Diversity and composition of flower-visiting insects and related factors in three fruit tree species.
Apis mellifera
Coleoptera
Diptera
agriculture
bees
insect pollination
meteorological conditions
Journal
Biodiversity data journal
ISSN: 1314-2828
Titre abrégé: Biodivers Data J
Pays: Bulgaria
ID NLM: 101619899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
25
01
2023
accepted:
26
06
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
18
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Animal-mediated pollination is an essential ecosystem service for the production of many fruit trees. To reveal the community composition of flower-visiting wild insects which potentially contribute to fruit production and to examine the effects of geographic location, local meteorological conditions and locally introduced domesticated pollinators on them, we investigated the community composition of insects visiting the flowers (hereafter, "visitors") of apple, Japanese pear and Oriental persimmon for 1‒3 years at 20 sites around Japan. While most of the variation (82%) of the community composition was explained by tree species with a slight contribution by geographic distance (2%), maximum temperature and tree species contributed 62% and 41% of the variation in total abundance of the visitors, respectively. Though the dominant families of the visitors varied spatiotemporally, the community composition of the visitors of apple and Japanese pear clearly differed from that of Oriental persimmon. While Andrenidae and Syrphidae together accounted for 46%‒64% of the visitors of apple and Japanese pear, Apidae represented 57% of the visitors of Oriental persimmon. The taxonomic richness, diversity and evenness of the visitors were best predicted by locally introduced domesticated pollinators and local meteorological conditions of wind speed and maximum temperature. Amongst these selected factors, locally introduced domesticated pollinators could have the largest impact. It seemed to be strongly related to the reduction of taxonomic richness, diversity and evenness of the visitors, accounting for 41‒89% of the variation. Results suggested that the community composition and total abundance of potential pollinators were predominantly determined by tree species and temperature, but locally introduced domesticated pollinators could have a determinantal pressure on the taxonomic diversity of the community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37720662
doi: 10.3897/BDJ.11.e100955
pii: 100955
pmc: PMC10504601
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e100955Informations de copyright
Shoko Nakamura, Hisatomo Taki, Tomonori Arai, Ken Funayama, Shunsuke Furihata, Yuki Furui, Takamasa Ikeda, Hiromitsu Inoue, Kiyohiko Kagawa, Hidenari Kishimoto, Mitsuko Kohyama, Michiyo Komatsu, Akihiro Konuma, Ken Nakada, Suguru Nakamura, Nobuo Sawamura, Shoji Sonoda, Masahiro Sueyoshi, Seishi Toda, Katsuhiko Yaginuma, Shunsuke Yamamoto, Koki Yoshida, Tomoyuki Yokoi, Masatoshi Toyama.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No conflict of interest to declare Disclaimer: This article is (co-)authored by any of the Editors-in-Chief, Managing Editors or their deputies in this journal.
Références
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 May;28(5):307-15
pubmed: 23480953
Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2638-49
pubmed: 20957958
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 23;13:826205
pubmed: 35283885
Mol Ecol. 2015 Mar;24(5):993-1006
pubmed: 25626470
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1557-66
pubmed: 19218579
Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 10;6:7989
pubmed: 26258282
Ecol Lett. 2021 Dec;24(12):2648-2659
pubmed: 34532944
Science. 2019 Jan 18;363(6424):282-284
pubmed: 30655441
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):146-51
pubmed: 26621730
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Oct 7;275(1648):2283-91
pubmed: 18595841
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Sep;28(9):524-30
pubmed: 23746938
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35954
pubmed: 22563427
Science. 2018 Feb 16;359(6377):791-793
pubmed: 29449491
Science. 2015 Mar 27;347(6229):1255957
pubmed: 25721506
Ecol Lett. 2007 Apr;10(4):299-314
pubmed: 17355569
Am J Bot. 2011 Mar;98(3):528-38
pubmed: 21613144
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Oct;25(10):3516-3527
pubmed: 31293015
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9386
pubmed: 29925965
Nature. 2014 Feb 20;506(7488):364-6
pubmed: 24553241
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843):
pubmed: 27881750
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):637-48
pubmed: 22583836
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Sep;36(9):822-836
pubmed: 34088543
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 22;282(1801):20142620
pubmed: 25567651
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
pubmed: 20188434
Curr Biol. 2008 Oct 28;18(20):1572-5
pubmed: 18926704
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1608-11
pubmed: 23449997
Naturwissenschaften. 2009 Oct;96(10):1157-68
pubmed: 19565211
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 1;10(1):1481
pubmed: 30931943
Oecologia. 2005 Jan;142(1):28-37
pubmed: 15338417