Accuracy of lingual straight-wire orthodontic treatment with passive self-ligating brackets and square slot: a retrospective study.
Digital set-up
Lingual straight-wire
Self-ligating lingual appliances
Square slot
Journal
Progress in orthodontics
ISSN: 2196-1042
Titre abrégé: Prog Orthod
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100936353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2023
18 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
03
07
2023
accepted:
26
07
2023
medline:
19
9
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
17
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate the accuracy of torque, tip and rotation and linear intra-arch movements yielded by passive self-ligating lingual straight-wire appliances with brackets featuring square slots. Twenty-five adult Caucasian patients (16 females and 9 males; mean age 26.5 ± 4.3 years) with Class I or mild Class II head-to-head malocclusion were orthodontically treated via passive lingual self-ligating straight-wire appliances (ALIAS, Ormco, Orange, CA) with no extraction. Records were retrospectively analysed, and digital models of pre-treatment (T0), planned (T1) and achieved (T2) phase were acquired for both arches in each patient via an intraoral scanner (Medit I500 (iScan Medit, Seoul, Korea). VAM software (Vectra, Canfield Scientific, Fairfield, NJ, USA) was used to measure both angular values (torque, tip and rotation) and linear intra-arch widths (between canines, first and second premolars and first and second molars). Measurements were obtained for all the movements investigated for each tooth group (incisors, canines, premolars and molars), by arch (maxillary and mandibular) and for both arches at T0, T1 and T2. The accuracy of angular values was compared using Student's t-test against a hypothetical 100%, and among the various tooth groups by post-hoc tests. Transverse linear measurements were investigated by means of the non-parametric Friedman test. The significance threshold was set at 0.05. The mean accuracy of angular values was 77.25 ± 7.71% for torque, 78.41 ± 6.17% for tip and 77.99 ± 6.58% for rotation. In all cases, however, there was a significant difference between planned and achieved movements, and accuracy was significantly lower than the hypothetical 100% for all tooth groups, individual arches and dentition (p < 0.001). For intra-arch diameters, the greatest accuracy values were found for the anterior sectors (83.54 ± 5.19% for the maxillary inter-canine distance) and the lowest for the posterior sectors (67.28% for the maxillary inter-second molar distance). Straight-wire lingual treatment with passive self-ligating appliances featuring with square slot displayed excellent clinical accuracy, albeit with statistical accuracy decreasing antero-posteriorly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37718375
doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00482-3
pii: 10.1186/s40510-023-00482-3
pmc: PMC10505602
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30Informations de copyright
© 2023. Italian Society of Orthodontics.
Références
J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Sep;71(5):348-61
pubmed: 20963544
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):52-61
pubmed: 27858111
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 May;159(5):635-643
pubmed: 33583693
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):691-699.e2
pubmed: 28364892
Prog Orthod. 2014 May 30;15(1):38
pubmed: 24950350
Int Orthod. 2011 Mar;9(1):120-39
pubmed: 21292577
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jun 23;42(3):331-343
pubmed: 31758191
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):27
pubmed: 27593408
J Clin Orthod. 2001 Jan;35(1):46-52
pubmed: 11314528
Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):714-721
pubmed: 36037405
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Sep;140(3):433-43
pubmed: 21889089
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jun;155(6):819-825
pubmed: 31153502
J Clin Orthod. 2013 Jan;47(1):42-9; quiz 63-4
pubmed: 23660712
Prog Orthod. 2017 Nov 13;18(1):35
pubmed: 29130127
J Clin Orthod. 2001 Jun;35(6):381-5
pubmed: 11494941
J Clin Orthod. 2010 Feb;44(2):114-23; quiz 106
pubmed: 20552813
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):302.e1-9
pubmed: 17346581
Angle Orthod. 2012 May;82(3):507-21
pubmed: 21913852
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):127-133
pubmed: 28547915
J Clin Orthod. 2011 Dec;45(12):682-90; quiz 692
pubmed: 22611799
Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Apr;124(2):105-18
pubmed: 26916846
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):109-117
pubmed: 31403837
Prog Orthod. 2013 Jul 26;14:19
pubmed: 24325839
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Dec;160(6):805-813
pubmed: 34344557
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Oct;33(5):476-82
pubmed: 20651044
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):420-425
pubmed: 32620479