Primary Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for pineal region tumors: A systematic review and pooled analysis of available literature with histological stratification.
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery
pineal tumors
primary treatment
Journal
Journal of pineal research
ISSN: 1600-079X
Titre abrégé: J Pineal Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
06
06
2023
received:
30
03
2023
accepted:
31
08
2023
medline:
10
10
2023
pubmed:
14
9
2023
entrez:
14
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pineal region tumors (PTs) represent extremely rare pathologies, characterized by highly heterogeneous histological patterns. Most of the available evidence for Gamma Knife radiosurgical (GKSR) treatment of PTs arises from multimodal regimens, including GKSR as an adjuvant modality or as a salvage treatment at recurrence. We aimed to gather existing evidence on the topic and analyze single-patient-level data to address the efficacy and safety of primary GKSR. This is a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Science Direct) and pooled analysis of single-patient-level data. A total of 1054 original works were retrieved. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant works, we included 13 papers (n = 64 patients). An additional 12 patients were included from the authors' original series. A total of 76 patients reached the final analysis; 56.5% (n = 43) received a histological diagnosis. Confirmed lesions included pineocytoma WHO grade I (60.5%), pineocytoma WHO grade II (14%), pineoblastoma WHO IV (7%), pineal tumor with intermediate differentiation WHO II/III (4.7%), papillary tumor of pineal region WHO II/III (4.7%), germ cell tumor (2.3%), neurocytoma WHO I (2.3%), astrocytoma WHO II (2.3%) and WHO III (2.3%). Presumptive diagnoses were achieved in the remaining 43.5% (n = 33) of cases and comprised of pineocytoma (9%), germ cell tumor (6%), low-grade glioma (6%), high-grade glioma (3%), meningioma (3%) and undefined in 73%. The mean age at the time of GKSR was 38.7 years and the mean lesional volume was 4.2 ± 4 cc. All patients received GKSR with a mean marginal dose of 14.7 ± 2.1 Gy (50% isodose). At a median 36-month follow-up, local control was achieved in 80.3% of cases. Thirteen patients showed progression after a median time of 14 months. Overall mortality was 13.2%. The median OS was not reached for all included lesions, except high-grade gliomas (8mo). The 3-year OS was 100% for LGG and pineal tumors with intermediate differentiation, 91% for low-grade pineal lesions, 66% for high-grade pineal lesions, 60% for germ cell tumors (GCTs), 50% for HGG, and 82% for undetermined tumors. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 100% for LGG and pineal intermediate tumors, 86% for low-grade pineal, 66% for high-grade pineal, 33.3% for GCTs, and 0% for HGG. Median PFS was 5 months for HGG and 34 months for GCTs. The radionecrosis rate was 6%, and cystic degeneration was observed in 2%. Ataxia as a presenting symptom strongly predicted mortality (odds ratio [OR] 104, p = .02), while GCTs and HGG histology well predicted PD (OR: 13, p = .04). These results support the efficacy and safety of primary GKSR treatment of PTs. Further studies are needed to validate these results, which highlight the importance of the initial presumptive diagnosis for choosing the best therapeutic strategy.
Substances chimiques
Melatonin
JL5DK93RCL
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e12910Informations de copyright
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Dahiya S, Perry A. Pineal tumors. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010;17(6):419-427.
Fèvre-Montange M, Vasiljevic A, Champier J, Jouvet A. Histopathology of tumors of the pineal region. Future Oncol. 2010;6(5):791-809.
Han SJ, Clark AJ, Ivan ME, Parsa AT, Perry A. Pathology of pineal parenchymal tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011;22(3):335-340.
Hirato J, Nakazato Y. Pathology of pineal region tumors. JNO. 2001;54(3):239-249.
Oi S, Matsumoto S. Controversy pertaining to therapeutic modalities for tumors of the pineal region: a worldwide survey of different patient populations. Childs Nerv Syst. 1992;8(6):332-336.
Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI. Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol. 2003;59(4):252-270.
Mottolese C, Beuriat PA, Szathmari A. Pineal tumours: experience of the French national register and the lyon school, results and considerations. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(2-3):223-235.
Azab W, Nasim K, Salaheddin W. An overview of the current surgical options for pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:39.
Bruce JN, Ogden AT. Surgical strategies for treating patients with pineal region tumors. JNO. 2004;69(1-3):221-236.
Fedorko S, Zweckberger K, Unterberg AW. Quality of life following surgical treatment of lesions within the pineal region. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(1):28-37.
Hanft SJ, Isaacson SR, Bruce JN. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pineal region tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011;22(3):413-420.
Tamaki N, Yin D. Therapeutic strategies and surgical results for pineal region tumours. J Clin Neurosci. 2000;7(2):125-128.
Balossier A, Blond S, Touzet G, Sarrazin T, Lartigau E, Reyns N. Role of radiosurgery in the management of pineal region tumours: indications, method, outcome. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(2-3):216-222.
Deshmukh VR, Smith KA, Rekate HL, Coons S, Spetzler RF. Diagnosis and management of pineocytomas. Neurosurgery. 2004;55(2):349-357.
Fernández-Mateos C, Martinez R, Vaquero J. Long-Term Follow-Up after radiosurgery of papillary tumor of pineal region: 2 case reports and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:190-193.
Hasegawa T, Kondziolka D, Hadjipanayis CG, et al. The role of radiosurgery for the treatment of pineal parenchymal tumors. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(4):880-889.
Hasegawa T, Kondziolka D, Hadjipanayis CG, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery for CNS nongerminomatous germ cell tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003;38(6):329-333.
Lekovic GP, Gonzalez LF, Shetter AG, et al. Role of gamma knife surgery in the management of pineal region tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(6):E11.
Li D, Wen R, Gao Y, et al. Pineal region gliomas: A Single-Center experience with 25 cases. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e6-e17.
Mori Y, Kobayashi T, Hasegawa T, Yoshida K, Kida Y. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pineal and related tumors. Prog Neurol Surg. 2009;23:106-118.
Park JH, Kim JH, Kwon DH, Kim CJ, Khang SK, Cho YH. Upfront stereotactic radiosurgery for pineal parenchymal tumors in adults. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(4):334-340.
Reyns N, Hayashi M, Chinot O, et al. The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of pineal parenchymal tumours. Acta Neurochir. 2006;148(1):5-11.
Wang P, Mao Q, Wang W, Zhou LX, Liu YH. Gamma knife surgery for pineal region tumors: an alternative strategy for negative pathology. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72(2):129-135.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Quality assessment tool for case series studies. Accessed 26 January, 2023. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-Oncology. 2021;23(8):1231-1251.
Kobayashi T, Kida Y, Mori Y. Stereotactic gamma radiosurgery for pineal and related tumors. JNO. 2001;54(3):301-309.
Li W, Zhang B, Kang W, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for pineal region tumors: a study of 147 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:304.
Yang QY, Guo CC, Deng ML, et al. Treatment of primary intracranial germ cell tumors: single center experience with 42 clinically diagnosed cases. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):60665-60675.
Mottolese C, Szathmari A, Beuriat PA. Incidence of pineal tumours. A review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(2-3):65-69.
Lombardi G, Poliani PL, Manara R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pineal region tumors in adults: a EURACAN overview. Cancers. 2022;14(15):3646.