Adequacy of Size Matching With Predicted Heart Mass Ratio in Diverse Types of Cardiomyopathies.

Predicted heart mass ratio (PHMr) has been proposed as an optimal size metric in the selection of a donor heart for transplant; however, it is not known if the same size matching criteria pertains uniformly to all types of cardiomyopathies. Heart transplant recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry database were categorized into 6 groups based on the type of cardiomyopathy, dilated, coronary artery disease, hypertrophic, restrictive, valvular and adult congenital heart disease. Patients in each group of etiology were stratified based on the PHMr into 5 groups: severely undersized <0.86, moderately undersized 0.86 to 0.94, matched 0.95 to 1.04, moderately oversized 1.05 to 1.24, and severely oversized >1.25. The survival and cause of death of patients in each etiology group were reviewed. The United Network for Organ Sharing registry database from January 1987 to July 2021 included 53,573 patients who received a heart transplant. Compared with patients with size matched hearts, recipients with dilated (hazard ratio 1.17, p = 0.001) and valvular (hazard ratio 1.79, p = 0.032) cardiomyopathy who had an undersized heart with PHMr <0.86 had decreased survival. In addition, the survival of patients with hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy and adult congenital heart disease was not affected by size matching based on the PHMr (0.601 and 0.079, respectively, p = 0.873). In conclusion, our analysis suggests that the size matching criteria based on PHMr may not be uniform to all patients across various etiologies of cardiomyopathy. Therefore, the data can be used to increase the acceptance rate of donor hearts, particularly, for patients with hypertrophic, restrictive cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease in which size matching is less significant for survival outcome.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.