3D-printed sheet jet for stable megahertz liquid sample delivery at X-ray free-electron lasers.
XFELs
fast SAX
fast WAX
free-electron lasers
injectors
sample delivery
single particles
time-resolved studies
Journal
IUCrJ
ISSN: 2052-2525
Titre abrégé: IUCrJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101623101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2023
01 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
26
06
2023
accepted:
12
09
2023
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
18
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) can probe chemical and biological reactions as they unfold with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. A principal challenge in this pursuit involves the delivery of samples to the X-ray interaction point in such a way that produces data of the highest possible quality and with maximal efficiency. This is hampered by intrinsic constraints posed by the light source and operation within a beamline environment. For liquid samples, the solution typically involves some form of high-speed liquid jet, capable of keeping up with the rate of X-ray pulses. However, conventional jets are not ideal because of radiation-induced explosions of the jet, as well as their cylindrical geometry combined with the X-ray pointing instability of many beamlines which causes the interaction volume to differ for every pulse. This complicates data analysis and contributes to measurement errors. An alternative geometry is a liquid sheet jet which, with its constant thickness over large areas, eliminates the problems related to X-ray pointing. Since liquid sheets can be made very thin, the radiation-induced explosion is reduced, boosting their stability. These are especially attractive for experiments which benefit from small interaction volumes such as fluctuation X-ray scattering and several types of spectroscopy. Although their use has increased for soft X-ray applications in recent years, there has not yet been wide-scale adoption at XFELs. Here, gas-accelerated liquid sheet jet sample injection is demonstrated at the European XFEL SPB/SFX nano focus beamline. Its performance relative to a conventional liquid jet is evaluated and superior performance across several key factors has been found. This includes a thickness profile ranging from hundreds of nanometres to 60 nm, a fourfold increase in background stability and favorable radiation-induced explosion dynamics at high repetition rates up to 1.13 MHz. Its minute thickness also suggests that ultrafast single-particle solution scattering is a possibility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37721770
pii: S2052252523007972
doi: 10.1107/S2052252523007972
pmc: PMC10619454
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
662-670Subventions
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet
ID : 2018-00234
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet
ID : 2019-06092
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet
ID : 2017-05336
Organisme : Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
ID : ITM17-0455
Organisme : Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning
ID : CTS 19-227
Organisme : National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences
ID : DBI-1231306
Organisme : National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences
ID : DBI-1943448
Organisme : National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences
ID : MCB-1817862
Informations de copyright
open access.
Références
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2022 Sep 1;29(Pt 5):1273-1283
pubmed: 36073887
J Phys Chem Lett. 2020 Mar 19;11(6):1981-1988
pubmed: 32073862
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 Jan 1;26(Pt 1):74-82
pubmed: 30655470
Langmuir. 2022 Oct 25;38(42):12822-12832
pubmed: 36220141
Struct Dyn. 2015 Aug 18;2(5):054301
pubmed: 26798824
Struct Dyn. 2020 Mar 09;7(2):024301
pubmed: 32161776
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 May 1;26(Pt 3):660-676
pubmed: 31074429
J Phys Chem A. 2018 Nov 15;122(45):8982-8988
pubmed: 30362355
Opt Express. 2016 May 30;24(11):11515-30
pubmed: 27410079
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Dec 09;9:1048932
pubmed: 36567947
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2022 Mar 1;29(Pt 2):331-346
pubmed: 35254295
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 10;9(1):1353
pubmed: 29636445
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):11772-11777
pubmed: 30373827
Opt Express. 2020 Jul 20;28(15):21749-21765
pubmed: 32752448
J Appl Crystallogr. 2016 Apr 18;49(Pt 3):1042-1047
pubmed: 27275147
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 Mar 1;26(Pt 2):339-345
pubmed: 30855241
IUCrJ. 2018 Jul 27;5(Pt 5):574-584
pubmed: 30224961
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2019 Mar 1;26(Pt 2):328-332
pubmed: 30855239
Nat Methods. 2012 Sep;9(9):854-5
pubmed: 22936162
Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Oct 13;119(15):158102
pubmed: 29077445
Lab Chip. 2014 May 21;14(10):1733-45
pubmed: 24671443
Struct Dyn. 2017 Aug 14;4(5):054902
pubmed: 28852689
Rev Sci Instrum. 2020 Oct 1;91(10):105109
pubmed: 33138597
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021 Jan 21;23(2):1308-1316
pubmed: 33367391
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 13;9(1):3723
pubmed: 30213950
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Jul;84(1 Pt 1):011921
pubmed: 21867227
Rev Sci Instrum. 2017 Aug;88(8):083117
pubmed: 28863712
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 31;11(1):657
pubmed: 32005876
Nat Rev Phys. 2021 Apr;3(4):264-282
pubmed: 34212130