Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Housing First for Youth Intervention for Youth Experiencing Homelessness in Canada: Protocol for a Multisite, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.
Canada
Housing First for Youth
Making the Shift
RCT
randomized controlled trial
youth homelessness
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Sep 2023
19 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
21
02
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
revised:
11
07
2023
medline:
19
9
2023
pubmed:
19
9
2023
entrez:
19
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emerging evidence at the international level suggests that the Housing First approach could improve the housing stability of young people experiencing homelessness. However, there is a dearth of literature in Canada on whether the Housing First intervention for young people experiencing homelessness can improve outcomes including housing stability, health and well-being, and access to complementary supports. Adapted from the original Housing First model, Housing First for Youth (HF4Y) was developed in Canada as a rights-based approach tailored specifically for young people aged 16 to 24 years who are experiencing or are at risk of homelessness. The Making the Shift Youth Homelessness Social Innovation Lab is testing the effectiveness of the HF4Y intervention in Canada. The objective of this study is to determine whether the HF4Y model results in better participant-level outcomes than treatment-as-usual services for young people experiencing homelessness in 2 urban settings: Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario. Primary outcomes include housing stability, health and well-being, and complementary supports, and secondary outcomes include employment and educational attainment and social inclusion. The HF4Y study used a multisite, mixed methods, randomized controlled trial research approach for data collection and analysis. Eligible participants included young people aged 16 to 24 years who were experiencing homelessness or housing precarity. The participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment-as-usual group or the housing first intervention group. Survey and interview data in Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario are being collected at multiple time points (3-6 months) over 4 years to capture a range of outcomes. Analytic strategies for quantitative data will include mixed-effects modeling for repeated measures and logistic models. A thematic analysis will be used to analyze qualitative data based on participants' narratives and life journeys through homelessness. Furthermore, program fidelity evaluations are conducted within each HF4Y program. These evaluations assess how well the intervention aligns with the HF4Y model and identify any areas that may require adjustments or additional support. The HF4Y study has received human participant research ethics approval from the Office of Research Ethics at York University. Recruitment was conducted between February 2018 and March 2020. Data collection is expected to be completed at both sites by March 2024. A preliminary analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data collected between baseline and 24 months is underway. This pilot randomized controlled trial is the first to test the effectiveness of the HF4Y intervention in Canada. The findings of this study will enhance our understanding of how to effectively deliver and scale up the HF4Y intervention, with the aim of continually improving the HF4Y model to promote better outcomes for youth. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) ISRCTN10505930; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10505930. DERR1-10.2196/46690.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Emerging evidence at the international level suggests that the Housing First approach could improve the housing stability of young people experiencing homelessness. However, there is a dearth of literature in Canada on whether the Housing First intervention for young people experiencing homelessness can improve outcomes including housing stability, health and well-being, and access to complementary supports. Adapted from the original Housing First model, Housing First for Youth (HF4Y) was developed in Canada as a rights-based approach tailored specifically for young people aged 16 to 24 years who are experiencing or are at risk of homelessness.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The Making the Shift Youth Homelessness Social Innovation Lab is testing the effectiveness of the HF4Y intervention in Canada. The objective of this study is to determine whether the HF4Y model results in better participant-level outcomes than treatment-as-usual services for young people experiencing homelessness in 2 urban settings: Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario. Primary outcomes include housing stability, health and well-being, and complementary supports, and secondary outcomes include employment and educational attainment and social inclusion.
METHODS
METHODS
The HF4Y study used a multisite, mixed methods, randomized controlled trial research approach for data collection and analysis. Eligible participants included young people aged 16 to 24 years who were experiencing homelessness or housing precarity. The participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment-as-usual group or the housing first intervention group. Survey and interview data in Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario are being collected at multiple time points (3-6 months) over 4 years to capture a range of outcomes. Analytic strategies for quantitative data will include mixed-effects modeling for repeated measures and logistic models. A thematic analysis will be used to analyze qualitative data based on participants' narratives and life journeys through homelessness. Furthermore, program fidelity evaluations are conducted within each HF4Y program. These evaluations assess how well the intervention aligns with the HF4Y model and identify any areas that may require adjustments or additional support.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The HF4Y study has received human participant research ethics approval from the Office of Research Ethics at York University. Recruitment was conducted between February 2018 and March 2020. Data collection is expected to be completed at both sites by March 2024. A preliminary analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data collected between baseline and 24 months is underway.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot randomized controlled trial is the first to test the effectiveness of the HF4Y intervention in Canada. The findings of this study will enhance our understanding of how to effectively deliver and scale up the HF4Y intervention, with the aim of continually improving the HF4Y model to promote better outcomes for youth.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) ISRCTN10505930; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10505930.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/46690.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37725430
pii: v12i1e46690
doi: 10.2196/46690
pmc: PMC10548326
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e46690Informations de copyright
©Stephen Gaetz, Ahmad Bonakdar, John Ecker, Cora MacDonald, Sophia Ilyniak, Ashley Ward, Lauren Kimura, Aranie Vijayaratnam, Emmanuel Banchani. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 19.09.2023.
Références
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12
pubmed: 21897887
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1991 Spring;5(1):39-51; discussion 53-6
pubmed: 2063043
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):155-61
pubmed: 17673104
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Dec;36(3-4):223-38
pubmed: 16389497
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):1154
pubmed: 31438912
JAMA. 2015 Mar 3;313(9):905-15
pubmed: 25734732
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393
pubmed: 19564179
Am J Addict. 2006;15 Suppl 1:80-91
pubmed: 17182423
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):30
pubmed: 28219336
Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605
pubmed: 6622612
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Jul;77(3):350-61
pubmed: 17696663
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Apr;51(4):487-93
pubmed: 10737824
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 19;14:118
pubmed: 25407057
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):651-6
pubmed: 15054020
BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1716
pubmed: 29916205
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 May;73(5):379-387
pubmed: 30777888
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000323
pubmed: 22102645
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 12;6(9):e010581
pubmed: 27619826
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 20;8(12):e15557
pubmed: 31859688
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 6;14(1):77
pubmed: 31387596
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162
pubmed: 29207961
Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4):
pubmed: 27681009
Healthc Manage Forum. 2019 Mar;32(2):73-77
pubmed: 30722701
Yale J Biol Med. 2013 Sep 20;86(3):343-58
pubmed: 24058309
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496
pubmed: 19744976
Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310
pubmed: 15085902
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 10;12:1341-9
pubmed: 27354804
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 May 05;7:48-56
pubmed: 29696168
Trials. 2020 May 11;21(1):393
pubmed: 32393334
Ment Health Serv Res. 2002 Mar;4(1):13-28
pubmed: 12090303
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1075-1078
pubmed: 29085540
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Aug;20(11):2023-2033
pubmed: 28560947
J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(2):105-13
pubmed: 19711709
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151
pubmed: 30477443
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3:32
pubmed: 26376626
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):463-9
pubmed: 25639993
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 22;19(1):334
pubmed: 30902081
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1754-1763
pubmed: 32323903
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199782
pubmed: 31433483
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Mar;67(3):275-81
pubmed: 26620289