Anesthesia practices for management of labor pain and cesarean delivery in France (EPIDOL): A cross-sectional survey.
Cesarean delivery
Epidural
Labor
Obstetric anesthesia
Pain
Journal
Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine
ISSN: 2352-5568
Titre abrégé: Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101652401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Sep 2023
12 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
20
04
2023
revised:
25
08
2023
accepted:
26
08
2023
pubmed:
15
9
2023
medline:
15
9
2023
entrez:
14
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aimed to collect obstetric anesthesia practice and patient-reported outcomes as an update to the last French Obstetric Anesthesia survey from 1996. Maternity units were randomly selected across France and surveyed for 7 consecutive days from February, 2016, to January, 2017. Data was gathered prospectively by questionnaires filled out by patients and anesthesia providers. There were 1885 questionnaires received from 56 units, with 379 cesarean delivery (CD) and 1506 vaginal delivery (VD) cases analyzed. The overall neuraxial labor analgesia (NLA) rate was 82.5% (95% CI [82.4-82.6]), with 70.3% (95% CI [71.4-71.6]) receiving automated administration (PCEA/PIEB). NLA was effective throughout labor in 68.2% of cases, however, severe pain was reported by 29.4% of patients. The overall rate of alternative approaches for labor analgesia was 19.5% (95%CI [19.2-19.7]). Obesity (OR 2.8; 95% CI [1.0-7.5], p < 0.04) and delivery in level I units (OR 0.6; 95% CI [0.5-0.9], p < 0.01) were associated with severe pain during VD. Satisfaction was found to be similar in patients delivering with or without NLA. The incidence of pain during CD was similar in scheduled versus non-scheduled CD. Failure of NLA during CD was associated with severe pain (OR 10.0; 95% CI [3.1-31.9], p < 0.01) and dissatisfaction (OR 26.2; 95% CI [3.0-225.1], p < 0.01). Despite the high NLA rate in France, a significant proportion of women experience severe pain during labor and delivery. This study emphasizes the need for further practice guidelines in obstetric anesthesia to ensure optimal pain management and improve patients' experience during childbirth. govNCT02853890.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to collect obstetric anesthesia practice and patient-reported outcomes as an update to the last French Obstetric Anesthesia survey from 1996.
METHODS
METHODS
Maternity units were randomly selected across France and surveyed for 7 consecutive days from February, 2016, to January, 2017. Data was gathered prospectively by questionnaires filled out by patients and anesthesia providers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 1885 questionnaires received from 56 units, with 379 cesarean delivery (CD) and 1506 vaginal delivery (VD) cases analyzed. The overall neuraxial labor analgesia (NLA) rate was 82.5% (95% CI [82.4-82.6]), with 70.3% (95% CI [71.4-71.6]) receiving automated administration (PCEA/PIEB). NLA was effective throughout labor in 68.2% of cases, however, severe pain was reported by 29.4% of patients. The overall rate of alternative approaches for labor analgesia was 19.5% (95%CI [19.2-19.7]). Obesity (OR 2.8; 95% CI [1.0-7.5], p < 0.04) and delivery in level I units (OR 0.6; 95% CI [0.5-0.9], p < 0.01) were associated with severe pain during VD. Satisfaction was found to be similar in patients delivering with or without NLA. The incidence of pain during CD was similar in scheduled versus non-scheduled CD. Failure of NLA during CD was associated with severe pain (OR 10.0; 95% CI [3.1-31.9], p < 0.01) and dissatisfaction (OR 26.2; 95% CI [3.0-225.1], p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the high NLA rate in France, a significant proportion of women experience severe pain during labor and delivery. This study emphasizes the need for further practice guidelines in obstetric anesthesia to ensure optimal pain management and improve patients' experience during childbirth.
CLINICALTRIALS
RESULTS
govNCT02853890.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37709198
pii: S2352-5568(23)00110-8
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101302
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02853890']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101302Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.