Mesh versus suture repair of incisional hernias 2 cm or less: Is mesh necessary? A propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.
Journal
Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Sep 2023
14 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
01
05
2023
revised:
13
07
2023
accepted:
08
08
2023
medline:
17
9
2023
pubmed:
17
9
2023
entrez:
16
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Mesh has been the acceptable standard for incisional hernia repair regardless of hernia size. It is not clear whether there is a size of incisional hernias in whom repair would be best performed without mesh. This study aims to compare outcomes of mesh versus suture repairs for incisional hernias <2 cm in size. Incisional hernia repairs from 2012 to 2021 for hernias ≤2 cm in width were queried from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Those with 1-year follow up were considered. Hernia recurrence was defined using composite hernia recurrence, which combines both clinical and patient reported outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed between mesh and non-mesh using body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and drains as covariates. A total of 352 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 132 repairs with mesh and 71 without. There was no difference in recurrence rates at 1 year between mesh and non-mesh repairs (15% vs 24%, P = .12). Mesh was associated with a higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications (11% vs 1%, P = .017). There were no differences in 1-year quality of life scores. The repair of incisional hernias ≤2 cm without mesh results in similar recurrence rates, similar quality of life scores, and lower postoperative early complications compared with repairs with mesh. Our findings suggest that there may be select patients with small incisional hernias that could reasonably undergo incisional hernia repair without mesh. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm ideal candidates and durability of these repairs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mesh has been the acceptable standard for incisional hernia repair regardless of hernia size. It is not clear whether there is a size of incisional hernias in whom repair would be best performed without mesh. This study aims to compare outcomes of mesh versus suture repairs for incisional hernias <2 cm in size.
METHODS
METHODS
Incisional hernia repairs from 2012 to 2021 for hernias ≤2 cm in width were queried from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Those with 1-year follow up were considered. Hernia recurrence was defined using composite hernia recurrence, which combines both clinical and patient reported outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed between mesh and non-mesh using body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and drains as covariates.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 352 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 132 repairs with mesh and 71 without. There was no difference in recurrence rates at 1 year between mesh and non-mesh repairs (15% vs 24%, P = .12). Mesh was associated with a higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications (11% vs 1%, P = .017). There were no differences in 1-year quality of life scores.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The repair of incisional hernias ≤2 cm without mesh results in similar recurrence rates, similar quality of life scores, and lower postoperative early complications compared with repairs with mesh. Our findings suggest that there may be select patients with small incisional hernias that could reasonably undergo incisional hernia repair without mesh. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm ideal candidates and durability of these repairs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37716868
pii: S0039-6060(23)00512-3
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.