At your service: supportiveness of servant leadership, communication frequency and communication channel fostering job satisfaction across generations.

communication frequency and channels generations job satisfaction media richness remote working selfdetermination theory servant leadership synchronicity

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 09 03 2023
accepted: 14 08 2023
medline: 18 9 2023
pubmed: 18 9 2023
entrez: 18 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study contributes to the conversations on the role of 'autonomy supportive' factors in employee wellbeing in remote work contexts by examining the relationships between servant leadership, communication frequency - overall and Building on self-determination theory, incorporating insights from servant leadership, telework, and media richness and synchronicity literatures, we developed hypotheses that were tested In line with expectations, servant leadership had a positive relationship with job satisfaction. Total communication frequency, however, was not related to job satisfaction. Further analyses per communication channel showed that only level 2 e-mail communication frequency was positively related to job satisfaction. In contrast to expectations, the relationships studied were not moderated by generation. We concluded that, for all generations, both servant leadership and frequent (e-mail) communication can be regarded as 'autonomy supportive' factors in employee wellbeing. Paradoxically, whereas servant leadership, considered as a human-centric leadership style, suggests close trust-based employment relationships, employees valued frequent asynchronous communication (

Identifiants

pubmed: 37720648
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183203
pmc: PMC10502177
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1183203

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Coun, De Ruiter and Peters.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):764-72
pubmed: 12940415
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1524-41
pubmed: 18020794
J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2022 May;29(2):208-218
pubmed: 35516094
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0265131
pubmed: 35271671
MLO Med Lab Obs. 2006 Oct;38(10):26-7
pubmed: 17086828
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 11;11:590271
pubmed: 33362656
Workplace Health Saf. 2022 Oct;70(10):459-467
pubmed: 35491882
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Sep 9;6(3):2056305120948255
pubmed: 34192039
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38
pubmed: 17563168
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Feb;86(1):42-51
pubmed: 11302232
Commun Monogr. 2016 Apr 2;83(2):239-263
pubmed: 27226694
Health Care Manage Rev. 2010 Jan-Mar;35(1):46-54
pubmed: 20010012
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1412-21
pubmed: 19025257
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2000 Sep;19(1):65-76
pubmed: 11183655
J Bus Psychol. 2010 Jun;25(2):225-238
pubmed: 20502509
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Aug;87(4):698-714
pubmed: 12184574
J Bus Psychol. 2011 Sep;26(3):249-267
pubmed: 21949466

Auteurs

Martine J H Coun (MJH)

Management Sciences, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.

Melanie De Ruiter (M)

Center for Strategy, Organization and Leadership, Nyenrode Business Universiteit, Breukelen, Netherlands.

Pascale Peters (P)

Center for Strategy, Organization and Leadership, Nyenrode Business Universiteit, Breukelen, Netherlands.
Organization, Leadership and Management, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.

Classifications MeSH