Forgotten but not gone: A multi-state analysis of modern-day debt imprisonment.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 09 01 2023
accepted: 07 08 2023
medline: 15 9 2023
pubmed: 13 9 2023
entrez: 13 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In almost every state, courts can jail those who fail to pay fines, fees, and other court debts-even those resulting from traffic or other non-criminal violations. While debtors' prisons for private debts have been widely illegal in the United States for more than 150 years, the effect of courts aggressively pursuing unpaid fines and fees is that many Americans are nevertheless jailed for unpaid debts. However, heterogeneous, incomplete, and siloed records have made it difficult to understand the scope of debt imprisonment practices. We culled data from millions of records collected through hundreds of public records requests to county jails to produce a first-of-its-kind dataset documenting imprisonment for court debts in three U.S. states. Using these data, we present novel order-of-magnitude estimates of the prevalence of debt imprisonment, finding that between 2005 and 2018, around 38,000 residents of Texas and around 8,000 residents of Wisconsin were jailed each year for failure to pay (FTP), with the median individual spending one day in jail in both Texas and Wisconsin. Drawing on additional data on FTP warrants from Oklahoma, we also find that unpaid fines and fees leading to debt imprisonment most commonly come from traffic offenses, for which a typical Oklahoma court debtor owes around $250, or $500 if a warrant was issued for their arrest.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37703226
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290397
pii: PONE-D-23-00711
pmc: PMC10499213
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0290397

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Gaebler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Punishm Soc. 2017 Jan;19(1):53-73
pubmed: 29937694
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):736-745
pubmed: 32367028
Science. 2021 Oct 15;374(6565):291-294
pubmed: 34648321

Auteurs

Johann D Gaebler (JD)

Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Phoebe Barghouty (P)

Communication Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Sarah Vicol (S)

Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Cheryl Phillips (C)

Communication Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.

Sharad Goel (S)

Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH