Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hugo RAS system: The pioneer experience in Taiwan and Northeast Asia.
human
male
original article
prostate/surgery
prostatectomy/methods
prostatic neoplasms/ surgery
robotic surgical procedures/methods
robotics
Journal
The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS
ISSN: 1478-596X
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Robot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101250764
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2023
13 Sep 2023
Historique:
revised:
23
08
2023
received:
08
07
2023
accepted:
05
09
2023
medline:
14
9
2023
pubmed:
14
9
2023
entrez:
14
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Among the novel robotic platforms, the Hugo RAS system is the second most studied platform, next to the da Vinci system, and we aim to address our experiences in radical prostatectomy (RP) with the Hugo RAS system. We recorded our first 12 cases of prostate cancer undergoing RP with the Hugo RAS system. The median console time was 145 min and median hospital stay was 7 days. Hedge' g was applied to search for the cut-off case in four parameters in surgeries. Pre-console preparation was significantly improved after the first seven cases, and the console time was remarkably shortened after the first two cases. The intraoperative pause for trouble shooting was remarkably shortened after the first three cases. We found that RP with the Hugo RAS system was feasible, and the learning curve was short as surgeons may benefit from the previous experience with the da Vinci system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Among the novel robotic platforms, the Hugo RAS system is the second most studied platform, next to the da Vinci system, and we aim to address our experiences in radical prostatectomy (RP) with the Hugo RAS system.
METHODS
METHODS
We recorded our first 12 cases of prostate cancer undergoing RP with the Hugo RAS system. The median console time was 145 min and median hospital stay was 7 days. Hedge' g was applied to search for the cut-off case in four parameters in surgeries.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Pre-console preparation was significantly improved after the first seven cases, and the console time was remarkably shortened after the first two cases. The intraoperative pause for trouble shooting was remarkably shortened after the first three cases.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found that RP with the Hugo RAS system was feasible, and the learning curve was short as surgeons may benefit from the previous experience with the da Vinci system.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2577Subventions
Organisme : Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital
ID : TTMHH-R1120016
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Bowersox JC, Shah A, Jensen J, Hill J, Cordts PR, Green PS. Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(2):281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70272-0
Bowersox JC, LaPorta AJ, Cordts PR, Bhoyrul S, Shah A. Complex task performance in Cyberspace. Surgical procedures in a telepresence environment. Stud Health Technol Inf. 1996;29:320-326.
Bowersox JC, Cordts PR, LaPorta AJ. Use of an intuitive telemanipulator system for remote trauma surgery: an experimental study. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(6):615-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00105-7
Haidegger T, Sándor J, Benyó Z. Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):681-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1243-3
Boabang F, Glitho R, Elbiaze H, Belqami F, Alfandi O. A framework for predicting haptic feedback in needle insertion in 5-G remote robotic surgery. In: 2020 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE Publications; 2020:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC46108.2020.9045432
Grand View research Inc. Surgical Robots Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Application (Orthopedics, Neurology, Urology, Gynecology), by Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, LATAM, MEA), and Segment Forecasts, 2023-2030. Accessed 15 Jun 2023. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/surgical-robot-market#
Intutive surgical. Annual Report; 2020. Accessed 17 Jun 2023. https://www.annualreports.com/Company/intuitive-surgical-inc
Morelli L, Furbetta N, Bianchini M. Robotic right colectomy with the use of integrated table motion. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;64(1):e7-e8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001877
Yang CH, Chen LH, Lin YS, et al. Incorporating VR-RENDER fusion software in robot-assisted partial prostatectomy: the first case report. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(2):1699-1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020131
Puentes MC, Rojnica M, Sims T, Jones R, Bianco FM, Lobe TE. Senhance robotic platform in pediatrics: early US experience. Children. 2023;10(2):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020178
Samalavicius NE, Janusonis V, Siaulys R, et al. Robotic surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience with first 100 cases. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(2):371-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01000-6
Kulis T, Hudolin T, Penezic L, et al. Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic and extraperitoneal Senhance radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot. 2022;18(1):e2344. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2344
Bravi CA, Paciotti M, Sarchi L, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the novel Hugo robotic system: initial experience and optimal surgical set-up at a tertiary referral robotic center. Eur Urol. 2022;82(2):233-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.029
Mottaran A, Bravi CA, Sarchi L, et al. Robot-assisted Sacropexy with the novel HUGO robot-assisted surgery system: initial experience and surgical setup at a tertiary referral robotic center. J Endourol. 2023;37(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0495
Panico G, Campagna G, Caramazza D, et al. HUGO(TM) RAS System in urogynaecology: the first nerve sparing Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ prolapse. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023;15(1):83-87. https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.1.054
Totaro A, Campetella M, Bientinesi R, et al. The new surgical robotic platform HUGOTM RAS: system description and docking settings for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urologia. 2022;89(4):603-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603221107855
Bianchi PP, Salaj A, Rocco B, Formisano G. First worldwide report on Hugo RAS™ surgical platform in right and left colectomy. Update Surg. 2023;75(3):775-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01489-5
Rocco B, Sighinolfi MC, Sarchi L, et al. First case of robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction with the Hugo RAS system: step-by-step surgical setup and technique. J Robot Surg. 2023. Published online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01629-4
Mottaran A, Paciotti M, Bravi CA, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with the novel HUGO™ RAS System: feasibility, setting, and perioperative outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023;75(2):235-239. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.22.05031-5
Ragavan N, Bharathkumar S, Chirravur P, Sankaran S, Mottrie A. Evaluation of Hugo RAS system in major urologic surgery: our initial experience. J Endourol. 2022;36(8):1029-1035. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0015
Ragavan N, Bharathkumar S, Chirravur P, Sankaran S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy utilizing Hugo RAS platform: initial experience. J Endourol. 2023;37(2):147-150. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0461
Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J, Cheng CL, Patel VR. Learning curve of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with 60 initial cases by a single surgeon. Asian J Surg. 2011;34(2):74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(11)60023-7
Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: prostate cancer, version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2021;19(2):134-143. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008
Ou YC, Yang CK, Chang KS, et al. Prevention and management of complications during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following comprehensive planning: a large series involving a single surgeon. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(4):4895-4902. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11054
PI-RADSTM Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (2015), Version 2 American College of Radiology Website. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/PIRADS/PIRADS%20V2.pdf
Ou YC, Chang KH, Tung MC, et al. Building a nomogram for prediction of prostate cancer in patients with preoperatively suspected prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(5):2995-3002. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14280
Becker F, Morgül H, Katou S, et al. Robotic liver surgery - current standards and future perspectives. Robotische Leberchirurgie - aktuelle Standards und Perspektiven. Z Gastroenterol. 2021;59(1):56-62. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1329-3067
Bogomolova K, Vorstenbosch MATM, El Messaoudi I, et al. Effect of binocular disparity on learning anatomy with stereoscopic augmented reality visualization: a double center randomized controlled trial. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(1):87-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2164
Rassweiler JJ, Autorino R, Klein J, et al. Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2017;120(6):822-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13851
Tung MC, Ou YC, Lu CH, Chang Y, Wen Y. The expansion condition of amount and complexity of urologic robotic surgery in 2000 patients. Formos J Surg. 2020;53(6):223-229. https://doi.org/10.4103/fjs.fjs_101_20