Dermatology Life Quality Index in Thai Patients with Facial Port-Wine Stains.

DLQI Port-wine stain Quality of life Subjective evaluation

Journal

Dermatology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8210
Titre abrégé: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101590450

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 23 05 2023
accepted: 10 08 2023
medline: 15 9 2023
pubmed: 15 9 2023
entrez: 14 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Port-wine stains (PWS) are congenital capillary abnormalities caused by immature, venule-like vasculature that progressively dilates due to poor endothelial cell differentiation. PWS affects between 0.3% and 0.9% of newborns, with 90% of cases occurring on the face. Individuals with facial PWS and their parents had a significant negative impairment on their quality of life (QoL) and also suffered from psychological disabilities. This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey study in Thailand from July 2021 to April 2022. The questionnaires included demographic data, subjective evaluation (SE), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The questionnaire was performed with a full scale and adjusted scale of validity and reliability test of DLQI using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. The study outcome was a subjective evaluation and DLQI in patients who received pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment. Of the 54 patients, 35.2% (19) are male, and 64.8% (35) are female. Regarding age groups, 64.8% (35) are below 5 years old, and 35.2% (19) are older than 5 years. SE results showed that males evaluated an improvement of the facial PWS lesion significantly better than females (P < 0.05). The older age group graded the percentage of improvement better than the younger age group (P < 0.01). The result of the DLQI showed no difference in DLQI between gender. Older age result resulted in a significantly different DLQI compared with younger age (P < 0.01). Parent-reported DLQI improvement was less than self-reported DLQI improvement in patients with PWS treated with PDL (P < 0.05). Concerning the instrument of the study, the validity and reliability analysis of the DLQI questionnaire using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha have been performed. The adjusted scale with the 5-item DLQI questionnaire is more appropriate in terms validity and reliability. This study demonstrates that facial PWS reduces the QoL as measured by DLQI. We discovered that the QoL of patients and parents with PWS was significantly impaired. The main influencing factors were older age, the improved perception between gender, and PDL treatments. In addition, we found only five questions that are reliable for PWS. The adjusted five-item DLQI questionnaires are more appropriate regarding validity and reliability. TCTR20230210001, COA no. si 1059/2020.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37710079
doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01011-0
pii: 10.1007/s13555-023-01011-0
pmc: PMC10539252
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2375-2386

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Apr;42(4):667-71
pubmed: 10727315
Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(2):182-9
pubmed: 11241528
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018 Apr;20(2):77-84
pubmed: 29384394
Value Health. 2021 Aug;24(8):1158-1171
pubmed: 34372982
Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):889-96
pubmed: 3377518
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Apr;11(2):465-473
pubmed: 33481216
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;16(2):147-58
pubmed: 25152654
J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Mar;38(2):162-72
pubmed: 23172874
J Pediatr Psychol. 1997 Aug;22(4):471-85
pubmed: 9302845
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Mar 20;4(1):20
pubmed: 32193721
Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Nov;26(6):845-59
pubmed: 21390514
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Dec;67(6):1214-9
pubmed: 22749320
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 07;20(9):
pubmed: 31067686
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Jul;20(7):2203-2210
pubmed: 33949094
Br J Dermatol. 1989 Aug;121(2):209-15
pubmed: 2775645
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Aug 16;101(8):adv00516
pubmed: 34263327
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994 May;19(3):210-6
pubmed: 8033378
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jun 22;14:681-690
pubmed: 34188511
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jul;57(1):20-4
pubmed: 16799303
Dermatology. 2021;237(3):416-432
pubmed: 33271556
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Sep 22;14:635-642
pubmed: 36171909
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Apr;76(4):695-702
pubmed: 27955934
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Apr 22;:
pubmed: 32320629
Health Econ. 2016 Jun;25(6):768-77
pubmed: 25926161
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(51):e9446
pubmed: 29390578
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Apr;33(4):725-734
pubmed: 30383905
Pediatr Dermatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;28(4):375-9
pubmed: 21736605
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Dec;177(6):1601-1611
pubmed: 28599054
Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Sep;50(6):463-7
pubmed: 9326151
Pediatr Dermatol. 2017 May;34(3):295-302
pubmed: 28382698

Auteurs

Tatre Jantarakolica (T)

Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha (R)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-Nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. rungsima.wan@mahidol.ac.th.
College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand. rungsima.wan@mahidol.ac.th.

Chadakan Yan (C)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-Nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Yuri Yogya (Y)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-Nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Woraphong Manuskiatti (W)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Pran-Nok Road, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Tatchalerm Sudhipongpracha (T)

College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH