Application of a practice-based approach in variable selection for a prediction model development study of hospital-induced delirium.
Candidate predictor
Delirium
Expert judgment
Practice-based approach
Prediction model
Variable selection
Journal
BMC medical informatics and decision making
ISSN: 1472-6947
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088682
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 09 2023
13 09 2023
Historique:
received:
08
05
2023
accepted:
30
08
2023
medline:
15
9
2023
pubmed:
14
9
2023
entrez:
13
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium, that include potential predisposing and precipitating factors, may be used to identify vulnerable patients and inform the implementation of tailored preventive interventions. It is recommended that, in prediction model development studies, candidate predictors are selected on the basis of existing knowledge, including knowledge from clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to describe the process of identifying and operationalizing candidate predictors of hospital-induced delirium for application in a prediction model development study using a practice-based approach. This study is part of a larger, retrospective cohort study that is developing prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium for medical-surgical older adult patients using structured data from administrative and electronic health records. First, we conducted a review of the literature to identify clinical concepts that had been used as candidate predictors in prognostic model development-and-validation studies of hospital-induced delirium. Then, we consulted a multidisciplinary task force of nine members who independently judged whether each clinical concept was associated with hospital-induced delirium. Finally, we mapped the clinical concepts to the administrative and electronic health records and operationalized our candidate predictors. In the review of 34 studies, we identified 504 unique clinical concepts. Two-thirds of the clinical concepts (337/504) were used as candidate predictors only once. The most common clinical concepts included age (31/34), sex (29/34), and alcohol use (22/34). 96% of the clinical concepts (484/504) were judged to be associated with the development of hospital-induced delirium by at least two members of the task force. All of the task force members agreed that 47 or 9% of the 504 clinical concepts were associated with hospital-induced delirium. Heterogeneity among candidate predictors of hospital-induced delirium in the literature suggests a still evolving list of factors that contribute to the development of this complex phenomenon. We demonstrated a practice-based approach to variable selection for our model development study of hospital-induced delirium. Expert judgement of variables enabled us to categorize the variables based on the amount of agreement among the experts and plan for the development of different models, including an expert-model and data-driven model.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium, that include potential predisposing and precipitating factors, may be used to identify vulnerable patients and inform the implementation of tailored preventive interventions. It is recommended that, in prediction model development studies, candidate predictors are selected on the basis of existing knowledge, including knowledge from clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to describe the process of identifying and operationalizing candidate predictors of hospital-induced delirium for application in a prediction model development study using a practice-based approach.
METHODS
This study is part of a larger, retrospective cohort study that is developing prognostic models of hospital-induced delirium for medical-surgical older adult patients using structured data from administrative and electronic health records. First, we conducted a review of the literature to identify clinical concepts that had been used as candidate predictors in prognostic model development-and-validation studies of hospital-induced delirium. Then, we consulted a multidisciplinary task force of nine members who independently judged whether each clinical concept was associated with hospital-induced delirium. Finally, we mapped the clinical concepts to the administrative and electronic health records and operationalized our candidate predictors.
RESULTS
In the review of 34 studies, we identified 504 unique clinical concepts. Two-thirds of the clinical concepts (337/504) were used as candidate predictors only once. The most common clinical concepts included age (31/34), sex (29/34), and alcohol use (22/34). 96% of the clinical concepts (484/504) were judged to be associated with the development of hospital-induced delirium by at least two members of the task force. All of the task force members agreed that 47 or 9% of the 504 clinical concepts were associated with hospital-induced delirium.
CONCLUSIONS
Heterogeneity among candidate predictors of hospital-induced delirium in the literature suggests a still evolving list of factors that contribute to the development of this complex phenomenon. We demonstrated a practice-based approach to variable selection for our model development study of hospital-induced delirium. Expert judgement of variables enabled us to categorize the variables based on the amount of agreement among the experts and plan for the development of different models, including an expert-model and data-driven model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37704994
doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02278-1
pii: 10.1186/s12911-023-02278-1
pmc: PMC10500854
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R33 AG062884
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):598-605
pubmed: 31870693
Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):229-36
pubmed: 19118253
JAMA. 1996 Mar 20;275(11):852-7
pubmed: 8596223
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Mar;67(3):652-61
pubmed: 21129007
Ann Surg. 2003 Jul;238(1):149-56
pubmed: 12832977
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jul 11;2(1):1079
pubmed: 25848594
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016 Nov;29(6):320-327
pubmed: 27647793
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Feb 16;8(1):e000262
pubmed: 32148735
Age Ageing. 1996 Jul;25(4):317-21
pubmed: 8831879
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:901-10
pubmed: 23304365
Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22
pubmed: 23992774
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Aug;42(8):809-15
pubmed: 8046190
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 14;168(1):27-32
pubmed: 18195192
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988 Dec;36(12):1099-104
pubmed: 3192888
N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):669-76
pubmed: 10053175
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e127-e135
pubmed: 32302731
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jul;119:103932
pubmed: 33975074
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33
pubmed: 30596876
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):325
pubmed: 32894065
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 14;11(10):e1001744
pubmed: 25314315
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Sep 20;6(1):21
pubmed: 30263902
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 15;119(6):474-81
pubmed: 8357112
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Aug 13-27;167(15):1629-34
pubmed: 17698685
Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):406-11
pubmed: 17721242
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e019223
pubmed: 29705752
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(12):e3072
pubmed: 27015177
Age Ageing. 2014 May;43(3):346-51
pubmed: 24064236
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Aug;38(4):915-23
pubmed: 27177868