Within-herd transmission of Mycoplasma bovis infections after initial detection in dairy cows.

Mycoplasma bovis Susceptible-Infected-Removed/Recovered (SIR) models dairy farms infection dynamics transmission

Journal

Journal of dairy science
ISSN: 1525-3198
Titre abrégé: J Dairy Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985126R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 21 02 2023
accepted: 21 08 2023
medline: 15 9 2023
pubmed: 15 9 2023
entrez: 14 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Mycoplasma bovis outbreaks in cattle, including pathogen spread between age groups, are not well understood. Our objective was to estimate within-herd transmission across adult dairy cows, youngstock and calves. Results from 3 tests (PCR, ELISA, and culture) per cow and 2 tests (PCR and ELISA) per youngstock and calf were utilized in an age-stratified Susceptible-Infected-Removed/Recovered (SIR) model to estimate within-herd transmission parameters, pathways, and potential effects of farm management practices. A cohort of adult cows, youngstock and calves on 20 Dutch dairy farms with a clinical outbreak of M. bovis in adult cows were sampled, with collection of blood, conjunctival fluid and milk from cows, and blood and conjunctival fluid from calves and youngstock, 5 times over a timespan of 12 wk. Any individual with at least 1 positive laboratory test was considered M. bovis-positive. Transmission dynamics were modeled using an age-stratified SIR model featuring 3 age strata. Associations with farm management practices were explored using Fisher's Exact tests and Poisson regression. Estimated transmission parameters were highly variable among herds and cattle-age groups. Notably, transmission from cows to cows, youngstock, or to calves was associated with R-values ranging from 1.0 to 80 secondarily infected cows per herd, 1.2 to 38 secondarily infected youngstock per herd, and 0.1 to 91 secondarily infected calves per herd, respectively. In case of transmission from youngstock to youngstock, calves or to cows, R-values were 0.7 to 96 secondarily infected youngstock per herd, 1.1 to 76 secondarily infected calves per herd, and 0.1 to 107 secondarily infected cows per herd. For transmission from calves to calves, youngstock or to cows, R-values were 0.5 to 60 secondarily infected calves per herd, 1.1 to 41 secondarily infected youngstock per herd, and 0.1 to 47 secondarily infected cows per herd. Among on-farm transmission pathways, cow-to-youngstock, cow-to-calf and cow-to-cow were identified as most significant contributors, with calf-to-calf and calf-to-youngstock also having noteworthy roles. Youngstock-to-youngstock was also implicated, albeit to a lesser extent. Whereas the primary focus was a clinical outbreak of M. bovis among adult dairy cows, it was evident that transmission extended to calves and youngstock, contributing to overall spread. Factors influencing transmission and specific transmission pathways were associated with internal biosecurity (separate caretakers for various age groups, number of people involved), external biosecurity (contractors, external employees), as well as indirect transmission routes (number of feed and water stations).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37709017
pii: S0022-0302(23)00648-3
doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23407
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Auteurs

Marit M Biesheuvel (MM)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Electronic address: marit.biesheuvel@ucalgary.ca.

Caitlin Ward (C)

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Patty Penterman (P)

Royal GD, Deventer, The Netherlands.

Erik van Engelen (E)

Royal GD, Deventer, The Netherlands.

Gerdien van Schaik (G)

Royal GD, Deventer, The Netherlands; Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Rob Deardon (R)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Herman W Barkema (HW)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Classifications MeSH