Calibration phantom-based prediction of CT lung nodule volume measurement performance.
Computed tomography image quality (CT image quality)
calibration
lung nodule
quantitative imaging
Journal
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2023
01 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
04
04
2022
accepted:
22
05
2023
medline:
15
9
2023
pubmed:
15
9
2023
entrez:
15
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A calibration phantom-based method has been developed for predicting small lung nodule volume measurement bias and precision that is specific to a particular computed tomography (CT) scanner and acquisition protocol. The approach involves CT scanning a simple reference object with a specific acquisition protocol, analyzing the scan to estimate the fundamental imaging properties of the CT acquisition system, generating numerous simulated images of a target geometry using the fundamental imaging properties, measuring the simulated images with a standard nodule volume segmentation algorithm, and calculating bias and precision performance statistics from the resulting volume measurements. We evaluated the ability of this approach to predict volume measurement bias and precision of Teflon spheres (diameters =4.76, 6.36, and 7.94 mm) placed within an anthropomorphic chest phantom when using 3M Scotch Magic™ tape as the reference object. CT scanning of the spheres was performed with 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 mm slice thickness and spacing. The study demonstrated good agreement between predicted volumetric performance and observed volume measurement performance for both volumetric measurement bias and precision. The predicted and observed volume mean for all slice thicknesses was found to be 28% and 13% lower on average than the manufactured sphere volume, respectively. When restricted to 0.625 and 1.25 mm slice thickness scans, which are recommended for small lung nodule volume measurement, we found that the difference between predicted and observed volume coefficient of variation was less than 1.0 %. The approach also showed a resilience to varying CT image acquisition protocols, a critical capability when deploying in a real-world clinical setting. This is the first report of a calibration phantom-based method's ability to predict both small lung nodule volume measurement bias and precision. Volume measurement bias and precision for small lung nodules can be predicted using simple low-cost reference objects to estimate fundamental CT image characteristics and modeling and simulation techniques. The approach demonstrates an improved method for predicting task specific, clinically relevant measurement performance using advanced and fully automated image analysis techniques and low-cost reference objects.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
A calibration phantom-based method has been developed for predicting small lung nodule volume measurement bias and precision that is specific to a particular computed tomography (CT) scanner and acquisition protocol.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The approach involves CT scanning a simple reference object with a specific acquisition protocol, analyzing the scan to estimate the fundamental imaging properties of the CT acquisition system, generating numerous simulated images of a target geometry using the fundamental imaging properties, measuring the simulated images with a standard nodule volume segmentation algorithm, and calculating bias and precision performance statistics from the resulting volume measurements. We evaluated the ability of this approach to predict volume measurement bias and precision of Teflon spheres (diameters =4.76, 6.36, and 7.94 mm) placed within an anthropomorphic chest phantom when using 3M Scotch Magic™ tape as the reference object. CT scanning of the spheres was performed with 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 mm slice thickness and spacing.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The study demonstrated good agreement between predicted volumetric performance and observed volume measurement performance for both volumetric measurement bias and precision. The predicted and observed volume mean for all slice thicknesses was found to be 28% and 13% lower on average than the manufactured sphere volume, respectively. When restricted to 0.625 and 1.25 mm slice thickness scans, which are recommended for small lung nodule volume measurement, we found that the difference between predicted and observed volume coefficient of variation was less than 1.0 %. The approach also showed a resilience to varying CT image acquisition protocols, a critical capability when deploying in a real-world clinical setting.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
This is the first report of a calibration phantom-based method's ability to predict both small lung nodule volume measurement bias and precision. Volume measurement bias and precision for small lung nodules can be predicted using simple low-cost reference objects to estimate fundamental CT image characteristics and modeling and simulation techniques. The approach demonstrates an improved method for predicting task specific, clinically relevant measurement performance using advanced and fully automated image analysis techniques and low-cost reference objects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37711774
doi: 10.21037/qims-22-320
pii: qims-13-09-6193
pmc: PMC10498266
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
6193-6204Informations de copyright
2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-22-320/coif). Ricardo Avila is the CEO and owns stock in Accumetra. Accumetra also holds and submits patents in the area of CT image quality. He is also the owner of Paraxial, LLC which develops imaging software and other technologies. Ricardo Avila’s wife (Lisa Avila) is the CEO of Kitware which also develops imaging software and other technologies. Karthik Krishnan is an independent consultant of Accumetra, LLC. NO collaborates with QIBA as a statistical consultant through a contract between her institution and RSNA. AJ received a 2-year $100k grant from the Prevent Cancer Foundation for a project to model factors influencing nodule measurement uncertainty. The grant was paid to my institution and ended in Jan 2021. This is not directly related to this manuscript other than the overarching theme of trying to make better measurements. DY is a named inventor on a number of patents and patent applications related to the evaluation of chest diseases including measurements of chest nodules. He has received financial compensation for the licensing of these patents. In addition, he is a consultant and co-owner of Accumetra, a private company developing tools to improve the quality of CT imaging. He is on the advisory board and owns equity in HeartLung, a company that develops software related to CT scans of the chest. He is on the medical advisory board of Median Technology that is developing technology related to analyzing pulmonary nodules and is on the medical advisory board of Carestream, a company that develops radiography equipment and has consulted for Genentech, AstraZeneca and Pfizer. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Cancer Imaging. 2016 Mar 16;16:5
pubmed: 26984681
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Apr;17(4):560-562
pubmed: 31837979
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Apr;25(4):435-50
pubmed: 16608059
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Feb 20;8:13
pubmed: 24600387
J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Dec;35(4):213-25; quiz 226-8
pubmed: 18006597
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1577-83
pubmed: 23727376
Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):400-8
pubmed: 18430874
Tomography. 2018 Mar;4(1):33-41
pubmed: 29984312
Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1979-84
pubmed: 17206420
Radiology. 2015 Nov;277(2):555-64
pubmed: 26101879
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):725-34
pubmed: 25686365
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):306-12
pubmed: 17242235
Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):2089-97
pubmed: 19610298
Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1180-7
pubmed: 19921204
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr;12(4):390-5
pubmed: 25842017
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Apr 16;11(2):3037
pubmed: 20592693
Radiol Phys Technol. 2012 Jul;5(2):166-71
pubmed: 22447104