Morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize cefazolin surgical prophylaxis.

cefazolin colorectal surgery obesity pharmacokinetics

Journal

Pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 1875-9114
Titre abrégé: Pharmacotherapy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8111305

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2023
Historique:
revised: 09 08 2023
received: 14 04 2023
accepted: 13 08 2023
pubmed: 20 9 2023
medline: 20 9 2023
entrez: 20 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cefazolin is the leading antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections worldwide. Consensus guidelines recommend adjustment of the cefazolin dose above and below 120 kg without regard to body composition. Algorithms exist to repurpose radiologic data into body composition (morphomics) and inform dosing decisions in obesity. To compare the current standard of body weight to morphomic measurements as covariates of cefazolin pharmacokinetics and aid dose stratification of cefazolin in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery. This prospective study measured cefazolin plasma, fat, and colon tissue concentrations in colorectal surgery patients in order to develop a morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to guide dose adjustments. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was also constructed to inform tissue partitioning in morbidly obese patients (n = 21, body mass index ≥35 kg/m Morphomics and pharmacokinetic data were available in 58 patients with a median [min, max] weight and age of 95.9 [68.5, 148.8] kg and 55 [25, 79] years, respectively. The plasma-to-subcutaneous fat partition coefficient was predicted to be 0.072 and 0.060 by the PopPK and PBPK models, respectively. The estimated creatinine clearance (eCL Kidney function and morphomics were more informative than body weight as covariates of cefazolin target site exposure. Data from more diverse populations, consensus on target cefazolin exposure, and comparative studies are needed before a change in practice can be implemented.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37728152
doi: 10.1002/phar.2878
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Organisme : National Cancer Institute

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Références

Bratzler DW, Hunt DR. The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;3:322-330.
Stratchounski LS, Taylor EW, Dellinger EP, Pechere JC. Antibiotic policies in surgery: a consensus paper. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005;4:312-322.
Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;13:1198-1208.
Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berrios-Torres SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:S66-S88.
Hourigan JS. Impact of obesity on surgical site infection in colon and rectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011;4:283-290.
Wick EC, Hirose K, Shore AD, et al. Surgical site infections and cost in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;9:1068-1072.
Wahl TS, Patel FC, Goss LE, Chu DI, Grams J, Morris MS. The obese colorectal surgery patient: surgical site infection and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;8:938-945.
Toma O, Suntrup P, Stefanescu A, London A, Mutch M, Kharasch E. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection. Anesth Analg. 2011;4:730-737.
Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes. 2014;2014:638936.
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013;1:73-156.
Morrish GA, Pai MP, Green B. The effects of obesity on drug pharmacokinetics in humans. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;6:697-706.
Green B, Duffull SB. What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;2:119-133.
Englesbe MJ, Lee JS, He K, et al. Analytic morphomics, core muscle size, and surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2012;2:255-261.
Alrammaal HH, Abduljalil K, Hodgetts Morton V, et al. Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict cefazolin and cefuroxime disposition in obese pregnant women undergoing caesarean section. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:6.
Poltak J, Connors C, Wungwattana M, Nicolau D, Mercuro NJ, Liu J. Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in patients with obesity undergoing surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;8(Pt B):2942-2947.
Lanoiselee J, Chaux R, Hodin S, et al. Population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin in total hip arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2021;1:19763.
Brill MJ, Houwink AP, Schmidt S, et al. Reduced subcutaneous tissue distribution of cefazolin in morbidly obese versus non-obese patients determined using clinical microdialysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;3:715-723.
Roberts JA, Udy AA, Jarrett P, et al. Plasma and target-site subcutaneous tissue population pharmacokinetics and dosing simulations of cefazolin in post-trauma critically ill patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;5:1495-1502.
Grupper M, Kuti JL, Swank ML, Maggio L, Hughes BL, Nicolau DP. Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in serum and adipose tissue from overweight and obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6:712-719.
Derstine BA, Holcombe SA, Ross BE, Wang NC, Su GL, Wang SC. Skeletal muscle cutoff values for sarcopenia diagnosis using T10 to L5 measurements in a healthy US population. Sci Rep. 2018;1:11369.
Krishnamurthy V, Zhang P, Ethiraj S, et al. Use of analytic morphomics of liver, spleen, and body composition to identify patients at risk for cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;2:360-368.e5.
Pai MP. Estimating the glomerular filtration rate in obese adult patients for drug dosing. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;5:e53-e62.
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;1:31-41.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. 2020.
Portet S. A primer on model selection using the Akaike information criterion. Infect Dis Model. 2020;5:111-128.
Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Second International Symposium on Information Theory 1973; pp: 267-81.
Jain JG, Housman ST, Nicolau DP. Humanized tissue pharmacodynamics of cefazolin against commonly isolated pathogens in skin and skin structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;9:2443-2447.
Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;1:1-10; quiz 11-2.
So W, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in serum and tissue for patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI). Infect Dis Ther. 2014;2:269-279.
van Kralingen S, Taks M, Diepstraten J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cefazolin in morbidly obese patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;10:985-992.
Douglas A, Udy AA, Wallis SC, et al. Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in patients undergoing elective and semielective abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;11:5238-5242.
Cao Y, Jusko WJ. Applications of minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012;6:711-723.
Shebley M, Sandhu P, Emami Riedmaier A, et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model qualification and reporting procedures for regulatory submissions: a consortium perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;1:88-110.
Komatsu T, Natsume Y, Uchiyama K, et al. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of cefazolin in the serum and hip joint capsule of patients undergoing Total hip arthroplasty. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65:e02114-20.
Dorn C, Petroff D, Stoelzel M, et al. Perioperative administration of cefazolin and metronidazole in obese and non-obese patients: a pharmacokinetic study in plasma and interstitial fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;8:2114-2120.
Craig WA, Welling PG, Jackson TC, Kunin CM. Pharmacology of cefazolin and other cephalosporins in patients with renal insufficiency. J Infect Dis. 1973;128(Suppl):S347-S353.
Brogard JM, Pinget M, Brandt C, Lavillaureix J. Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in patients with renal failure; special reference to hemodialysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4:225-230.

Auteurs

Shuhan Liu (S)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Aleksas Matvekas (A)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Tamara Naimi (T)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Aws Ghanem (A)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Ruiting Li (R)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Krishani Rajanayake (K)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Brian Derstine (B)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Brian Ross (B)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

June Sullivan (J)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Hyun Gi Yun (HG)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Scott Regenbogen (S)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

John Byrn (J)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Grace Su (G)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Stewart Wang (S)

Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Manjunath P Pai (MP)

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Classifications MeSH