Relatives' experiences of visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave: a PREMs study in Valais Hospital, Switzerland.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 19 01 2023
accepted: 08 09 2023
medline: 21 9 2023
pubmed: 20 9 2023
entrez: 19 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

During the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries introduced temporary visiting restrictions on the relatives of acute care hospital patients, whether or not they were infected with SARS-CoV-2. This affected relatives' psychological and emotional states and how closely they could be involved in their loved one's hospitalization. Investigate relatives' experiences of visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave and the support offered by Valais Hospital's healthcare staff. Relatives and patients who had been discharged between February 28 and May 13, 2020, were asked to complete a patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) questionnaire, whether or not they had been infected by SARS-CoV-2. Relatives were asked about how visiting restrictions had affected them, their perceptions of the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of communication concerning their loved ones' health status during their hospitalization, and the information received from healthcare staff. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed. Of 866 PREMs questionnaires returned, 818 were analyzable, and 543 relatives had experienced visiting restrictions to their loved ones: 92 relatives (87%) of COVID-19 patients and 451 relatives (66%) of non-infected patients, with heterogenous effects on their psychological and affective status. Overall, whether or not relatives were subjected to visiting restrictions, they perceived themselves to be well treated, well informed, and that communication with hospital healthcare staff was satisfactory. However, relatives subjected to visiting restrictions reported significantly lower scores on the quality of communication than other relatives. The relatives of patients in gynecology/obstetrics and internal medicine wards were significantly more affected by visiting restrictions than were the relatives of patients in other wards. Numerous relatives subjected to visiting restrictions reported regular communication with their loved ones or with healthcare staff, at least once a day (n = 179), either via videoconferences using FaceTime®, WhatsApp®, Zoom®, or Skype® or via mobile phone text messages. Visiting restrictions affected relatives differently depending on the wards their loved ones were hospitalized. Healthcare institutions should investigate the utility of visiting restrictions on patients, how they affect relatives, and how to improve personalized patient-relative communications. Future research should attempt to develop reliable, validated measurement instruments of relatives' experiences of acute-care visiting restrictions during pandemics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
During the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries introduced temporary visiting restrictions on the relatives of acute care hospital patients, whether or not they were infected with SARS-CoV-2. This affected relatives' psychological and emotional states and how closely they could be involved in their loved one's hospitalization.
STUDY AIMS OBJECTIVE
Investigate relatives' experiences of visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave and the support offered by Valais Hospital's healthcare staff.
METHODS METHODS
Relatives and patients who had been discharged between February 28 and May 13, 2020, were asked to complete a patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) questionnaire, whether or not they had been infected by SARS-CoV-2. Relatives were asked about how visiting restrictions had affected them, their perceptions of the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of communication concerning their loved ones' health status during their hospitalization, and the information received from healthcare staff. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 866 PREMs questionnaires returned, 818 were analyzable, and 543 relatives had experienced visiting restrictions to their loved ones: 92 relatives (87%) of COVID-19 patients and 451 relatives (66%) of non-infected patients, with heterogenous effects on their psychological and affective status. Overall, whether or not relatives were subjected to visiting restrictions, they perceived themselves to be well treated, well informed, and that communication with hospital healthcare staff was satisfactory. However, relatives subjected to visiting restrictions reported significantly lower scores on the quality of communication than other relatives. The relatives of patients in gynecology/obstetrics and internal medicine wards were significantly more affected by visiting restrictions than were the relatives of patients in other wards. Numerous relatives subjected to visiting restrictions reported regular communication with their loved ones or with healthcare staff, at least once a day (n = 179), either via videoconferences using FaceTime®, WhatsApp®, Zoom®, or Skype® or via mobile phone text messages.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Visiting restrictions affected relatives differently depending on the wards their loved ones were hospitalized. Healthcare institutions should investigate the utility of visiting restrictions on patients, how they affect relatives, and how to improve personalized patient-relative communications. Future research should attempt to develop reliable, validated measurement instruments of relatives' experiences of acute-care visiting restrictions during pandemics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37726727
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10013-9
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10013-9
pmc: PMC10510254
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1008

Subventions

Organisme : University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland HES-SO Valais
ID : Sagex: 101205

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Front Sociol. 2022 Jan 11;6:769199
pubmed: 35071401
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Jul 13;76(8):e142-e146
pubmed: 33539505
Chronic Illn. 2015 Mar;11(1):21-32
pubmed: 24740555
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 23;11(9):e048227
pubmed: 34556510
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2029540
pubmed: 33211114
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Dec;54:102355
pubmed: 33271684
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 06;8:646506
pubmed: 34295908
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;15(8):1591-1593
pubmed: 32748127
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):1623
pubmed: 34488693
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):786-789
pubmed: 33409888
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;28(1):E299-E306
pubmed: 33729198
BMC Nurs. 2018 Jul 28;17:32
pubmed: 30069163
Am J Med. 2022 Oct;135(10):1158-1167.e3
pubmed: 35472383
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):
pubmed: 32326274
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:412-414
pubmed: 33129961
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Oct;18(10):1685-1692
pubmed: 33617747
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:53-57
pubmed: 34042704
Med Care. 2016 Jul;54(7):697-705
pubmed: 27111748
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110526
pubmed: 34051515
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2020 Sep;19(3):105-111
pubmed: 32324622
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1715-1721
pubmed: 33835314
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):134-135
pubmed: 33186677
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Jul;17(4):e12451
pubmed: 35156293
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Nov;23(4):447-452
pubmed: 36751350
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Oct;24(5):540-542
pubmed: 33155873
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:104000
pubmed: 34242976
Mater Sociomed. 2019 Mar;31(1):57-61
pubmed: 31213958
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Apr;49(4):516-520
pubmed: 32991966
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 May 04;150:w20284
pubmed: 32400882
J Perinatol. 2020 Oct;40(10):1576-1581
pubmed: 32772051
Oman Med J. 2020 Apr 30;35(2):e122
pubmed: 32411417
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405
pubmed: 23480423
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 10;74(11):1953-1965
pubmed: 34390330
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):e95-e111
pubmed: 30307685
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Apr;19(4):614-624
pubmed: 34436977
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e047033
pubmed: 33622957
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Apr 11;8:23779608221089541
pubmed: 35434303
Am J Crit Care. 2021 Jul 1;30(4):302-311
pubmed: 33870412
J Pediatr. 2017 Jun;185:1
pubmed: 28746033
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Nov;11(8):1316-1318
pubmed: 32576517
J Perinatol. 2021 May;41(5):1187-1188
pubmed: 33589731
Diseases. 2021 Oct 13;9(4):
pubmed: 34698124
Crit Care. 2021 Sep 25;25(1):347
pubmed: 34563234
Intern Med J. 2022 May;52(5):763-769
pubmed: 35194927
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar;69(3):587-592
pubmed: 33320956
Nursing. 2021 Aug 1;51(8):56-60
pubmed: 34347756
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;18(14):
pubmed: 34300110

Auteurs

N Tacchini-Jacquier (N)

Development of Nursing Practices Unit, Valais Hospital, 86, Avenue du Grand-Champsec, CH-1951, Sion, Switzerland.

S Monnay (S)

Social Affairs and Human Resources Specialist, Valais Hospital, 86, Avenue du Grand-Champsec, CH-1951, Sion, Switzerland.

E Bonvin (E)

Valais Hospital, 86, Avenue Grand-Champsec, CH-1951, Sion, Switzerland.

J Dubuis (J)

Valais Family Caregivers' Association, 19, Avenue de Tourbillon, CH-1950, Sion, Switzerland.

H Verloo (H)

Valais Hospital, HES-SO Valais/Wallis, 5, Chemin de L'Agasse, CH-1950, Sion, Valais, Switzerland. henk.verloo@hevs.ch.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH