Antioxidative stress protein SRXN1 can be used as a radiotherapy prognostic marker for prostate cancer.
Antioxidant stress
Prognostic marker
Prostate cancer
Radiotherapy
SRXN1
Journal
BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Sep 2023
19 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
06
08
2022
accepted:
04
09
2023
medline:
21
9
2023
pubmed:
20
9
2023
entrez:
19
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore the mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance and search for prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. The GSE192817 and TCGA PRAD datasets were selected and downloaded from the GEO and UCSC Xena databases. Differential expression and functional annotation analyses were applied to 52 tumour cell samples from GSE192817. Then, the ssGSEA or GSVA algorithms were applied to quantitatively score the biological functional activity of samples in the GSE192817 and TCGA PRAD datasets, combined with specific gene sets collected from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). Subsequently, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the differences in ssGSEA or GSVA scores among cell types or PRAD patients. Moreover, radiotherapy resistance-associated gene screening was performed on DU145 and PC3 cells (prostate cancer cells), and survival analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of these genes for predicting the prognosis of PRAD patients. A total of 114 genes that were differentially expressed in more than two different cancer cell types and associated with either sham surgery or radiotherapy treatment (X-ray or photon irradiation) were detected in cancer cells from GSE192817. Comparison of DNA damage-related ssGSEA scores between sham surgery and radiotherapy treatment in prostate cancer cells (DU145 and PC3) showed that photon irradiation was potentially more effective than X-ray treatment. In the TCGA PRAD dataset, patients treated with radiotherapy had much higher "GOBP_CELLULAR_RESPONSE_TO_DNA_DAMAGE_STIMULUS", "GOBP_G2_DNA_DAMAGE_CHECKPOINT" and "GOBP_INTRA_S_DNA_DAMAGE_CHECKPOINT" GSVA scores, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test p values were 0.0005, 0.0062 and 0.0800, respectively. Furthermore, SRXN1 was upregulated in DU145 cells (resistant to X-ray irradiation compared to PC3 cells) after radiotherapy treatment, and low SRXN1 expression in patients was beneficial to radiotherapy outcomes. The log-rank test p value for PFS was 0.0072. Radiotherapy can damage DNA and induce oxidative stress to kill tumour cells. In this study, we found that SRXN1, as an antioxidative stress gene, plays an important role in radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatment, and this gene is also a potential biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients treated with radiotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37726767
doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01319-1
pii: 10.1186/s12894-023-01319-1
pmc: PMC10507967
doi:
Substances chimiques
SRXN1 protein, human
EC 1.8.98.2
Oxidoreductases Acting on Sulfur Group Donors
EC 1.8.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
148Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Adv Mater. 2017 Aug;29(32):
pubmed: 28643452
World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89
pubmed: 31068988
Redox Biol. 2019 Jul;25:101084
pubmed: 30612957
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan;8(1):15-21
pubmed: 29399346
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Mar;23(1):24-37
pubmed: 31197228
Cells. 2020 Apr 05;9(4):
pubmed: 32260562
Genes (Basel). 2019 Jan 04;10(1):
pubmed: 30621219
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec;9(12):688-99
pubmed: 23165124
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Jun;6(2):185-206
pubmed: 27250839
J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Sep;24(18):10714-10729
pubmed: 32746503
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Dec;22(4):509-521
pubmed: 30967625
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 May 9;19(6):28
pubmed: 29744681
Nat Commun. 2020 May 8;11(1):2298
pubmed: 32385233
Radiat Oncol J. 2021 Sep;39(3):231-238
pubmed: 34610662
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(22):8318-8332
pubmed: 32955798
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Jan 1;14(1):13-17
pubmed: 28138304
Environ Int. 2019 Nov;132:105109
pubmed: 31491608
Brain Res Bull. 2017 Jun;132:99-108
pubmed: 28552673
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):284-294
pubmed: 32750703
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Aug 30;6(1):322
pubmed: 34462423
Prostate. 2019 Jun;79(8):880-895
pubmed: 30900310
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Jan 23;744:135615
pubmed: 33421493
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 03;13(4):
pubmed: 33546432
Transl Oncol. 2018 Dec;11(6):1343-1349
pubmed: 30196236
BME Front. 2020 May 26;2020:9853609
pubmed: 37849969
Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;39(10):720-727
pubmed: 29254671
Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 21;12(5):
pubmed: 32455559
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 31;21(7):
pubmed: 32244327
BMJ. 2018 Sep 05;362:k3519
pubmed: 30185521
Oncotarget. 2016 Feb 2;7(5):5383-400
pubmed: 26689991
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Jan;31(1):58-66
pubmed: 30297164
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017
Prostate Int. 2019 Mar;7(1):1-8
pubmed: 30937291
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Oct;41(10):1037-1048
pubmed: 34288593
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Jan 20;2020:2148562
pubmed: 32411320
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;16(2):81-104
pubmed: 30356138