Extended trajectory of spatial memory errors in typical and atypical development: The role of binding and precision.
down syndrome
hippocampus
memory development
precision
relational memory
Journal
Hippocampus
ISSN: 1098-1063
Titre abrégé: Hippocampus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9108167
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
revised:
06
08
2023
received:
01
08
2022
accepted:
23
08
2023
pmc-release:
01
11
2024
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
14
9
2023
entrez:
14
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Spatial reconstruction, a method for evaluating how individuals remember the placement of objects, has traditionally been evaluated through the aggregate estimation of placement errors. However, this approach may obscure the nature of task errors. Specifically, recent data has suggested the importance of examining the precision of responses, as well as absolute performance on item-context bindings. In contrast to traditional analysis approaches based on the distance between the target and the reconstructed item, in this study we further explored three types of errors (swap error, global error, and local distance) that may all contribute to the distance, with particular emphasis on swap errors and local distance due to their associations with item-context bindings and memory precision, respectively. We examined these errors in children aged 3-18 years, making comparisons between children with typical development (TD) and children with Down syndrome (DS), a population with known memory challenges. As expected, older children outperformed younger children in terms of overall memory accuracy. Of importance is that we measured uneven maturational trajectories of memory abilities across the various error types. Specifically, both remembered locations (irrespective of object identity) and swap errors (object-location binding errors) align with the overall memory accuracy. Memory precision, as measured by local distance in simpler set size 2 trials, mirrored overall memory accuracy. However, for more complex set size 3 trials, local distance remained stable before age 8 and showed age-related change thereafter. The group with DS showed reduced precision compared to a TD matched group, and measures of precision, and to a lesser extent binding errors, correlated with standard neuropsychological outcomes. Overall, our study contributed to a fine-grained understanding of developing spatial memory ability in a large sample of typical developing children and a memory impaired population. These findings contribute to a growing body of research examining precision as a key factor in memory performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37706613
doi: 10.1002/hipo.23576
pmc: PMC10638674
mid: NIHMS1939365
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1171-1188Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P50 HD103526
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD088409
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01HD088409
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P50HD103526
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Funct Neurol. 2013 Jan-Mar;28(1):19-28
pubmed: 23731912
Child Dev. 2003 Jan-Feb;74(1):75-93
pubmed: 12625437
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 2;115(40):10148-10153
pubmed: 30224452
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 8;80:90-101
pubmed: 26593960
Hippocampus. 2022 Aug;32(8):597-609
pubmed: 35736516
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jan;2(1):51-61
pubmed: 11253359
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Sep;148(9):1463-1479
pubmed: 30896199
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 May;4(3):307-317
pubmed: 26304208
Hippocampus. 2020 Mar;30(3):210-219
pubmed: 31369174
J Neurodev Disord. 2018 Jan 29;10(1):5
pubmed: 29378508
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Aug;22(8):676-686
pubmed: 29934029
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Feb;41:100741
pubmed: 31826840
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2011 Jul-Aug;45(4):363-9
pubmed: 22101997
Hippocampus. 2018 Feb;28(2):164-177
pubmed: 29232494
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46970
pubmed: 23056545
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2163-72
pubmed: 24058066
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Oct 1;254:34-44
pubmed: 23721964
Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):252-8
pubmed: 11296689
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57
pubmed: 11293691
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107341
pubmed: 31945386
Neuroimage. 2013 Jul 1;74:276-87
pubmed: 23485848
Genes Brain Behav. 2003 Jun;2(3):156-66
pubmed: 12931789
Brain Commun. 2021 Apr 19;3(2):fcab088
pubmed: 33977271
Hippocampus. 2020 Oct;30(10):1098-1111
pubmed: 32497411
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 24;41(8):1738-1754
pubmed: 33443075
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):182-201
pubmed: 27585371
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;12:669320
pubmed: 34122185
Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Oct 29;2:15
pubmed: 18989388
Curr Biol. 2012 Sep 25;22(18):1693-8
pubmed: 22902750
Memory. 2013;21(8):945-68
pubmed: 23485108
Cogn Dev. 2019 Oct-Dec;52:
pubmed: 32863569
Hippocampus. 2013 Jul;23(7):570-80
pubmed: 23418096
Hippocampus. 2001;11(1):61-71
pubmed: 11261774
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Feb 1;27(2):888-902
pubmed: 28057726
Neurology. 2001 Apr 10;56(7):972-4
pubmed: 11294940
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1008-16
pubmed: 20878909
Child Dev. 2016 Jan-Feb;87(1):194-210
pubmed: 26493950
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Jun;31(6):872-8
pubmed: 20496378
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Jun;32(5):405-17
pubmed: 21522020
Neuroimage. 2013 Mar;68:63-74
pubmed: 23246860
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Jan;117:22-33
pubmed: 24752152
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 1;94:162-171
pubmed: 24642282
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Sep;32(7):548-58
pubmed: 21743353
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 16;6:62
pubmed: 25762946
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jul;23(7):788-799
pubmed: 32601411