Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and its association with outcome: A surrogate marker of survival.
Chemotherapy response score
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Ovarian cancer
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
22
06
2023
revised:
31
08
2023
accepted:
06
09
2023
pubmed:
17
9
2023
medline:
17
9
2023
entrez:
16
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to validate whether pathologic response (pR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) using a three-tier chemotherapy response score (CRS) is associated with clinical outcome in ovarian cancer (OC) and could be used as surrogate marker for survival. We conducted a retrospective study of OC patients with FIGO stage III/IV disease who received NACT and graded response as no or minimal (CRS 1), partial (CRS 2), or complete/near-complete (CRS 3) pR using tissue specimens obtained from omentum. Uni- and multivariate survival analyses were performed accounting for age, FIGO stage, debulking and BRCA status as well as neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab. CRSs 1, 2 and 3 were found in 41(31%), 62 (47%) and 30 (22%) of the 133 examined cases. Response to NACT was associated with significantly improved progression-free (PFS, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.011). Complete/ near-complete pathologic response (CRS3) was associated with improved PFS (median 24.8 vs. 12.5 months, unadjusted HR 0.28 [95%CI 0.15-0.54], p < 0.001; adjusted hazard ration (aHR) 0.31 [95% CI 0.14-0.72], p = 0.007) and OS (median 63.3 vs. 32.1 months, unadjusted HR 0.27 [95%CI 0.10-0.68], p = 0.006; aHR 0.32 [95% CI 0.09-1.11], p = 0.072) when compared to no or minimal response (CRS1). We validate a three-tier CRS for assessment of pathologic response to NACT in OC and demonstrate its prognostic independence of BRCA status or neoadjuvant bevacizumab use. Improving pR rates may be a useful goal of NACT in OC with the expectation of improved survival. The CRS may be a useful endpoint in clinical trials in OC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37716223
pii: S0090-8258(23)01464-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.002
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173-179Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Salani reports consulting fees with Merck, Seagen, GSK, Eisai, Regeneron and Immunogen. She has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers, bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from UpToDate and Elsevier. Additionally, she serves as IGCS treasurer elect. Dr. Chase is a consultant and speaker for Astra Zeneca, GSK, Immunogen, Seagen/Genmab and Eisai. She also participates in the Data Safety Monitoring Board for NRG. Dr. Konecny reports the following: Speaker Bureau: GSK, Immunogen, Merck and AZ; research support to the institution: Lilly and Merck; Advisory boards: Mersana, Immunogen, GSK.