High correlation of the subjective elbow value with Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Oxford Elbow Score in patients with elbow dislocation.
Elbow dislocation
Elbow scoring system
Mayo Elbow Performance Score
Oxford Elbow Score
Single assessment numeric evaluation
Subjective elbow score
Journal
JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
18
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation of the Subjective Elbow Value (SEV) with 2 widely used elbow scoring systems: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Oxford Elbow Score (OES) in patients following elbow dislocation. In this retrospective single-center study, patients who sustained an elbow dislocation between January 2008 and December 2019 and were at least 2 years out from injury were included. SEV, OES and MEPS were assessed and statistical correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. A total of 114 patients (61 male, 53 female) with a mean age of 47.1 years (range, 16-70) were analyzed following elbow dislocation. The mean SEV was 87.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2-90.7), mean MEPS was 88.1 (95% CI 85.1-91.0) points and mean OES was 40.0 (95% CI 38.4-41.7) points. Both MEPS (r = 0.710, This study demonstrates that the SEV is a valid tool to assess overall status of the elbow in patients following elbow dislocations and presents an expressive but easy to perform addition to more complex scoring systems.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation of the Subjective Elbow Value (SEV) with 2 widely used elbow scoring systems: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Oxford Elbow Score (OES) in patients following elbow dislocation.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this retrospective single-center study, patients who sustained an elbow dislocation between January 2008 and December 2019 and were at least 2 years out from injury were included. SEV, OES and MEPS were assessed and statistical correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 114 patients (61 male, 53 female) with a mean age of 47.1 years (range, 16-70) were analyzed following elbow dislocation. The mean SEV was 87.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84.2-90.7), mean MEPS was 88.1 (95% CI 85.1-91.0) points and mean OES was 40.0 (95% CI 38.4-41.7) points. Both MEPS (r = 0.710,
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
This study demonstrates that the SEV is a valid tool to assess overall status of the elbow in patients following elbow dislocations and presents an expressive but easy to perform addition to more complex scoring systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37719817
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.04.010
pii: S2666-6383(23)00116-0
pmc: PMC10499643
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
868-871Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Aug;49(10):2771-2777
pubmed: 34170754
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1223-1229
pubmed: 32245727
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8
pubmed: 8773720
Z Orthop Unfall. 2020 Oct;158(5):455-461
pubmed: 31597190
Orthopade. 2016 Aug;45(8):695-700
pubmed: 27385387
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):199-205
pubmed: 24480682
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):308-12
pubmed: 24524980
Z Orthop Unfall. 2020 Apr;158(2):208-213
pubmed: 31533164
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2271-2279
pubmed: 27043345
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):126-132
pubmed: 29103812
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jun;39(6):1146-50
pubmed: 24656392
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Aug 30;30:299
pubmed: 30637083
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):357-362
pubmed: 29248258
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Sep;95(6):415-7
pubmed: 24025290
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94
pubmed: 12469084
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Oct;22(10):1380-94
pubmed: 23790677
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):466-73
pubmed: 18378921
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1725-31
pubmed: 16085611
Br Med Bull. 2008;87:131-61
pubmed: 18539627
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 6;93(13):1220-6
pubmed: 21776575
Int Orthop. 2011 Jun;35(6):851-60
pubmed: 20449590
Indian J Dermatol. 2016 Nov-Dec;61(6):593-601
pubmed: 27904175