Patient Travel Distance to Neurologist Visits.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 10 2023
31 10 2023
Historique:
received:
19
04
2023
accepted:
10
07
2023
pmc-release:
31
10
2024
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
14
9
2023
entrez:
13
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The density of neurologists within a given geographic region varies greatly across the United States. We aimed to measure patient travel distance and travel time to neurologist visits, across neurologic conditions and subspecialties. Our secondary goal was to identify factors associated with long-distance travel for neurologic care. We performed a cross-sectional analysis using a 2018 Medicare sample of patients with at least 1 outpatient neurologist visit. We identified 563,216 Medicare beneficiaries with a neurologist visit in 2018. Of them, 96,213 (17%) traveled long distance for care. The median driving distance and time were 81.3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 59.9-144.2) miles and 90 (IQR: 69-149) minutes for patients with long-distance travel compared with 13.2 (IQR: 6.5-23) miles and 22 (IQR: 14-33) minutes for patients without long-distance travel. Comparing across neurologic conditions, long-distance travel was most common for nervous system cancer care (39.6%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS] (32.1%), and MS (22.8%). Many factors were associated with long-distance travel, most notably low neurologist density (first quintile: OR 3.04 [95% CI 2.41-3.83] vs fifth quintile), rural setting (4.89 [4.79-4.99]), long-distance travel to primary care physician visit (3.6 [3.51-3.69]), and visits for ALS and nervous system cancer care (3.41 [3.14-3.69] and 5.27 [4.72-5.89], respectively). Nearly one-third of patients bypassed the nearest neurologist by 20+ miles, and 7.3% of patients crossed state lines for neurologist care. We found that nearly 1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries who saw a neurologist traveled ≥50 miles 1-way for care, and travel burden was most common for lower-prevalence neurologic conditions that required coordinated multidisciplinary care. Important potentially addressable predictors of long-distance travel were low neurologist density and rural location, suggesting interventions to improve access to care such as telemedicine or neurologic subspecialist support to local neurologists. Future work should evaluate differences in clinical outcomes between patients with long-distance travel and those without.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The density of neurologists within a given geographic region varies greatly across the United States. We aimed to measure patient travel distance and travel time to neurologist visits, across neurologic conditions and subspecialties. Our secondary goal was to identify factors associated with long-distance travel for neurologic care.
METHODS
We performed a cross-sectional analysis using a 2018 Medicare sample of patients with at least 1 outpatient neurologist visit.
RESULTS
We identified 563,216 Medicare beneficiaries with a neurologist visit in 2018. Of them, 96,213 (17%) traveled long distance for care. The median driving distance and time were 81.3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 59.9-144.2) miles and 90 (IQR: 69-149) minutes for patients with long-distance travel compared with 13.2 (IQR: 6.5-23) miles and 22 (IQR: 14-33) minutes for patients without long-distance travel. Comparing across neurologic conditions, long-distance travel was most common for nervous system cancer care (39.6%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS] (32.1%), and MS (22.8%). Many factors were associated with long-distance travel, most notably low neurologist density (first quintile: OR 3.04 [95% CI 2.41-3.83] vs fifth quintile), rural setting (4.89 [4.79-4.99]), long-distance travel to primary care physician visit (3.6 [3.51-3.69]), and visits for ALS and nervous system cancer care (3.41 [3.14-3.69] and 5.27 [4.72-5.89], respectively). Nearly one-third of patients bypassed the nearest neurologist by 20+ miles, and 7.3% of patients crossed state lines for neurologist care.
DISCUSSION
We found that nearly 1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries who saw a neurologist traveled ≥50 miles 1-way for care, and travel burden was most common for lower-prevalence neurologic conditions that required coordinated multidisciplinary care. Important potentially addressable predictors of long-distance travel were low neurologist density and rural location, suggesting interventions to improve access to care such as telemedicine or neurologic subspecialist support to local neurologists. Future work should evaluate differences in clinical outcomes between patients with long-distance travel and those without.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37704403
pii: WNL.0000000000207810
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207810
pmc: PMC10634641
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1807-e1820Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K23 NS126495
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Mo Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;119(1):74-78
pubmed: 36033136
Gerontology. 2018;64(3):291-299
pubmed: 29444506
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1983-6
pubmed: 26437386
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Sep;24(9):678-683
pubmed: 29271703
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1579-1583
pubmed: 32297055
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015 May;15(5):544
pubmed: 25763758
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Nov;23(11):2285-2293
pubmed: 31152346
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Sep;92(9):1341-1350
pubmed: 28870353
Oncologist. 2015 Dec;20(12):1378-85
pubmed: 26512045
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2029238
pubmed: 33492373
J Glaucoma. 2020 Nov;29(11):1056-1064
pubmed: 32694285
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3177-85
pubmed: 26304878
Cureus. 2020 Oct 18;12(10):e11023
pubmed: 33214951
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jan;10(1):26-31
pubmed: 24443731
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 Jan-Feb;1(1):17-21
pubmed: 16925196
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):1257-1267
pubmed: 35133003
Neurology. 2020 Jan 7;94(1):30-38
pubmed: 31801829
J Rural Health. 2012 Jan;28(1):54-62
pubmed: 22236315
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Feb;29(2):104480
pubmed: 31780246
Health Care Manag Sci. 2022 Mar;25(1):24-41
pubmed: 34564805
Cancer. 2018 Aug 1;124(15):3181-3191
pubmed: 29932220
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 15;94(4):719-28
pubmed: 26972644
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Dec;27(12):1325-1331
pubmed: 33719577
J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-6
pubmed: 16606425
Neurology. 2021 Jan 19;96(3):e309-e321
pubmed: 33361251
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Mar;196(3):410-7
pubmed: 12648693
Health Econ. 2012 Apr;21(4):444-56
pubmed: 21384464
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 20;32(9):942-8
pubmed: 24516014