In Vitro Evaluation of the Effects of Different Beverages on the Surface Microhardness of a Single-Shade Universal Composite.
beverages
composite resin
single shade composite
surface microhardness
vickers microhardness
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
12
07
2023
accepted:
17
08
2023
medline:
19
9
2023
pubmed:
19
9
2023
entrez:
19
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze the influence of various beverages on the surface microhardness of a single-shade composite resin. Seventy-five Omnichroma composite discs were fabricated and divided into five subgroups according to the beverages. The groups were Group A: tea; Group B: coffee; Group C: beer; Group D: whisky; and Group E: artificial saliva. The samples were immersed in their respective beverages for 15 minutes per day for 15 days. The Vickers microhardness values were taken before and after the immersion of the composite disc samples in their respective beverages. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA), with a statistical significance level of 5%. It was observed that there was a reduction in the surface microhardness of the composite resin after immersion in most of the solutions. An increase in the mean percentage change of surface microhardness was observed in the beer group (29%; mean difference = 16.52±12.05), followed by the coffee group (27.2%; mean difference = 15.51±9.28). The least mean percentage change in microhardness was noted in group E, artificial saliva (8.5%; mean difference = 4.81±3.04). The surface microhardness of composite resin can be influenced by the type of beverages used for immersion and the duration of immersion. However, it is important to note that the interaction between composite resin and various beverages is influenced by a complex interplay of multiple variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37724241
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43669
pmc: PMC10505092
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43669Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Vejendla et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Oral Med. 1975 Oct-Dec;30(4):99-104
pubmed: 1102637
Biomaterials. 2003 May;24(10):1787-95
pubmed: 12593961
Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):628-34
pubmed: 14531611
Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 10;222(5):337-344
pubmed: 28281590
Dent Mater J. 2012;31(4):689-96
pubmed: 22864226
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Mar-Apr;21(2):124-31
pubmed: 23739850
J Conserv Dent. 2014 May;17(3):261-5
pubmed: 24944451
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Sep;31(5):465-470
pubmed: 31095870
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Mar;33(2):394-400
pubmed: 32844567
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):370-6
pubmed: 16198175
Eur J Dent. 2010 Jan;4(1):50-6
pubmed: 20046480
Dent Mater J. 1999 Dec;18(4):453-61
pubmed: 10786167
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17
pubmed: 34325496
Biomaterials. 2002 Apr;23(8):1897-904
pubmed: 11950060
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1601-1607
pubmed: 29071561
Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):723-7
pubmed: 14653286
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 05;14(11):
pubmed: 34198751
Dent Mater. 2017 Mar;33(3):e101-e114
pubmed: 27993372
Gen Dent. 1998 May-Jun;46(3):256-63; quiz 264-5
pubmed: 9693539
Dent Mater. 1992 Sep;8(5):305-9
pubmed: 1303372
Oper Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):213-9
pubmed: 15853107
Oper Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):642-9
pubmed: 15646219
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Nov;28(11):1015-21
pubmed: 11722717
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;24(10):1499-1505
pubmed: 34657016