Assessing validity of the Klenico diagnostic software system in a large psychotherapeutic inpatient sample.
ICD-10
Klenico
construct validity
diagnostic procedures
digital mental health
multitrait-multimethod
validation
Journal
Frontiers in digital health
ISSN: 2673-253X
Titre abrégé: Front Digit Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101771889
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
28
02
2023
accepted:
31
07
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
18
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mental disorders are often underdiagnosed in routine diagnostic procedures due to the use of unstandardized assessments; this can result in people either not receiving necessary treatment or receiving ineffective treatment for their condition. Klenico is an online diagnostic software system that facilitates diagnosis of mental disorders in adults through the use of standardized procedures. The procedure encompasses two modules, self-report and clinical validation. The current study aimed to confirm the validity of the Klenico assessment in a large clinical sample. Fully anonymized data from 495 adult inpatients were used. ICD-10 diagnoses were made during an initial interview by the clinical staff. Afterwards, patients filled out self-report questionnaires (BDI-II, BSI, EDE-Q, OCI-R, PHQ-D, and Y-BOCS) and completed the Klenico self-report module, which involves selecting and rating the severity of applicable symptoms. Finally, in the clinical validation module, mental health professionals validated the symptoms endorsed in the self-report module. Six Klenico domains were tested against patient self-reports and routine ICD-10 diagnoses by following the multitrait-multimethod approach. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. The Klenico depressive disorders, OCD, and somatoform disorders domains revealed high correlations with the congruent questionnaires (i.e., those pertaining to these specific disorders) and revealed low correlations with the noncongruent questionnaires (i.e., those pertaining to other disorders), therefore evidencing construct validity. For the eating disorders and psychotic disorders domains, divergent validity was demonstrated. For the anxiety disorders domain, although analysis mostly indicated construct validity, this should be further confirmed. Overall, the results largely confirmed the construct validity of the Klenico assessment, demonstrating its use as an easy-to-use, valid, standardized, and comprehensive instrument for diagnosing mental disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37720163
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1176130
pmc: PMC10502166
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1176130Informations de copyright
© 2023 Reutimann, Hübscher, Steiner, Voderholzer and Augsburger.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SR, JS, NH, and MA are employed by Klenico Health AG. We declare that this did not affect the collection or the analysis of the data. UV declares the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015 Sep;17(3):327-35
pubmed: 26487813
Personal Ment Health. 2016 Aug;10(3):244-55
pubmed: 25475425
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):275-285
pubmed: 37159351
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(2):
pubmed: 21977354
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27
pubmed: 15939839
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;55(12):752-60
pubmed: 21172095
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 28;11:72
pubmed: 21526993
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 May;22(4):734-49
pubmed: 17913454
J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(8):1016-35
pubmed: 16621437
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):259-270
pubmed: 30649197
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2007 Sep-Oct;57(9-10):395-404
pubmed: 17590836
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 May;71(5):202-208
pubmed: 33246345
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):874-82
pubmed: 25664634
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:1-4
pubmed: 32942220
Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105
pubmed: 13634291
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;52(1):1-10
pubmed: 27921134
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;3(2):171-8
pubmed: 26851330
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):634-43
pubmed: 22035992
Psychiatry Res. 2001 Dec 31;105(3):255-64
pubmed: 11814544
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137621
pubmed: 26368008
Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Dec;16(4):363-70
pubmed: 7866415
World Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;13(2):153-60
pubmed: 24890068
J Psychiatr Res. 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):325-33
pubmed: 12765855
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 Feb;64(Pt 1):38-52
pubmed: 21506944
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1191:237-261
pubmed: 32002933
Behav Res Ther. 2004 May;42(5):551-67
pubmed: 15033501
Eat Weight Disord. 2017 Sep;22(3):509-514
pubmed: 27039107
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Sep;18(3):169-84
pubmed: 19701924
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Aug 18;29:e161
pubmed: 32807256
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;54(1):37-44.e2
pubmed: 25524788
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):361
pubmed: 30419878
Psychol Med. 2016 Dec;46(16):3359-3369
pubmed: 27623748
J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:94-102
pubmed: 27466747
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 02;10(17):
pubmed: 34501422
J Affect Disord. 2021 Apr 1;284:85-97
pubmed: 33588240
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):476-93
pubmed: 24648481
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):1012-6
pubmed: 2510699
Mol Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;15(8):868-76
pubmed: 19337207
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;61(2):71-9
pubmed: 27253697
Psychiatry Res. 2001 Dec 31;105(3):265-71
pubmed: 11814545
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;13(1):31-9
pubmed: 15653938