Basic life support training for people with disabilities. A scoping review.
Basic life support
Bystander
Disability
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Training
Journal
Resuscitation plus
ISSN: 2666-5204
Titre abrégé: Resusc Plus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101774410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
15
9
2023
pubmed:
15
9
2023
entrez:
15
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The integration of populations with various types of disabilities into basic life support (BLS) training programs could contribute to a potential increase in trained laypersons with BLS knowledge and, consequently, in survival rates. The objective of this study was to analyze the distinct educational methods which exist today on BLS for people with some type of specific disability, and to evaluate their impact on the quality of BLS maneuvers. A scoping review in which the different training strategies in BLS for people with distinctive disabilities were analyzed was carried out. Previous studies were sought and researched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from the beginning up to 4 August 2023. A total of 14 studies were thoroughly analyzed. The BLS training strategies for people with disabilities were classified according to the following criteria: objective (training, content validation or analysis of learning barriers), target population (visual, hearing, physical disabilities or Down syndrome), training resources (training with/without adaptation), contents (BLS and use of the automated external defibrillator) and evaluation instrument (i.e., the simulation test and knowledge questionnaire). The variety of BLS training programs for such population is limited. Likewise, people with different disabilities are able to effectively learn BLS maneuvers, although with mixed results, mainly in those regarding the CPR quality. People with visual, hearing disabilities or Down syndrome are able to effectively learn BLS maneuvers.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The integration of populations with various types of disabilities into basic life support (BLS) training programs could contribute to a potential increase in trained laypersons with BLS knowledge and, consequently, in survival rates. The objective of this study was to analyze the distinct educational methods which exist today on BLS for people with some type of specific disability, and to evaluate their impact on the quality of BLS maneuvers.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A scoping review in which the different training strategies in BLS for people with distinctive disabilities were analyzed was carried out. Previous studies were sought and researched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from the beginning up to 4 August 2023.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 14 studies were thoroughly analyzed. The BLS training strategies for people with disabilities were classified according to the following criteria: objective (training, content validation or analysis of learning barriers), target population (visual, hearing, physical disabilities or Down syndrome), training resources (training with/without adaptation), contents (BLS and use of the automated external defibrillator) and evaluation instrument (i.e., the simulation test and knowledge questionnaire). The variety of BLS training programs for such population is limited. Likewise, people with different disabilities are able to effectively learn BLS maneuvers, although with mixed results, mainly in those regarding the CPR quality.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
People with visual, hearing disabilities or Down syndrome are able to effectively learn BLS maneuvers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37711683
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100467
pii: S2666-5204(23)00110-8
pmc: PMC10497786
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100467Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Occup Health Nurs. 1978 Mar;26(3):17-9
pubmed: 146834
Am Ann Deaf. 1983 Dec;128(7):909-12
pubmed: 6198892
Resuscitation. 2004 Oct;63(1):43-8
pubmed: 15451585
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 May 22;57:e20220227
pubmed: 37216652
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108
pubmed: 19490148
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_1):S222-S283
pubmed: 33084395
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Jun 08;28:e3283
pubmed: 32520239
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:388-407
pubmed: 33773831
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):
pubmed: 34682471
Resuscitation. 2020 Nov;156:A188-A239
pubmed: 33098918
Resuscitation. 2019 Feb;135:153-161
pubmed: 30391370
Resuscitation. 2017 Aug;117:e23-e24
pubmed: 28634049
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126
pubmed: 33038124
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:288-301
pubmed: 26477418
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Jul;58(7):625-36
pubmed: 23796135
Aten Primaria. 2004 Nov 15;34(8):408-13
pubmed: 15546538
Resusc Plus. 2023 Aug 04;15:100440
pubmed: 37560757
Resuscitation. 2017 Apr;113:e5-e6
pubmed: 28130093
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Mar 10;27:e3130
pubmed: 30916231
Circulation. 2022 Dec 20;146(25):e483-e557
pubmed: 36325905
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:1-60
pubmed: 33773824
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;56:196-204
pubmed: 35427855
Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:119-22
pubmed: 25637696
Resuscitation. 2019 Jan;134:165-166
pubmed: 30496839
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:201-214
pubmed: 29128145