The difference distance between the apical foramen and the anatomical apex in primary teeth-An in vitro study.
anatomical apex
apical foramen
difference distance and primary teeth
Journal
Clinical and experimental dental research
ISSN: 2057-4347
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dent Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
revised:
28
06
2023
received:
06
12
2022
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
13
9
2023
entrez:
13
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The apex area in the primary teeth changes continuously due to the physiologic resorption, therefore; the apical foramen (AF) may not correspond to the anatomic apex (AA), which gives a big challenge to achieve successful endodontic treatment. The aim of this research was to study the difference distance (DD) between the position of the AA and AF, besides the difference acceptance (DA) in primary teeth, and the effect of the following variables: root canal curvature, resorption degree, and canal size on DD and DA separately. In this research, 180 root canals from 60 primary teeth were studied. Two lengths of each canal were measured by a K-file from a certain point in the crown; the first length was until the AA and the second was until the AF. Then DD was obtained by calculating the difference between those two lengths. Statistical analysis tests were done. A p value of <.05 was considered significant at a 95% confidence level. The percentage of canals with 0 mm DD was 34.4%, while it was 1.1% with DD of 6 mm. The percentages of acceptable ( ≤ 2 mm) and unacceptable ( > 2 mm) difference were 84.4% and 15.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the DD value between the three groups of curvature degree and the three groups of canal size. There was a significant difference between the DA in the three groups of canal size. DD has a wide variation value in primary teeth regardless of the degree of root resorption, which has not affected this value or the accepted difference; however, DD and acceptable difference values are somehow affected by the degree of root curvature and canal size. We recommend adding acceptable difference as a criterion when considering pulpectomy treatment in primary teeth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37703170
doi: 10.1002/cre2.784
pmc: PMC10582222
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
913-921Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Apr-Jun;38(2):158-163
pubmed: 32611862
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Sep;71(5):1043-9
pubmed: 23270574
Int Endod J. 2009 Apr;42(4):329-34
pubmed: 19220517
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Oct;20(5):403-408
pubmed: 30603843
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Jan;31(1):143-151
pubmed: 32516507
Microsc Res Tech. 2020 Nov;83(11):1330-1335
pubmed: 32589353
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):481-6
pubmed: 19936530
Int Endod J. 2009 Feb;42(2):115-21
pubmed: 19134039
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:939045
pubmed: 25802894
Int Endod J. 2021 Sep;54(9):1482-1490
pubmed: 33938010
Pediatr Dent. 1983 Mar;5(1):33-7
pubmed: 6574437
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Oct;9(5):913-921
pubmed: 37703170
Int Endod J. 1998 Nov;31(6):394-409
pubmed: 15551607
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Nov 01;9(11):e1292-e1296
pubmed: 29302280
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 May;25(3):199-203
pubmed: 25073636
Int J Oral Sci. 2017 Sep;9(3):151-157
pubmed: 28884743
J Oral Sci. 2007 Mar;49(1):1-12
pubmed: 17429176
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Jan;95(1):94-100
pubmed: 12539034
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;34(4):383-90
pubmed: 27681404
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):34-36
pubmed: 28377652