Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.

UX design design design recommendations mobile app mobile phone older adults older user quality of life smartphone software tablet tool training usability testing user experience design visual design

Journal

JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 09 2023
Historique:
received: 03 10 2022
accepted: 11 07 2023
revised: 20 06 2023
medline: 22 9 2023
pubmed: 21 9 2023
entrez: 21 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mobile apps are fundamental tools in today's society for practical and social endeavors. However, these technologies are often not usable for older users. Given the increased use of mobile apps by this group of users and the impact that certain services may have on their quality of life, such as mobile health, personal finance, or online administrative procedures, a clear set of guidelines for mobile app designers is needed. Existing recommendations for older adults focus on investigations with certain groups of older adults or have not been extracted from experimental results. In this research work, we systematically reviewed the scientific literature that provided recommendations for the design of mobile apps based on usability testing with older adults and organized such recommendations into a meaningful set of design guidelines. We conducted a systematic literature review of journal and conference articles from 2010 to 2021. We included articles that carried out usability tests with populations aged >60 years and presented transferable guidelines on mobile software design, resulting in a final set of 40 articles. We then carried out a thematic analysis with 3 rounds of analysis to provide meaning to an otherwise diverse set of recommendations. At this stage, we discarded recommendations that were made by just 1 article, were based on a specific mobile app and were therefore nontransferrable, were based on other authors' literature (as opposed to recommendations based on the results of usability tests), or were not sufficiently argued. With the remaining recommendations, we identified commonalities, wrote a faithful statement for each guideline, used a common language for the entire set, and organized the guidelines into categories, thereby giving shape to an otherwise diverse set of recommendations. Among the 27 resulting guidelines, the rules Simplify and Increase the size and distance between interactive controls were transversal and of the greatest significance. The rest of the guidelines were divided into 5 categories (Help & Training, Navigation, Visual Design, Cognitive Load, and Interaction) and consequent subcategories in Visual Design (Layout, Icons, and Appearance) and Interaction (Input and Output). The recommendations were structured, explained in detail, and illustrated with applied examples extracted from the selected studies, where appropriate. We discussed the design implications of applying these guidelines, contextualized with relevant studies. We also discussed the limitations of the approach followed, stressing the need for further experimentation to gain a better understanding of how older adults use mobile apps and how to better design such apps with these users in mind. The compiled guidelines support the design of mobile apps that cater to the needs of older adults because they are based on the results of actual usability tests with users aged >60 years.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Mobile apps are fundamental tools in today's society for practical and social endeavors. However, these technologies are often not usable for older users. Given the increased use of mobile apps by this group of users and the impact that certain services may have on their quality of life, such as mobile health, personal finance, or online administrative procedures, a clear set of guidelines for mobile app designers is needed. Existing recommendations for older adults focus on investigations with certain groups of older adults or have not been extracted from experimental results.
OBJECTIVE
In this research work, we systematically reviewed the scientific literature that provided recommendations for the design of mobile apps based on usability testing with older adults and organized such recommendations into a meaningful set of design guidelines.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature review of journal and conference articles from 2010 to 2021. We included articles that carried out usability tests with populations aged >60 years and presented transferable guidelines on mobile software design, resulting in a final set of 40 articles. We then carried out a thematic analysis with 3 rounds of analysis to provide meaning to an otherwise diverse set of recommendations. At this stage, we discarded recommendations that were made by just 1 article, were based on a specific mobile app and were therefore nontransferrable, were based on other authors' literature (as opposed to recommendations based on the results of usability tests), or were not sufficiently argued. With the remaining recommendations, we identified commonalities, wrote a faithful statement for each guideline, used a common language for the entire set, and organized the guidelines into categories, thereby giving shape to an otherwise diverse set of recommendations.
RESULTS
Among the 27 resulting guidelines, the rules Simplify and Increase the size and distance between interactive controls were transversal and of the greatest significance. The rest of the guidelines were divided into 5 categories (Help & Training, Navigation, Visual Design, Cognitive Load, and Interaction) and consequent subcategories in Visual Design (Layout, Icons, and Appearance) and Interaction (Input and Output). The recommendations were structured, explained in detail, and illustrated with applied examples extracted from the selected studies, where appropriate. We discussed the design implications of applying these guidelines, contextualized with relevant studies. We also discussed the limitations of the approach followed, stressing the need for further experimentation to gain a better understanding of how older adults use mobile apps and how to better design such apps with these users in mind.
CONCLUSIONS
The compiled guidelines support the design of mobile apps that cater to the needs of older adults because they are based on the results of actual usability tests with users aged >60 years.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37733401
pii: v11i1e43186
doi: 10.2196/43186
pmc: PMC10557006
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e43186

Informations de copyright

©Miguel Gomez-Hernandez, Xavier Ferre, Cristian Moral, Elena Villalba-Mora. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.09.2023.

Références

Gerontologist. 2020 Sep 15;60(7):e513-e523
pubmed: 31773145
J Med Syst. 2015 Feb;39(2):1
pubmed: 25600193
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998 Sep;53(5):P329-40
pubmed: 9750571
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jan;16(1):54-61
pubmed: 30853507
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 09;4(2):e29
pubmed: 27282195
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 20;9:20552076231181229
pubmed: 37361432
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Sep;83(9):624-35
pubmed: 24996581
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Oct;43(5 Suppl):S22-S26
pubmed: 20937480
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236091
pubmed: 32730266
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2017 Sep;61(1):6-10
pubmed: 30930610
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):45-57
pubmed: 30260407
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Apr 26;5(2):e18
pubmed: 29699969
Hum Factors. 2007 Jun;49(3):465-76
pubmed: 17552310
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;10(1):117
pubmed: 33875004
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 30;5(5):e71
pubmed: 28559227
J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Jan;38(1):49-72
pubmed: 29166818
Front Digit Health. 2020 Sep 08;2:15
pubmed: 34713028
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 27;8(4):e16507
pubmed: 32338616
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 14;10(1):e29512
pubmed: 35029535
Front Digit Health. 2021 May 07;3:659940
pubmed: 34713133
Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):417-430
pubmed: 30452746
Int J Older People Nurs. 2018 Mar;13(1):
pubmed: 28752612
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Dec;41(4):337-342
pubmed: 30085996

Auteurs

Miguel Gomez-Hernandez (M)

Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Emerging Technologies Research Lab, Department of Human-Centred Computing, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Xavier Ferre (X)

Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
School of Software Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Cristian Moral (C)

Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.

Elena Villalba-Mora (E)

Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH