Prognosis of patients with T1 low-grade urothelial bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy.


Journal

Minerva urology and nephrology
ISSN: 2724-6442
Titre abrégé: Minerva Urol Nephrol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777299

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 21 9 2023
pubmed: 20 9 2023
entrez: 20 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The existence and prognosis of T1LG (T1 low-grade) bladder cancer is controversial. Also, because of data paucity, it remains unclear what is the clinical history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated T1LG tumors and if it differs from other NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer) representatives. The aim of this study was to analyse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1LG bladder cancers treated with BCG immunotherapy. A multi-institutional and retrospective study of 2510 patients with Ta/T1 NMIBC with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) treated with BCG (205 T1LG patients) was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test for RFS and PFS to compare the survival between TaLG, TaHG, T1LG, and T1HG NMIBC were used. Also, T1LG tumors were categorized into EAU2021 risk groups and PFS analysis was performed, and Cox multivariate model for both RFS and PFS were constructed. The median follow-up was 52 months. For the T1LG cohort, the estimated RFS and PFS rates at 5-year were 59.3% and 89.2%, respectively. While there were no differences in RFS between NMIBC subpopulations, a slightly better PFS was found in T1LG NMIBC compared to T1HG (5-year PFS; T1LG vs. T1HG: 82% vs. 89%; P<0.001). A heterogeneous classification of patients with T1LG NMIBC was observed when EAU 2021 prognostic model was applied, finding a statistically significant worse PFS in patients classified as high-risk T1LG (5-year PFS; 81.8%) compared to those in intermediate (5-year PFS; 93,4%), and low-risk T1LG tumors (5-year PFS; 98,1%). The RFS of T1LG was comparable to other NMIBC subpopulations. The PFS of T1LG tumors was significantly better than of T1HG NMIBC. The EAU2021 scoring model heterogeneously categorized the risk of progression in T1LG tumors and the high-risk T1LG had the worst PFS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The existence and prognosis of T1LG (T1 low-grade) bladder cancer is controversial. Also, because of data paucity, it remains unclear what is the clinical history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated T1LG tumors and if it differs from other NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer) representatives. The aim of this study was to analyse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1LG bladder cancers treated with BCG immunotherapy.
METHODS METHODS
A multi-institutional and retrospective study of 2510 patients with Ta/T1 NMIBC with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) treated with BCG (205 T1LG patients) was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test for RFS and PFS to compare the survival between TaLG, TaHG, T1LG, and T1HG NMIBC were used. Also, T1LG tumors were categorized into EAU2021 risk groups and PFS analysis was performed, and Cox multivariate model for both RFS and PFS were constructed.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median follow-up was 52 months. For the T1LG cohort, the estimated RFS and PFS rates at 5-year were 59.3% and 89.2%, respectively. While there were no differences in RFS between NMIBC subpopulations, a slightly better PFS was found in T1LG NMIBC compared to T1HG (5-year PFS; T1LG vs. T1HG: 82% vs. 89%; P<0.001). A heterogeneous classification of patients with T1LG NMIBC was observed when EAU 2021 prognostic model was applied, finding a statistically significant worse PFS in patients classified as high-risk T1LG (5-year PFS; 81.8%) compared to those in intermediate (5-year PFS; 93,4%), and low-risk T1LG tumors (5-year PFS; 98,1%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The RFS of T1LG was comparable to other NMIBC subpopulations. The PFS of T1LG tumors was significantly better than of T1HG NMIBC. The EAU2021 scoring model heterogeneously categorized the risk of progression in T1LG tumors and the high-risk T1LG had the worst PFS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37728495
pii: S2724-6051.23.05418-6
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05418-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

BCG Vaccine 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

591-599

Auteurs

Radosław Piszczek (R)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Wojciech Krajewski (W)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland - wk@softstar.pl.

Jose D Subiela (JD)

Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.

Francesco Del Giudice (F)

Department of Urology, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Łukasz Nowak (Ł)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Joanna Chorbińska (J)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Marco Moschini (M)

Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Alexandra Masson-Lecomte (A)

Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Sonia Bebane (S)

Department of Urology, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.

Alessia Cimadamore (A)

Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.

Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin (E)

Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Morgan Rouprêt (M)

Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

David D'Andrea (D)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Riccardo Mastroianni (R)

Department of Urology, IRCCS &quot;Regina Elena&quot; National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

Beatriz Gutierrez Hidalgo (B)

Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Juan Gomez Rivas (J)

Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Keiichiro Mori (K)

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Francesco Soria (F)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy.

Ekaterina Laukhtina (E)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Andrea Mari (A)

Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Simone Albisinni (S)

Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Andrea Gallioli (A)

Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Laura S Mertens (LS)

Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Renate Pichler (R)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Gautier Marcq (G)

Department of Urology, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

Jan Łaszkiewicz (J)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Agnieszka Hałoń (A)

Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Diego M Carrion (DM)

Department of Urology, Torrejon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Murat Akand (M)

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Juan Palou (J)

Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Marko Babjuk (M)

Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Javier Burgos Revilla (J)

Department of Urology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.

Bartosz Małkiewicz (B)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Tomasz Szydełko (T)

Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH