Automated extraction of biplanar stereo-radiographic image measurements: Mizzou 3D SPinE.
Biplanar radiography
Data extraction
Longitudinal assessments
Spine deformity
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2023
13 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
08
06
2023
accepted:
19
08
2023
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
13
9
2023
entrez:
13
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Although several studies have reported on the application of biplanar stereo-radiographic technology in pediatric clinical practice, few have performed large-scale analyses. The manual extraction of these types of data is time-consuming, which often precludes physicians and scientists from effectively utilizing these valuable measurements. To fill the critical gap between clinical assessments and large-scale evidence-based research, we have addressed one of the primary hurdles in using data derived from these types of imaging modalities in pediatric clinical practice by developing an application to automatically transcribe and aggregate three-dimensional measurements in a manner that facilitates statistical analyses. Mizzou 3D SPinE was developed using R software; the application, instructions, and process were beta tested with four separate testers. We compared 1309 manually compiled three-dimensional deformity measurements derived from thirty-five biplanar three-dimensional reconstructions (image sets) from ten pediatric patients to those derived from Mizzou 3D SPinE. We assessed the difference between manually entered values and extracted values using a Fisher's exact test. Mizzou 3D SPinE significantly reduced the duration of data entry (95.8%) while retaining 100% accuracy. Manually compiled data resulted in an error rate of 1.58%, however, the magnitude of errors ranged from 5.97 to 2681.82% significantly increased the transcription accuracy (p value < 0.0001) while also significantly reducing transcription time (0.33 vs. 8.08 min). Mizzou 3D SPinE is an essential component in improving evidence-based patient care by allowing clinicians and scientists to quickly compile three-dimensional data at regular intervals in an automated, efficient manner without transcription errors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37702985
doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00761-3
pii: 10.1007/s43390-023-00761-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Références
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3
pubmed: 18456103
Nash CLJ, Gregg EC, Brown RH, Pillai K (1979) Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis. JBJS 61:371–374
doi: 10.2106/00004623-197961030-00009
Simony A, Hansen EJ, Christensen SB, Carreon LY, Andersen MO (2016) Incidence of cancer in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated 25 years previously. Eur Spine J 25:3366–3370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4747-2
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4747-2
pubmed: 27592106
Simony A, Carreon LY, Jensen KE, Christensen SB, Andersen MO (2015) Incidence of cancer and infertility in patients treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 25 years prior. Spine J 15:S112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.076
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.076
Bone CM, Hsieh GH (2000) The risk of carcinogenesis from radiographs to pediatric orthopaedic patients. J Pediatr Orthop 20:251–254
doi: 10.1097/01241398-200003000-00023
pubmed: 10739292
Illés T, Somoskeöy S (2012) The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice. Int Orthop 36:1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1512-y
doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1512-y
pubmed: 22371113
pmcid: 3385897
McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R, Yang H, Stirk L, Gummerson N, Sculpher M, Woolacott N (2012) EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16140
doi: 10.3310/hta16140
pubmed: 23177626
pmcid: 4781036
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Shamji MF, Brodke D, Lenke LG, Fehlings MG, Lafage V, Schwab F, Vaccaro AR, Ames CP (2017) Recent and emerging advances in spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 80:S70–S85. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw048
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw048
pubmed: 28350940
Diab M, Landman Z, Lubicky J, Dormans J, Erickson M, Richards BS (2011) Use and outcome of MRI in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36:667–671. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181da218c
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181da218c
pubmed: 21178850
Pennington Z, Cottrill E, Westbroek EM, Goodwin ML, Lubelski D, Ahmed AK, Sciubba DM (2019) Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature. Spine J 19:1397–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.003
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.003
pubmed: 30974238
Torell G, Nachemson A, Haderspeck-Grib K, Schultz A (1985) Standing and supine cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:425–427
doi: 10.1097/00007632-198506000-00004
pubmed: 4049109
Yazici M, Acaroglu ER, Alanay A, Deviren V, Cila A, Surat A (2001) Measurement of vertebral rotation in standing versus supine position in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 21:252
doi: 10.1097/01241398-200103000-00025
pubmed: 11242262
Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Caseiro G, Watanabe K (2018) Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2355-5
doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2355-5
pubmed: 30522465
pmcid: 6284293
Garg B, Mehta N, Bansal T, Malhotra R (2020) EOS® imaging: concept and current applications in spinal disorders. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11:786–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.012
pubmed: 32879565
pmcid: 7452333
Kato S, Debaud C, Zeller RD (2017) Three-dimensional EOS analysis of apical vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37:e543–e547. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000776
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000776
pubmed: 27137906
Humbert L, De Guise JA, Aubert B, Godbout B, Skalli W (2009) 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys 31:681–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.01.003
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.01.003
pubmed: 19230743
Cobetto N, Parent S, Aubin C-E (2018) 3D correction over 2 years with anterior vertebral body growth modulation: a finite element analysis of screw positioning, cable tensioning and postoperative functional activities. Clin Biomech 51:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.11.007
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.11.007
Guy A, Coulombe M, Labelle H, Rigo M, Wong M-S, Beygi BH, Wynne J, Timothy Hresko M, Ebermeyer E, Vedreine P, Liu X-C, Thometz JG, Bissonnette B, Sapaly C, Barchi S, Aubin C-É (2022) Biomechanical effects of thoracolumbosacral orthosis design features on 3D correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comprehensive multicenter study. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004353
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004353
pubmed: 35275852