the advisory board with fellowship support from Biosense Webster. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.