Use of Smartphone Apps for Improving Physical Function Capacity in Cardiac Patient Rehabilitation: Systematic Review.
cardiac rehabilitation
exercise
physical capacity
smartphone apps
Journal
JMIRx med
ISSN: 2563-6316
Titre abrégé: JMIRx Med
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101776650
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Sep 2021
17 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
15
09
2020
accepted:
31
05
2021
revised:
06
04
2021
medline:
17
9
2021
pubmed:
17
9
2021
entrez:
19
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based approach for preventing secondary cardiac events. Smartphone apps are starting to be used in CR to give patients real-time feedback on their health, connect them remotely with their medical team, and allow them to perform their rehabilitation at home. The use of smartphone apps is becoming omnipresent and has real potential in impacting patients in need of CR. This paper provides critical examinations and summaries of existing research studies with an in-depth analysis of not only the individual studies but also the larger patterns that have emerged with smartphone apps in CR as well as their significance for practice change. A systematic review was conducted through broad database searches that focused on evaluating randomized controlled trials, in compliance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) expectations. A total of 43 articles were evaluated, and 6 were chosen for this review. The dates of the articles ranged from 2014-2020, and the studies focused on the population of cardiac outpatients who needed CR after suffering a cardiac event, with interventions using a smartphone that incorporated the CR standards of the American Heart Association. The outcomes measured were directed at focusing on improved exercise function capacity, valued at a significance level of P<.05, for improved 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and peak oxygen uptake (PVO In the evaluated articles, the results were inconsistent for significant positive effects of CR smartphone apps on cardiac patients' physical function capacity in terms of the 6MWT and PVO Because evidence in the literature suggests nonhomogeneous results for successful use of smartphone apps in CR, it is crucial to investigate the potential reasons for this inconsistency. An important observation from this systematic review is that smartphone apps used in CR have better clinical outcomes related to physical function capacity if the app automatically records information or provides real-time feedback to participants about their progress, compared to apps that only educate and encourage use while requiring the participant to manually log their CR activities. Additional factors to consider during these studies include the starting health of the patients, the sample sizes, and the specific components of CR that the smartphone apps are using. Overall, more clinical trials are needed that implement smartphone apps with these factors in mind, while placing stronger emphasis on using biosensing capabilities that can automatically log results and send them to providers on a real-time dashboard.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an evidence-based approach for preventing secondary cardiac events. Smartphone apps are starting to be used in CR to give patients real-time feedback on their health, connect them remotely with their medical team, and allow them to perform their rehabilitation at home. The use of smartphone apps is becoming omnipresent and has real potential in impacting patients in need of CR.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This paper provides critical examinations and summaries of existing research studies with an in-depth analysis of not only the individual studies but also the larger patterns that have emerged with smartphone apps in CR as well as their significance for practice change.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted through broad database searches that focused on evaluating randomized controlled trials, in compliance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) expectations. A total of 43 articles were evaluated, and 6 were chosen for this review. The dates of the articles ranged from 2014-2020, and the studies focused on the population of cardiac outpatients who needed CR after suffering a cardiac event, with interventions using a smartphone that incorporated the CR standards of the American Heart Association. The outcomes measured were directed at focusing on improved exercise function capacity, valued at a significance level of P<.05, for improved 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and peak oxygen uptake (PVO
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the evaluated articles, the results were inconsistent for significant positive effects of CR smartphone apps on cardiac patients' physical function capacity in terms of the 6MWT and PVO
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Because evidence in the literature suggests nonhomogeneous results for successful use of smartphone apps in CR, it is crucial to investigate the potential reasons for this inconsistency. An important observation from this systematic review is that smartphone apps used in CR have better clinical outcomes related to physical function capacity if the app automatically records information or provides real-time feedback to participants about their progress, compared to apps that only educate and encourage use while requiring the participant to manually log their CR activities. Additional factors to consider during these studies include the starting health of the patients, the sample sizes, and the specific components of CR that the smartphone apps are using. Overall, more clinical trials are needed that implement smartphone apps with these factors in mind, while placing stronger emphasis on using biosensing capabilities that can automatically log results and send them to providers on a real-time dashboard.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37725554
pii: v2i3e21906
doi: 10.2196/21906
pmc: PMC10414376
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e21906Informations de copyright
©Katherine Tuttle, Arpad Kelemen, Yulan Liang. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 17.09.2021.
Références
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(13):1273-8
pubmed: 12831822
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 09;6(2):e14669
pubmed: 21347403
Eur Heart J. 2010 Aug;31(16):1967-74
pubmed: 20643803
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Nov;22(6):1938-1948
pubmed: 29990228
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492
pubmed: 29386200
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 11;16(12):e282
pubmed: 25498992
Int J Telemed Appl. 2014;2014:415868
pubmed: 25574165
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):327-34
pubmed: 24866355
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(6):701-9
pubmed: 24817694
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1770-9
pubmed: 24973083
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Nov;27(16):1782-1792
pubmed: 32106713
Circulation. 2007 May 22;115(20):2675-82
pubmed: 17513578
Am Heart J. 2017 Jun;188:65-72
pubmed: 28577682
Fed Pract. 2017 May;34(5):34-39
pubmed: 30766279
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):118-126
pubmed: 31825132
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2017 Mar;37(2):111-118
pubmed: 27676465
Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Aug 1;32(5):432-440
pubmed: 32868661
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jan;13(1):e005902
pubmed: 31931615
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Jun;12(6):350-60
pubmed: 25801714