A Swine Model of Neural Circuit Electromagnetic Fields: Effects of Immediate Electromagnetic Field Stimulation on Cortical Injury.
controlled cortical impact
electromagnetic field
electromagnetic field stimulation
emf
neuronal circuit
sensors
stimulation
swine model
tbi
traumatic brain injury
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
01
08
2023
accepted:
19
08
2023
medline:
21
9
2023
pubmed:
21
9
2023
entrez:
21
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Neurologic diseases have profound disability, mortality, and socioeconomic effects worldwide. Treatment of these disorders varies but is largely limited to unique factors associated with neural physiology. Early studies have evaluated alterations in electromagnetic fields (EMF) due to neural disorders with subsequent modulation of EMF as a potential treatment modality. Swine models have begun to be evaluated as translational models in this effect. Methods EMF measurements of a Yucatan miniswine were recorded using proprietary non-contact, non-invasive induction sensors with a dual layer Mu-metal and interlaced copper mesh helmet. The swine then underwent controlled cortical impact (CCI) to simulate traumatic brain injury (TBI). Twenty minutes post-injury after surgical wound closure, the swine underwent targeted EMF signal modulation using a signal generator to stimulate the swine's injured cortical circuit using a sinusoidal wave individualized at 2.5 Hz with a 500mV positive offset at 1V. After 10 days of stimulation, settings were modified to another individualized frequency of 5.5 Hz, 500mV positive offset and 1V for stimulation. Behavioral patterns in swine were evaluated, and EMF measurements were recorded daily prior to, during, and after stimulation. Artificial intelligence (AI) models evaluated patterns in EMF signals. Histology of the stimulated swine cortex was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining and pentachrome staining and compared to a control swine without stimulation and a swine that had received stimulation two days post-injury in a delayed fashion. Serial serum specimens and tissue at the time of euthanasia were obtained for assessment of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentration. Results Pre-operative and post-stimulation measurements demonstrated differences in patterns and activity early on. There was an identified peak at 1.6Hz, not frequently seen pre-operatively. There were convergent frequencies in both data sets at 10.5 Hz and 3.9 Hz. Plateaus and decreased variability of changes in slope were identified early in the post-injury phase. AI modeling identified early similarities in pre-operative and post-stimulation measurements through the patterns of peaks with similarities on postoperative day 10 and similarities in the valleys on postoperative day 17. Histologic specimens identified increased degrees of apoptosis and cellular death in the non-stimulated control compared to the stimulated swine. Similarly, the immediately stimulated swine had less apoptosis and increased histologic viability at the site of injury compared to the two-day delayed stimulation swine. There were increased levels of NSE noted in the stimulated swine at the site of injury compared to non-injured sites and the control swine. Conclusions Cortical function was appropriately measured through induction sensors and shielding in the form of a helmet and electromagnetic field channels. Early stimulation resulted in the early and durable recovery of neuronal circuit-driven electromagnetic field patterns. Histology identified increased viability of neurons with fewer apoptotic neurons and glial cells in stimulated swine with early stimulation identifying the best effect compared to a non-stimulated subject. This recovery identifies change and recovery at the circuit, cellular, and subcellular levels that potentiate the need for further study of EMF modulation as a treatment modality in neurological disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37731409
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43774
pmc: PMC10506916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43774Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Brazdzionis et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Novel Induction sensors used in this study are patented technologies from Quasar Federal Systems. The electromagnetic shielded helmet, channels, and shielding technologies are patent pending to Dan Miulli et al.
Références
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4540291
pubmed: 29318150
Brain Stimul. 2023 Mar-Apr;16(2):456-457
pubmed: 36773778
Brain Sci. 2018 Feb 18;8(2):
pubmed: 29463007
Biomedicines. 2022 Jan 29;10(2):
pubmed: 35203533
J Biotechnol Biomed. 2023;6(2):95-104
pubmed: 37388676
J Biol Phys. 2005 Dec;31(3-4):501-14
pubmed: 23345914
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 06;5:14769
pubmed: 26440604
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 30;22(15):
pubmed: 34360980
J Neurotrauma. 2006 Feb;23(2):128-39
pubmed: 16503797
J Biotechnol Biomed. 2023;6(1):32-46
pubmed: 36865683
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Apr;31(3):479-505
pubmed: 31880207
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:2530270
pubmed: 29065581
Neural Regen Res. 2019 Mar;14(3):413-424
pubmed: 30539807
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2022 Jan 15;23(1):42-57
pubmed: 35029087
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Sep 26;10:294
pubmed: 30319398
Cureus. 2023 Jul 12;15(7):e41763
pubmed: 37575822
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):274-92
pubmed: 21691215
Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42544
pubmed: 37637613
Ochsner J. 2018 Fall;18(3):264-267
pubmed: 30275792
Brain Res Bull. 2021 Jun;171:75-83
pubmed: 33753209