In-vitro comparison of two different toothbrush bristles about peri-implant sulcus penetration.
dental implant
implant maintenance
oral hygiene
toothbrushing
Journal
International journal of dental hygiene
ISSN: 1601-5037
Titre abrégé: Int J Dent Hyg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2023
18 Sep 2023
Historique:
revised:
11
08
2023
received:
10
09
2022
accepted:
28
08
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
18
9
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The aim of this preclinical study was to compare the ability of tapered and cylindrical bristles to penetrate the peri-implant sulcus. A full mandibular dental arch was reproduced in plaster cast. In site #3.6 a hollow glass cylinder was positioned simulating a 4 mm diameter implant and the gingival component was recreated by using dedicated silicone. A Bass brushing technique was performed from the vestibular side in humid environment. During it, the penetration of the bristles between the gum and the implant was recorded by mean of an optic fibre fixed inside the cylinder. The protocol included 5 toothbrushes per group and 10 tests per toothbrush, for a total of 50 assessments for each of the two groups. A scale of 5 grades for bristle penetration was defined: grade 0 (× < 2 mm), grade 1 (2 ≤ × < 3 mm), grade 2 (3 ≤ × < 4 mm), grade 3 (4 ≤ × < 5 mm) and grade 4 (5 ≤ × < 8 mm). From the video recordings the highest value of penetration was identified for each test. The tapered bristles showed an 8 times greater penetration capacity (p = 0.001) in respect to the cylindrical bristles (multilevel analysis). The percentage of tests reaching depths ≥3 mm was 86% for tapered group and 28% for the cylindrical group. This preclinical study shows a clear and superior penetration capacity of the tapered bristles in respect to traditional cylindrical ones. For tapered bristles, a potentially greater hygienic efficacy around dental implants is suggested.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Dental Hygiene published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
van Steenberghe D, Klinge B, Lindén U, Quirynen M, Herrmann I, Garpland C. Periodontal indices around natural and titanium abutments: a longitudinal multicenter study. J Periodontol. 1993;64(6):538-541. doi:10.1902/jop.1993.64.6.538
Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S158-S171. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12334
Pontoriero R, Tonelli MP, Carnevale G, Mombelli A, Nyman SR, Lang NP. Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(4):254-259.
Salvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S, Sculean A, Lang NP, Ramseier CA. Reversibility of experimental peri-implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):182-190. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02220.x
Katsanoulas T, Reneè I, Attström R. The effect of supragingival plaque control on the composition of the subgingival flora in periodontal pockets. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19(10):760-765. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1992.tb02167.x
Tezal M, Scannapieco FA, Wactawski-Wende J, Grossi SG, Genco RJ. Supragingival plaque may modify the effects of subgingival bacteria on attachment loss. J Periodontol. 2006;77(5):808-813. doi:10.1902/jop.2006.050332
Schaumann S, Staufenbiel I, Scherer R, et al. Pyrosequencing of supra- and subgingival biofilms from inflamed peri-implant and periodontal sites. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:157. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-157
Louropoulou A, Slot DE, Van Der WF. Mechanical self-performed oral hygiene of implant supported restorations: a systematic review. J Evidence-Based Dental. 2014;14 (SUPPL):60-69.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.03.008
Jepsen S, Berglundh T, Genco R, et al. Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: managing peri-implant mucositis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(Suppl 16):S152-S157. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12369
Westfelt E, Rylander H, Dahlén G, Lindhe J. The effect of supragingival plaque control on the progression of advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1998;25(7):536-541. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02484.x
Ximénez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Som S, Thompson M, Torresyap G, Socransky SS. The effect of repeated professional supragingival plaque removal on the composition of the supra- and subgingival microbiota. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(9):637-647. doi:10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009637.x
Westfelt E. Rationale of mechanical plaque control. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(3 Pt 2):263-267.
Yankell SL, Shi X, Emling RC. Laboratory evaluations of two toothbrushes for removal of artificial plaque above, around and below the gingival margin. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;14(1):19-22.
Hotta M, Sekine I, Imade S, Sano A. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrush bristles regarding efficacy of access to occlusal fissures. J Clin Dent. 2002;13(6):225-227.
Hotta M, Yoshida T, Sekine I, Imada S, Sano A. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrushes regarding subgingival access efficacy. J Clin Dent. 1997;8(6):156-158.
Checchi L, Montevecchi M, Gatto RM, Moreschi A, Checchi V. Clinical efficacy of two toothbrushes with different bristles. Int J Dent Hyg. 2007;5(4):242-246. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00258.x
Hotta M, Imade S, Kotake H, Sano A, Yamamoto K. Artificial plaque removal from interproximal tooth surfaces (maxillary premolar and molar) of a jaw model. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009;7(3):283-287.
Langa GPJ, Muniz FWMG, Wagner TP, Silva CFE, Rösing CK. Anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis efficacy of different bristle stiffness and end-shape toothbrushes on interproximal surfaces: a systematic review with META-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21(2):101548. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101548
Sgan-Cohen HD, Vered Y. A clinical trial of the meridol toothbrush with conical filaments: evaluation of clinical effectiveness and subjective satisfaction. J Clin Dent. 2005;16(4):109-113.
Montevecchi M, Moreschi A, Gatto MR, Checchi L, Checchi V. Evaluation of clinical effectiveness and subjective satisfaction of a new toothbrush for postsurgical hygiene care: a randomized split-mouth double-blind clinical trial. Scientific World Journal. 2015;2015:1-6. doi:10.1155/2015/828794
Ni L, Tang R, He T, et al. Clinical effect of a manual toothbrush with tapered filaments on dental plaque and gingivitis reduction. Am J Dent. 2017;30(5):272-278.
Hoogteijling F, Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL, Van der Weijden GA, Slot DE. The effect of tapered toothbrush filaments compared to end-rounded filaments on dental plaque, gingivitis and gingival abrasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2018;16(1):3-12. doi:10.1111/idh.12272
Bass CC. An effective method of personal oral hygiene. J La State Med Soc. 1954;106(2):57-73.
Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, Van der Velden U. Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol. 1998;25(5):413-416. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02464.x
Ganss C, Schlueter N, Preiss S, Klimek J. Tooth brushing habits in uninstructed adults-frequency, technique, duration and force. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(2):203-208. doi:10.1007/s00784-008-0230-8
Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Versteeg PA, Piscaer M, Van der Velden U. High and low brushing force in relation to efficacy and gingival abrasion. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(8):620-624. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00529.x
Ranzan N, Muniz FWMG, Rösing CK. Are bristle stiffness and bristle end-shape related to adverse effects on soft tissues during toothbrushing? A systematic review. Int Dent J. 2019;69(3):171-182. doi:10.1111/idj.12421
Hamza B, Svellenti L, Körner P, Attin T, Wegehaupt FJ. Effect of tapered-end and round-end bristles on the abrasive dentine wear applying increasing brushing forces. Acta Odontol Scand. 2022;11:1-5. doi:10.1080/00016357.2022.2035816
Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S278-S285. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12956
Hanioka T, Nagata H, Murakami Y, Tamagawa H, Shizukuishi S. Mechanical stimulation by toothbrushing increases oxygen sufficiency in human gingivae. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20(8):591-594.
Agematsu H, Watanabe H, Fukayama M, et al. Histological studies on the effects of tooth brushing on repair of alveolar bone after periodontal osseous surgery in the rat incisor. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1993;34(3):95-105.
Montevecchi M, De Blasi V, Checchi L. Is implant flossing a risk-free procedure? A case report with a 6-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):e79-e83. doi:10.11607/jomi.4263
van Velzen FJJ, Lang NP, Schulten EAJM, Ten Bruggenkate CM. Dental floss as a possible risk for the development of peri-implant disease: an observational study of 10 cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(5):618-621. doi:10.1111/clr.12650
Montevecchi M, Valeriani L, Franchi L, Sforza NM, Piana G. Evaluation of floss remnants after implant flossing in three different implant conditions: a preclinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(3):569-573. doi:10.11607/jomi.8350
Checchi L, Minguzzi S, Franchi M, Forteleoni G. Toothbrush filaments end-rounding: stereomicroscope analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(4):360-364.